This place says its in stock??
http://www.mpcoutlet.com/phenom-ii-x...-pr-22107.html
Same here.
http://store.buildurownpc.com/83554.html
This place says its in stock??
http://www.mpcoutlet.com/phenom-ii-x...-pr-22107.html
Same here.
http://store.buildurownpc.com/83554.html
Last edited by chew*; 10-25-2009 at 06:51 AM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
They may say in stock raiderman but are pre order until nov 4th respectively.
I just double checked those sites and their respective part numbers.
It seems they have the 140w part numbers???
HDZ965FBGMBOX = 125w
HDZ965FBGIBOX = 140w ?
I was about to pull the trigger on a 140w 965, now I will wait for C3!
Such ashame that NDA isnt lifted, I hope to see such a chip very soon![]()
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Relax, guys...![]()
i heard, its fixed now, about 4GHz with AIR stabil now too at x64 OS :-)
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...id=68&Itemid=1AMD's Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 Revision
For one or the other reason, AMD's current desktop flagship CPU, that is the Deneb core-based Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition has had some power issues. Whereas every other AMD processor is rated at or below 125W TDP, the '965 Black Edition with its unlocked multipliers for core and North Bridge has been rated at 140W, enough to raise more than one eyebrow in the evermore energy conscious world. From a misconceptual point of view, the biggest issue is that TDP does not mean that the processor will actually draw that much power, rather the TDP acronym has undergone so many permutations that it is no longer really clear what it stands for. To sync everybody back to the same page, it is the thermal design power, that is the power requirement that has to be met by the voltage regulator module and the heatsink in order to warrant save operation of the CPU under any and all conditions - as long as they are reasonable.
With the samples we had in our test labs, we never got even close to the 140W, in fact, we struggled to hit the 110W benchmark even if power was measured before the VRM which, given an efficacy in the order of 75-80% translates into maximum CPU power in the area of some 90W. It is self-understood that there have to be margins, especially when dealing with Taiwanese or Chinese motherboard manufacturers, at the same time, that 140W number has made the rounds and not helped AMD's reputation for power efficiency.
Reason enough to introduce a new revision of the Phenom II with a few small but nonetheless important differences under the metal layers .....
nice article.
The performance hit of the CnQ didn't showed. We need some benchs about that.
Article pulled? NDA is November 5th IIRC.
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
Main Rig:
Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black
I am a new member of lostcircuits :P
seems that the C3 is really something hope the 6 core is also based on this or C4 hehehe
The OC was very impressive indeed 4Ghz with full on HTT and ability to reach 3000Ghz on NB is impressive to say the least. With C2 955 it was hard to reach 2800 NB. The thing about the voltage is a bit off tough 1.5v for 4Ghz is not that good IMO, the 955 C2 need more or less the same volts to reach 4ghz mark.
Coming Soon
Phenom II X4 965 BE Revision C3 Review
http://www.guru3d.com/article/phenom...3-review-test/
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...i_x4_965_125w/
Last edited by onethreehill; 11-03-2009 at 09:15 PM.
Phenom II X4 965 BE Revision C3 Review
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=384&Itemid=63
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...2_965_refresh/
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...ii_2ndcorerev/
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/dis...x4-965-c3.html
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...be-c3-review/1
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-965,2468.html
Last edited by onethreehill; 11-04-2009 at 02:16 AM.
3.4GHz to 4GHz is not really a good overclock in my opinion
Many people here have overclocked 920 from 2.66GHz to 4GHz or even more, and that much better overclock than 3.4GHz to 4GHz
with very low change of vcore only ?
Nice job, matose! Never thought this processor will be available in Romania for testing so soon.![]()
The ceiling on the Ph2 was around 3.8ghz-4.0ghz with good air cooling under a 32bit OS. People were simply taking their lowly stock clocked CPU and pushing it to the limit, it just so happens that the 965 is 3.4ghz stock and the ceiling happens to between a 400-600mhz increase form there instead of a 1ghz-1.2ghz increase from a lower clocked Ph2.
This also applies to the i7 and pretty much every other CPU architecture to date. Why do you think chips like the 3200/3700+, Opty 165, X2 3800, E6600 and Q6600 were so popular? They were the lowest clocked CPU's in a series and they were able to overclock to meet or exceed their flagship brethren because of the headroom available at a much much lower price.
Last edited by TheBlueChanell; 11-04-2009 at 03:14 AM.
Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
--- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
--- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -
Bookmarks