MMM
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 114

Thread: AMD Phenom II X4 965 - Revision C2 vs C3 comparison

  1. #76
    Xtreme Enthusiast Raiderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    503
    C3 Phenom II 965 BE (0941CPMW)
    Msi 790Fx-GD 70
    2x2 gb OCZ AMD Black Edition 1600mhz DDR 3
    2x MSI HD 5850's OC edition X-fire
    2x Western Digital 250gb 16mb cache Raid-0
    1x Seagate 1 TB Data
    SILVERSTONE|DA700 700W RT Power Supply
    Koolance INX-720 (Koolance 345 block)
    LianLi pc-60fwb




  2. #77
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    Quote Originally Posted by matose View Post
    Please go an tell the guys that are posting Gulftown results that January is 3 months away

    I modified the pic, now it's ok?
    Please go tell AMD that you give a rats ass about NDA and want exclusivity. Sure they will be more than happy to hook you up next time around


    They may say in stock raiderman but are pre order until nov 4th respectively.
    Last edited by chew*; 10-25-2009 at 06:51 AM.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  3. #78
    Xtreme Enthusiast Raiderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    503
    They may say in stock raiderman but are pre order until nov 4th respectively.


    I just double checked those sites and their respective part numbers.
    It seems they have the 140w part numbers???

    HDZ965FBGMBOX = 125w
    HDZ965FBGIBOX = 140w ?

    I was about to pull the trigger on a 140w 965, now I will wait for C3!
    C3 Phenom II 965 BE (0941CPMW)
    Msi 790Fx-GD 70
    2x2 gb OCZ AMD Black Edition 1600mhz DDR 3
    2x MSI HD 5850's OC edition X-fire
    2x Western Digital 250gb 16mb cache Raid-0
    1x Seagate 1 TB Data
    SILVERSTONE|DA700 700W RT Power Supply
    Koolance INX-720 (Koolance 345 block)
    LianLi pc-60fwb




  4. #79
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Such ashame that NDA isnt lifted, I hope to see such a chip very soon
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  5. #80
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
    I just double checked those sites and their respective part numbers.
    It seems they have the 140w part numbers???

    HDZ965FBGMBOX = 125w
    HDZ965FBGIBOX = 140w ?

    I was about to pull the trigger on a 140w 965, now I will wait for C3!
    Glad you looked a little deeper into it and did not accidentally order the wrong thing.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  6. #81
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    Please go tell AMD that you give a rats ass about NDA and want exclusivity.

    Great sugestion, thx!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by matose
    Please go an tell the guys that are posting Gulftown results that January is 3 months away
    What does that have to do with anything, there really have something to be proud about
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  7. #82
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Relax, guys...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  8. #83
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    I'll relax in Paris bro. Now I am pissed I have to pack my luggage once again....Bleah
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  9. #84
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by jakefalcons View Post
    Should test with 64 bit too :P that's what I'm interested in.
    Yep^

    Win 7 is the standard now, 64bit.

  10. #85
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    i heard, its fixed now, about 4GHz with AIR stabil now too at x64 OS :-)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  11. #86
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    AMD's Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 Revision
    For one or the other reason, AMD's current desktop flagship CPU, that is the Deneb core-based Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition has had some power issues. Whereas every other AMD processor is rated at or below 125W TDP, the '965 Black Edition with its unlocked multipliers for core and North Bridge has been rated at 140W, enough to raise more than one eyebrow in the evermore energy conscious world. From a misconceptual point of view, the biggest issue is that TDP does not mean that the processor will actually draw that much power, rather the TDP acronym has undergone so many permutations that it is no longer really clear what it stands for. To sync everybody back to the same page, it is the thermal design power, that is the power requirement that has to be met by the voltage regulator module and the heatsink in order to warrant save operation of the CPU under any and all conditions - as long as they are reasonable.

    With the samples we had in our test labs, we never got even close to the 140W, in fact, we struggled to hit the 110W benchmark even if power was measured before the VRM which, given an efficacy in the order of 75-80% translates into maximum CPU power in the area of some 90W. It is self-understood that there have to be margins, especially when dealing with Taiwanese or Chinese motherboard manufacturers, at the same time, that 140W number has made the rounds and not helped AMD's reputation for power efficiency.

    Reason enough to introduce a new revision of the Phenom II with a few small but nonetheless important differences under the metal layers .....
    http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...id=68&Itemid=1

  12. #87
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    nice article.

    The performance hit of the CnQ didn't showed. We need some benchs about that.

  13. #88
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Article pulled? NDA is November 5th IIRC.

  14. #89
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post
    Article pulled? NDA is November 5th IIRC.
    Just have to log in it seems.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  15. #90
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post
    Article pulled? NDA is November 5th IIRC.
    nop it's 4th
    and yeah C3 is Prime stable @ 4GHz under 64bit Win7 with voltage below 1.5V, and under heat pipe air cooling
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  16. #91
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    nop it's 4th
    and yeah C3 is Prime stable @ 4GHz under 64bit Win7 with voltage below 1.5V, and under heat pipe air cooling
    impressive!!
    would like to know if their Phenom II x3 has got anything based on C3 stepping or not
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  17. #92
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    I am a new member of lostcircuits :P

    seems that the C3 is really something hope the 6 core is also based on this or C4 hehehe

    The OC was very impressive indeed 4Ghz with full on HTT and ability to reach 3000Ghz on NB is impressive to say the least. With C2 955 it was hard to reach 2800 NB. The thing about the voltage is a bit off tough 1.5v for 4Ghz is not that good IMO, the 955 C2 need more or less the same volts to reach 4ghz mark.
    Coming Soon

  18. #93
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Last edited by onethreehill; 11-03-2009 at 09:15 PM.

  19. #94
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    33
    sweet

  20. #95

  21. #96
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    253
    3.4GHz to 4GHz is not really a good overclock in my opinion

    Many people here have overclocked 920 from 2.66GHz to 4GHz or even more, and that much better overclock than 3.4GHz to 4GHz

  22. #97
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    Quote Originally Posted by dartaz View Post
    3.4GHz to 4GHz is not really a good overclock in my opinion

    Many people here have overclocked 920 from 2.66GHz to 4GHz or even more, and that much better overclock than 3.4GHz to 4GHz
    +1 most 920 do are sat at 4.2-4.4 got mine at 4.2

  23. #98
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    with very low change of vcore only ?

  24. #99
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bucharest
    Posts
    11
    Nice job, matose! Never thought this processor will be available in Romania for testing so soon.

  25. #100
    Xtreme Enthusiast TheBlueChanell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by dartaz View Post
    3.4GHz to 4GHz is not really a good overclock in my opinion

    Many people here have overclocked 920 from 2.66GHz to 4GHz or even more, and that much better overclock than 3.4GHz to 4GHz
    The ceiling on the Ph2 was around 3.8ghz-4.0ghz with good air cooling under a 32bit OS. People were simply taking their lowly stock clocked CPU and pushing it to the limit, it just so happens that the 965 is 3.4ghz stock and the ceiling happens to between a 400-600mhz increase form there instead of a 1ghz-1.2ghz increase from a lower clocked Ph2.

    This also applies to the i7 and pretty much every other CPU architecture to date. Why do you think chips like the 3200/3700+, Opty 165, X2 3800, E6600 and Q6600 were so popular? They were the lowest clocked CPU's in a series and they were able to overclock to meet or exceed their flagship brethren because of the headroom available at a much much lower price.
    Last edited by TheBlueChanell; 11-04-2009 at 03:14 AM.
    Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
    HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
    HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
    HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •