MMM
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 87

Thread: China successfully developed "Milky Way One" Supercomputer

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Hu1kamania View Post
    lol yeah, but I think the US one will win!
    If Fermi powers that one:

    - Sir, we have a problem. the 5000 Fermi videocards we bought for our supercomputer...
    - ...... yes? What's the problem?
    - Wooden scre-
    - DAMN YOU JENSENNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn:::::::.:::: :...:..... .... . . (slowly disappearing scream)
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  2. #52
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    If Fermi powers that one:

    - Sir, we have a problem. the 5000 Fermi videocards we bought for our supercomputer...
    - ...... yes? What's the problem?
    - Wooden scre-
    - DAMN YOU JENSENNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn:::::::.:::: :...:..... .... . . (slowly disappearing scream)
    What do you have against wooden screws? Thats just nvidias way of going green.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    and everyone within 100 miles has lead poisoning
    Exactly.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #54
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Hacking the U.S. Super Computer.
    So U.S. hardware hacking U.S. hardware. Kind of ironic.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #55
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Hacking the U.S. Super Computer.
    Maybe not the US computer, but US encryption perhaps. Digital Fortress anyone?

  6. #56
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stockton, CA
    Posts
    3,569
    Quote Originally Posted by rogueagent6 View Post
    This is China we are talking about, they're probably only going to use it to infiltrate more gold farmers into WoW.
    The new rage is Aion, man they are every where. Login with a new character and get slamed with gold seller spam. Bots and sellers non stop.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,064
    what the point for such server farms to have massive GPUs running for?

    BIG Bro observation?

  8. #58
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Philly/NJ
    Posts
    3,933
    i was talking to a friend last night about enermax's chinese website, its hilarious how every product they have has to be an "anti-us" product

  9. #59
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    woah crazy.. imagine if they changed the 4870x2 to 5970 gpus... but imagine having to physically swap all 5,120 gpus out

  10. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Serra View Post
    Aside from apparently storing a lot of data on the processors (?) does anyone know what they plan on using it for?
    It will be used for national weather forecast center. The setup uses Intel Xeon processor, 4870x2, and a specially designed OS. According to some reports, when using NV's GPU during early stage testing, 4870x2 only trailed behind for 2% in efficiency in certain test, and others pull ahead. Since 4870x2 is cheaper, we all know what the outcome would be.

  11. #61
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    woah crazy.. imagine if they changed the 4870x2 to 5970 gpus... but imagine having to physically swap all 5,120 gpus out
    Im sure someone there is willing to do it for .05 an hour


    I think bill gates' desktop is of similar performance no?
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  12. #62
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by duckbillclinton View Post
    It will be used for national weather forecast center. The setup uses Intel Xeon processor, 4870x2, and a specially designed OS. According to some reports, when using NV's GPU during early stage testing, 4870x2 only trailed behind for 2% in efficiency in certain test, and others pull ahead. Since 4870x2 is cheaper, we all know what the outcome would be.
    Do you have a link, or more details about this "specially designed OS"?

    Do I see it right?, is it 2 CPU + 2 GPU on each blade in this picture?
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 10-30-2009 at 12:55 AM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  13. #63
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    looks like quad cpu + 2x hd4870x2

  14. #64
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pamplona, SPAIN
    Posts
    1,182
    And 16 DIMMs per plate. So they are using Brook+, that makes it almost impossible to switch to Nvidia hardware. Why didn't they use OpenCL and program the whole thing from scratch? I assumed that should be the case for mainframes like this. Two years in development and they use the standard API? With so many people they only had one guy assembling the cards?
    Quote Originally Posted by the article
    "As far as I know, a combination of CPU and GPU is something new used to make a petaflop computer. A GPU, or graphic processing unit, plays a role as an accelerator to make the computer run faster, but reduces its power consumption and cost," Zhou explained.
    I'm not sure on the figures about processing power against power consumption and price. Is a GPU better for crunching in power consumption too?
    i7 2600k @4500 | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 | Gskill 2x4096Mb 2133Mhz | 4x2TB WD Green RAID10 | OCZ Vertex3 120Gb | 2x AMD 6950 @ Stock
    Benq 24" TN | Samsung LE46C630 "2nd" Monitor | Enermax NAXN ENP850EWT | Corsair 800D Case | Corsair H60 | Logitech G9x + Wireless Solar K750

  15. #65
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by mursaat View Post
    And 16 DIMMs per plate. So they are using Brook+, that makes it almost impossible to switch to Nvidia hardware. Why didn't they use OpenCL and program the whole thing from scratch? I assumed that should be the case for mainframes like this. Two years in development and they use the standard API? With so many people they only had one guy assembling the cards?
    I'm not sure on the figures about processing power against power consumption and price. Is a GPU better for crunching in power consumption too?
    The idea of using the GPU as a "accelerator to make the computer run faster" is not new. But then as you mentioned, it would be more natural to use OpenCL (or other proven and standard API), but they have chosen to use a "specially designed OS".

    This approach is totally "off" (from the "normal" approach for using the GPU as accelerator). If I'm not mistaking, it seams they are not using those GPUs for delivering processing power (GPGPU), at least not as their main function. And it makes me wonder if they are using those 2GB fast GPU-memory as some kind of cache?. I guess the answer (which is really interesting) lies in what is going on with that "specially designed OS".
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 10-30-2009 at 03:55 AM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by twwen2 View Post
    Maybe not the US computer, but US encryption perhaps. Digital Fortress anyone?
    Yeah, AES be dare xd
    P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W

  17. #67
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    I updated the OP with some info about processors and graphics cards used, and also performance, cooling used, and its computing purposes.
    It is confirmed that it does use 4870x2.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    why are they saying it is a petascale supercomputer? it only gets 560 teraflops in linpack.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    why are they saying it is a petascale supercomputer? it only gets 560 teraflops in linpack.
    Can you run linpack on GPUs?


    Didn't think so.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Can you run linpack on GPUs?


    Didn't think so.
    as far as i am concerned it doesnt matter that the gpu's cant be used. you either can run the benchmark or you cant.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    They didn't build a supercomputer to benchmark linpack all day. So even if it couldn't run linpack at all, your point is still moot.

  22. #72
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    They didn't build a supercomputer to benchmark linpack all day. So even if it couldn't run linpack at all, your point is still moot.
    no one builds a supercomputer to run linpack. linpack is blas so its going to reach peak flops better than anything else and they arent getting in the top500 with out it. you dont know if it will be faster running the software for its intended purpose so how can you claim it will reach over a petaflop?

  23. #73
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    I'm not the one claiming a petaflop, the designers are. And they obviously aren't claiming over a petaflop in linpack. They designed it to be over a petaflop for a specific usage. Does it actually reach over a petaflop in that application? I don't know and I'm willing to bet that you don't either. But if it does then it's definitely a petaflop supercomputer, regardless of whatever it scores in linpack.

    You seem like a smart person so I'm kind of curious why you are so hung up on the linpack thing. Linpack isn't the only measure of flops in the entire universe. Sure, linpack is standard and the score won't get them into the top500. But they didn't build it to benchmark linpack or to get into the top500 - they built it to perform a certain type of computation and how good it is at that is the important thing.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    If Fermi powers that one:

    - Sir, we have a problem. the 5000 Fermi videocards we bought for our supercomputer...
    - ...... yes? What's the problem?
    - Wooden scre-
    - DAMN YOU JENSENNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn:::::::.:::: :...:..... .... . . (slowly disappearing scream)
    ahaha

    it will probably be used in a one time winner take all supercomputer crysis tournament, Fatal1ty vs. chinese gold farm.. or whoever is their best.


    on topic though i'm sure if this can help with early warning weather systems then that's great.
    Last edited by Gen; 11-02-2009 at 06:03 PM.

  25. #75
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    the computer can do more than one quadrillion calculations per second at its peak speed
    1.000.000.000.000.000 so in other words 1 peta flop... impressive...

    so while nvidia talks gpgpu, ati makes it happen?
    im curious though, how are they going to use the gpus?
    open cl?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •