MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 114

Thread: AMD Phenom II X4 965 - Revision C2 vs C3 comparison

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Actually there is NDA in place,until 4th of November .
    But the C3 are already for sale at a few places hehe...
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    But the C3 are already for sale at a few places hehe...
    Yeah I know,resellers screwed up i guess. Similar stuff happened with previous GPU launches from AMD,nothing new .

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    AMD's Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 Revision
    For one or the other reason, AMD's current desktop flagship CPU, that is the Deneb core-based Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition has had some power issues. Whereas every other AMD processor is rated at or below 125W TDP, the '965 Black Edition with its unlocked multipliers for core and North Bridge has been rated at 140W, enough to raise more than one eyebrow in the evermore energy conscious world. From a misconceptual point of view, the biggest issue is that TDP does not mean that the processor will actually draw that much power, rather the TDP acronym has undergone so many permutations that it is no longer really clear what it stands for. To sync everybody back to the same page, it is the thermal design power, that is the power requirement that has to be met by the voltage regulator module and the heatsink in order to warrant save operation of the CPU under any and all conditions - as long as they are reasonable.

    With the samples we had in our test labs, we never got even close to the 140W, in fact, we struggled to hit the 110W benchmark even if power was measured before the VRM which, given an efficacy in the order of 75-80% translates into maximum CPU power in the area of some 90W. It is self-understood that there have to be margins, especially when dealing with Taiwanese or Chinese motherboard manufacturers, at the same time, that 140W number has made the rounds and not helped AMD's reputation for power efficiency.

    Reason enough to introduce a new revision of the Phenom II with a few small but nonetheless important differences under the metal layers .....
    http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...id=68&Itemid=1

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •