Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 37

Thread: GeForce 210 and GT 220 Reviews

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

    GeForce 210 and GT 220 Reviews

    Today NVIDIA is releasing a set of products in a near silent fashion - this isn't a release that tends to get a lot of attention. And even though the idea of NVIDIA finally getting around to selling 40nm GPUs to the enthusiast is exciting, the GeForce 210 and GT 220 are really not targeted to that segment of users. Instead you'll find that NVIDIA's latest offering falls into the sub-$100 pricing and obviously will lack a lot of the performance of the GT200-series that we are used to seeing.

    What we are curious to understand is how well the two new GPUs compete against the AMD offerings at similar price points in terms of basic gaming performance and feature sets.
    http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=794
    http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3657
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforc...0-review-test/
    Last edited by onethreehill; 10-12-2009 at 03:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    112
    garbage.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    387
    wow 4670 destroys them both by a huge margin... and the 4670 is the mainstream gamers ideal gpu
    It should seem pretty obvious now that neither the GeForce 210 or the GeForce GT 220 are going to win any awards for performance. Not only that, but both of these cards are woefully underpowered when compared to AMD's previous generation Radeon HD 4670 graphics card that sells for LESS than the GT 220. NVIDIA is making a conscious decision here to not compete on the performance front as it seems obvious that they could make a faster chip (higher clocks, more shaders) and at least match the 4500/4600-series cards in our modest gaming tests. Instead they are pushing other aspects of their graphics technology in hopes to persued buyers.
    Seti@Home Optimized Apps
    Heat
    Quote Originally Posted by aNoN_ View Post
    pretty low score, why not higher? kingpin gets 40k in 3dmark05 and 33k in 06 and 32k in vantage performance...

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    That is one slow ass card, what is the point of it?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Nvidia

    Again why? GT220 is priced higher than a HD4670 which actually can play games at 1680x1050 with half-decent settings, while the GT220 crumble and die doing that.

    The only thing impressive about these new cards are that die-size I suppose to throw something positive in there... While these cards are aimed at the OEM market Nvidia really need to lower prices for these.

    Also what will happen when AMD has Redwood and Cedar out, oh....
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    684
    They might be able to sell the GT220 at $45 and the GT210 at $35. Any more than that and it will seat on the shelves.
    Last edited by SnipingWaste; 10-11-2009 at 09:30 PM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Mississippi
    Posts
    161
    Did they spell GT300 wrong
    Gigagyte Z68X-UD3P
    i7 2600k@4.6/1.35v
    GSkill Rippers 2133
    MSI 7870@1275/1450
    Antec Kuhler 920

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    wow these graphics cards are really impressive. With performance like this, even R900 could be in trouble.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    381
    What i find disturbing that the GT220 has exactly the same power like the ancient 8600GT/aka 9500 GT.

    Come one Nvidia, what design these gpus?

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bulgaria/Plovdiv
    Posts
    263
    may be you meant redesign

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Heh, too late, too expensive. GT300 please.
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    91
    This Fermi chip looks promising

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Downunder
    Posts
    1,313

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    im curious to if the 210 can beat a 4350.
    i dont think it can with just 16 cores.

    also interested to see a mobile version of 210 against the very popular mobile 4330
    Last edited by grimREEFER; 10-12-2009 at 01:16 AM.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    i wonder for how long they are gonna respin there beloved g80 series

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by grimREEFER View Post
    im curious to if the 210 can beat a 4350.
    i dont think it can with just 16 cores.
    It Fail on that




    http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,6...iewed/Reviews/

    This is just garbage. It Fail on Power consuption:
    G210 | HD 4350
    Power consumption Idle 8.7 Watt 7.2 Watt
    Power consumption Furmark 21.4 Watt 17.6 Watt

    It Fail on price also:
    Gigabyte tells us its GeForce GT 220 will set you back $79.99, while you can expect to nab the G210 for $44.99.
    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/17742
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts
    352
    What a POS of cards... even GT220 is obliterated by a HD4670, and the worst part it's that both GeForce cards has a higher power consumption in idle (obviously not in load, it would be absolutely ridiculous), so you get worse performance, worse value for your money, worse power characteristics, and even worse absolute price when talking about the GT220, from your comments.

    I suppose that PhysX is not a question talking about this cards (except as a secondary card... and even then...) because I doubt that if those are processing physics they are able to process at the same time more than 4 or 5 triangles per second, and that when it owes you the texture mapping for tomorrow.

    So is there any reason to buy one of them, apart from the real reason of existence of this cards? That is, of course, that OEM will buy them because they are NVIDIA, and NVIDIA as a brand sounds familiar to lots of Joes by there, so they buy a computer with "an NVIDIA card" thinking it's better. Brand recognition. Pffffh...

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Farinorco View Post
    What a POS of cards... even GT220 is obliterated by a HD4670, and the worst part it's that both GeForce cards has a higher power consumption in idle (obviously not in load, it would be absolutely ridiculous), so you get worse performance, worse value for your money, worse power characteristics, and even worse absolute price when talking about the GT220, from your comments.

    I suppose that PhysX is not a question talking about this cards (except as a secondary card... and even then...) because I doubt that if those are processing physics they are able to process at the same time more than 4 or 5 triangles per second, and that when it owes you the texture mapping for tomorrow.

    So is there any reason to buy one of them, apart from the real reason of existence of this cards? That is, of course, that OEM will buy them because they are NVIDIA, and NVIDIA as a brand sounds familiar to lots of Joes by there, so they buy a computer with "an NVIDIA card" thinking it's better. Brand recognition. Pffffh...
    believe me it will sale like hotcakes

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    believe me it will sale like hotcakes
    Proof that will happen?
    It will Fail. OEM aren´t that stupid. They have already stocks of the other better cards so why change?
    Nvidia will try to shift the older low-end to this new one. The problem is if that OEM shift from nvidia older low-end to ATI RV710 or in a few months to RV810 that have DX_11 support and not the New (LOL) DX_10.1 support.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    This has to be a joke...! Because ATi can easily drop the 4770 into $79 range and obliterate this lineup.
    Last edited by Xoulz; 10-12-2009 at 02:07 AM.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    208
    Sadder yet, the GT210 gets posterized by the 4650 which is 10$ cheaper after a mail in rebate. I'm fairly sure the 35$ 4650 can even toast up the 220. Tully a lamentable offering by Nvidia.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    germany-münster
    Posts
    375
    wow, these cards REALLY suck

    WTH did nvidia do in all these years?!
    system:

    Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
    xigmatek achilles
    sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
    Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
    8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
    x-fi xtrememusic
    rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
    320gb/250gb/500gb samsung

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    381
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    This has to be a joke...! Because ATi can easily drop the 4770 into $79 range and obliterate this lineup.
    it already does so with the 4670. like 2x time more fps, or even more....

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Florinmocanu View Post
    What i find disturbing that the GT220 has exactly the same power like the ancient 8600GT/aka 9500 GT.

    Come one Nvidia, what design these gpus?
    Nvidia The Way it's meant to be renamed!
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    I don't think there is a 4670 or 4770 thats half height so form factor means allot depending on application.

    The pricing on the 220 seems out of line with the target market on this card but I would imagine the price will drop swiftly.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •