Page 17 of 42 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 1035

Thread: The official GT300/Fermi Thread

  1. #401
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    Try a month to a month and a half.
    JHH wasn't even holding a real GF100 at the tesla launch. How in the name of god will that timeframe work?

  2. #402
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    So now that the Fermi card is a fake...does this mean that Jen-Hsun Huang will perform the Seppuku?
    WTF, this is exactly why AMD fan boys are the absolute worst, they don't know when the line is crossed between being a fan of a company and just being damn hateful.

    You want Jen-Hsun Huang to kill himself, then you put a smile face. WTF, thats ing evil.

    Anytime a company or person is remotely positive for NV, they are accused for being a fanboy. If this person has any power or any pull, this person is being accused of being paid off by NV. Even Fugger has been accused of being paid off recently.

    Man you guys, can't you just stay out of this AMD fans just stop posting in the NV crap in NV threads if your going to just say crap. I have never heard anything positive come from your guys mouths.

    Atleast most NV fanboys can say something positive about AMD every once in a while. You guys are just creating a negative atmosphere and making the mods to just give.

    The only thing negative about thing I have said about this latest generation is I don't see the 5870 is a worthy upgrade for someone who owns a 4870x2(which is me, and I also have a 4890), and eyefinity is kind of a novelty like 3d gaming because you have to pay alot of money to get it going(more screens), and I am accused of being an NV fanboy when I own a whole lot of AMD stuff.

  3. #403
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    Try a month to a month and a half.
    Dude, are you paying attention to whats going on around you..? The GT300 will not be out for the Xmas holiday shopping season..

    Nvidia concedes this, just read Anand's review of the Tesla architecture. ATi will have 3 months of un-fettered sales. When the GT300 is released, ATi will simply drop the prices on their current line-up and release (or announce) their X2 line, etc.. competing $ for $.



    Do you really think Nvidia will be able to compete with Hemlock (5870x2) @ $599, (come this January or Febuary...) when Nvidia is due to release their GT300.

    Or, a 5870 @ $299, or the GT300 for $499..? If Nvidia doesn't have a DX11 $199 part soon, they will loose massive market share and loose $Billions in stock. It doesn't matter how good the GT300 actually is, if only 40k uber-hardcore people ever buy it. The 5870, for the foreseeable future, is good enough for almost anyone needs.

    Millions of people will be buying or upgrading their stuff for the Holiday Season. Nvidia will miss out on all those sales.


    Timing is everything!

  4. #404
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    As promised, sticking to just news posts from here on in this thread.

    Not sure if it's been posted guys, but...
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/d...r_Q4_2009.html

    It's on track for Q4 '09 according to NVidia.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  5. #405
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by tdream View Post
    JHH wasn't even holding a real GF100 at the tesla launch. How in the name of god will that timeframe work?
    thats not an accurate way to speculate when a card will launch.
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Even Fugger has been accused of being paid off recently.
    its just kind of sad that people would go that far over an email.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cybercat View Post
    Well you know, ATI's the smaller company.

    Oh wait, no they're not, because they're part of AMD. NVIDIA's the one fighting the uphill battle here.
    indeed, they are going to get screwed over hard in the future if they dont stay ahead. they have to get in embedded markets because intel and amd will have their gpu's on die in pretty much anywhere they can put x86. its not right now that looks iffy for nvidia its in the next few years.im not really worried for them. they have some nice chips from tegra to tesla.

  6. #406
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    WTF, this is exactly why AMD fan boys are the absolute worst, they don't know when the line is crossed between being a fan of a company and just being damn hateful.

    You want Jen-Hsun Huang to kill himself, then you put a smile face. WTF, thats ing evil.
    It would be evil if he were serious. He's not literally suggesting the guy should suicide because of GT300 not yet being ready.

    No worries. The card will be ready when it's ready. We'll all still be here.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  7. #407
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    wafer costs are around 3000-5000 us$, so 30 chips per wafer = 100-166$ per gpu, pure die costs

    for rv870 it should be around 100 chips per wafer so 30-50$ per chip cost...

    these numbers are just examples, they arent accurate...
    but you can see, for a rough 50% transistor increase of gt300 over rv870, the costs more or less tripple...
    Yields..
    vary a lot depending on what libraries are used, logic or SRAM, etc.

    Pure specualtion, but we can infer somethings:
    - RV670 didn't have a "4830". - this suggests yields were very good.
    - RV770 both 4850 and 4870 at launch had 800 SIMD. Few "4830" and company instead opted for seperate 40nm die. Later revision clocks all the way to 1Ghz. - this suggests yields were spectacular
    - RV870.. notice for first time in many years the "050" part has cut down shaders etc. Even though die shrink, clockspeed about same. - this suggests yields are poor
    Now lets look at nVidia:
    - G80. Right away we see GTS variants. Suggests many defects on ROP or MEMCTRL.
    - G92. Launced as 112 shader 8800GT. Suggests yields quite poor initially. Couldn't even launch "full" part. But, later we get GTX, and GTX+ and only GTS250 on market. No cut down versions. This indicates yields improved a lot.
    - G200. Once again, cut down GTX260 and GTX275 versions. Notice how they "improved" the shaders on GTX260 to 216... yields gradually improving, but because of huge die, many sub-perfect parts.

    GT300.
    We know 3B transistors. We know 384bit. We know 512 CUDA cores. Thats it. Rumours about yields are just rumours.

    But, we do know 3B transistor chip will be bigger than RV870. And AMD launch suggests they are having yield problems. This suggests that *if* and *when* GT300 launches, it might be like G92 launch.

    To harvest more chips with defects, 'GTX' could launch with 480 SP, and the GT with 416 SP. Later, after several months, a "Ultra" can be launched with full 512 SP.

    Dont be surprised if this happens. They did it with 7800GTX/7800GT. 8800GTX/8800GTS, and ofcourse GTX280/GT260.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  8. #408
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    Or, a 5870 @ $299, or the GT300 for $499..? If Nvidia doesn't have a DX11 $199 part soon, they will loose massive market share and loose $Billions in stock. It doesn't matter how good the GT300 actually is, if only 40k uber-hardcore people ever buy it. The 5870, for the foreseeable future, is good enough for almost anyone needs.

    Millions of people will be buying or upgrading their stuff for the Holiday Season. Nvidia will miss out on all those sales.
    I think you're exaggerating quite a bit here. Several months without a $200 DX11 card isn't going to cause NVIDIA irreparable damage, or even the millions in lost sales that you claim. The simple truth is people aren't upgrading at the feverish rate that they used to, back when PC gamers had exclusives like HL2, Doom 3, Far Cry and UT2k4 to look forward to. It's not just that the 5870 is "good enough", because not a lot of people will be buying that card either, as it's still in the enthusiast price range. Rather, it's more because there aren't many upcoming bleeding-edge, AAA PC exclusives to galvanize sales.

    Besides, this is the first time NVIDIA's been late since 2002. I think they'll survive this generation.
    DFI LANParty DK 790FX-B
    Phenom II X4 955 BE (1003GPMW) @ 3.8GHz (19x200) w/1.36v
    -cooling: Scythe Mugen 2 + AC MX-2
    XFX ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024MB
    8GB PC2-6400 G.Skill @ 800MHz (1:2) 5-5-5-15 w/1.8v
    Seagate 1TB 7200.11 Barracuda
    Corsair HX620W


    Support PC gaming. Don't pirate games.

  9. #409
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Well, I don't know much about hotlots other than how risky they are. Respins usually take 6-8weeks to get back from TSMC, which means they will get it back the middle of Nov.

    So, best case for Nvidia if this next spin is good to go and they start ramping production, they might get a handful of wafers ready for the end of the year, like I said before, maybe a couple hundred cards.


    Again... you cannot use an 8+8pin on a "single" GPU, you will not pass PCI SIG certification.
    Totally agree about at most a hand full of wafers and couple hundred cards by Dec31/09.

    Too many people are idealistic and imagine that because they already have first silicon, its a simple matter to produce boards. While that may be true (making boards is easy), it would not be a sell-able product.

    Assuming perfectly working A1 silicon, you dont know its perfectly working until after 3-4 months of extensive testing. Remember, its not as simple as testing a new Coke bottle design, or a desk lamp. If customers indeed will be running scientific applications, all math functionality must be tested precisely. And lets not forget compatiblity with hundreds of monitors, games, engineering and graphic applications. Although some of this can be "dismissed" and fixed in driver later on.

    So forgive me if when I see somebody post "board Nov12 - confirmed" that I roll over in laughter.

    [EDIT:
    To add to what Cybercat said, many people **only** have 20" 1680x1050 displays. Even 8800GT is fine for that with most games. Most people are not crazy obsessive MUST have 8xAA working or x_x... very very few people even have 2560x1600. Last gen (GTX275/4890) already pushes 50+ at 19x10 in virtually every game WITH AA. And its a lot simpler and cheaper to disable a few quality settings than to wait and spend $$$ just to play a $49 game.]
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 10-03-2009 at 07:58 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  10. #410
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    - G92. Launced as 112 shader 8800GT. Suggests yields quite poor initially. Couldn't even launch "full" part. But, later we get GTX, and GTX+ and only GTS250 on market. No cut down versions. This indicates yields improved a lot.
    8800 GT which got renamed to 9800GT which almost got renamed to a GTS230 or GTS240
    then we got 8800GTS which got renamed to 9800GTX which got renamed to 9800GTX+ when overclocked which got renamed to an GTS 250.

  11. #411
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    As promised, sticking to just news posts from here on in this thread.

    Not sure if it's been posted guys, but...
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/d...r_Q4_2009.html

    It's on track for Q4 '09 according to NVidia.
    “The first Fermi GPUs are expected to launch by year’s end,” stressed Mr. Alibrandi.

    What exactly is meant by "launch"? And then there is the word expected tossed in. Leaves a lot of wiggle room for Nvidia IMO. When Nvidia gives an actual launch/end NDA date, then we can all sit back and expect it. Until then, no one really knows. People are understandably skeptical after the mock up stunt Nvidia pulled.

  12. #412
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    “The first Fermi GPUs are expected to launch by year’s end,” stressed Mr. Alibrandi.

    What exactly is meant by "launch"? And then there is the word expected tossed in. Leaves a lot of wiggle room for Nvidia IMO. When Nvidia gives an actual launch/end NDA date, then we can all sit back and expect it. Until then, no one really knows. People are understandably skeptical after the mock up stunt Nvidia pulled.
    I think people tend to forget, that Nvidia has a share price to Nurse, and to take all "Expected" dates with that in mind... Delays = share price fall, so they as a company have to spin news as much as they can legally, to keep investor confidence up. They may launch some December 31 for posterity, but I think Jan Feb realistically is when we ll see quantity.
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

  13. #413
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    probably they meant soft launch i don't expect anything special from nvidia this year

  14. #414
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    highend mainboards can usually supply more than 100W through the slot
    Note that slot power and 6/8pin power can never be used to power the same load, thus if a card has an external plug which always provides for GPU VRMs, then slot power cannot be used for powering the same load.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  15. #415
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    As promised, sticking to just news posts from here on in this thread.

    Not sure if it's been posted guys, but...
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/d...r_Q4_2009.html

    It's on track for Q4 '09 according to NVidia.
    didnt THEY say the other day its Q1 and midrange will be "many many months" getting confused now, I reckon late Q4 maybe just before x-mas (if there clever if not just after new year)
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  16. #416
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843
    3every thread that has to do something with nvidia marketing/physx/sales every ATi fanboy has to get their bashing in and the threads end up being 10+ pages long.
    If in trying to defend the defenseless, nvidia fanboys didn't make an absurd amount of absurd posts, the threads would be smaller.

    I find it funny how quickly they went from zealots to emmo. "leave nvidia alone", "ATI fans are Bad", "I won't post more" kinda remind me this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc

  17. #417
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts
    352
    Oh man, I hate when things turn to a discussion over "why ATi is right and NVIDIA not? You're ATi... You're NVIDIA... you only say that because of hatred... you only say that because of love"... it makes keep the thread so difficult...

    I'd like to imagine for a moment that those names belong to a pair of companies that make products for us to buy, like Philips, LG, Woxter, :banana::banana::banana:or, Sony... not to some charismatic heroes of an epic world, or something.

    Quote Originally Posted by To(V)bo Co(V)bo View Post
    here too is a comparison to crunching on guru.

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...review-test/25
    But that comparison is not really a useful one because they are not comparing the same applications / code in different hw, but different code on different hw (note that ATI cards are running code in ATi Stream while NVIDIA cards are running code in CUDA, so that means that the code they are running is different). That's similar to compare the Windows loading time with 2 ssd's (A and B) using Windows XP in ssd A and Windows Vista in ssd B.

    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    1. I love how they leave out RV770, the real competition to GT200, and

    2. That is single precision. GT300 will decimate RV870 in double precision.
    They are testing HD5870, which is the reviewed card. They are using the most powerful NVIDIA solution, to compare. Which is exactly the point to include the RV770? About the GT300 decimating RV870 in double precision, we will see. That's too much fortune-telling for me. On the other hand I'm not all that interested in the applications that can get a benefit from double precision, since domestic applications and the kind of professional applications that may be useful to me, shouldn't do much about double precision floats.

  18. #418
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    473
    What does ati better/worse have to do with this thread, keep it on topic please
    CPU: Intel 2500k (4.8ghz)
    Mobo: Asus P8P67 PRO
    GPU: HIS 6950 flashed to Asus 6970 (1000/1400) under water
    Sound: Corsair SP2500 with X-Fi
    Storage: Intel X-25M g2 160GB + 1x1TB f1
    Case: Sivlerstone Raven RV02
    PSU: Corsair HX850
    Cooling: Custom loop: EK Supreme HF, EK 6970
    Screens: BenQ XL2410T 120hz


    Help for Heroes

  19. #419
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodkin View Post
    What does ati better/worse have to do with this thread, keep it on topic please
    because ATi has a competing product to GF100.

  20. #420
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    because ATi has a competing product to GF100.
    Yeah it does, but gf100 has nothing to do with TWIMTBP when we are looking at it from a technical standpoint. All the bickering should go to the batman thread or one in the GPU section, not a news thread
    CPU: Intel 2500k (4.8ghz)
    Mobo: Asus P8P67 PRO
    GPU: HIS 6950 flashed to Asus 6970 (1000/1400) under water
    Sound: Corsair SP2500 with X-Fi
    Storage: Intel X-25M g2 160GB + 1x1TB f1
    Case: Sivlerstone Raven RV02
    PSU: Corsair HX850
    Cooling: Custom loop: EK Supreme HF, EK 6970
    Screens: BenQ XL2410T 120hz


    Help for Heroes

  21. #421
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodkin View Post
    keep it on topic please
    No one should post anything but news here then. Let's let this thread sink for the next few weeks and forget about this all.

  22. #422
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Why don't we just bash nVIDIA 'til they finally release something ?
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  23. #423
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Anyone see this? I don't know if it's real or not.
    http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...&postcount=112
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #424
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    Yields..
    vary a lot depending on what libraries are used, logic or SRAM, etc.

    Pure specualtion, but we can infer somethings:
    - RV670 didn't have a "4830". - this suggests yields were very good.
    - RV770 both 4850 and 4870 at launch had 800 SIMD. Few "4830" and company instead opted for seperate 40nm die. Later revision clocks all the way to 1Ghz. - this suggests yields were spectacular
    - RV870.. notice for first time in many years the "050" part has cut down shaders etc. Even though die shrink, clockspeed about same. - this suggests yields are poor
    Now lets look at nVidia:
    - G80. Right away we see GTS variants. Suggests many defects on ROP or MEMCTRL.
    - G92. Launced as 112 shader 8800GT. Suggests yields quite poor initially. Couldn't even launch "full" part. But, later we get GTX, and GTX+ and only GTS250 on market. No cut down versions. This indicates yields improved a lot.
    - G200. Once again, cut down GTX260 and GTX275 versions. Notice how they "improved" the shaders on GTX260 to 216... yields gradually improving, but because of huge die, many sub-perfect parts.

    GT300.
    We know 3B transistors. We know 384bit. We know 512 CUDA cores. Thats it. Rumours about yields are just rumours.

    But, we do know 3B transistor chip will be bigger than RV870. And AMD launch suggests they are having yield problems. This suggests that *if* and *when* GT300 launches, it might be like G92 launch.

    To harvest more chips with defects, 'GTX' could launch with 480 SP, and the GT with 416 SP. Later, after several months, a "Ultra" can be launched with full 512 SP.

    Dont be surprised if this happens. They did it with 7800GTX/7800GT. 8800GTX/8800GTS, and ofcourse GTX280/GT260.
    very nice post, thx, and also thx for bringing this thread back on topic!

    and yes, i agree, i wouldnt be surprised if nvidia launches a cut down gpu card first. all they need right now is to beat a 5870 and a possible overclocked rv870 aka 5890... if they dont need all sps for that, they probably wont enable all sps initially.

    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Note that slot power and 6/8pin power can never be used to power the same load, thus if a card has an external plug which always provides for GPU VRMs, then slot power cannot be used for powering the same load.
    oh really? hmmm thx i didnt know that...
    im confused though, what do cards use the slot power for then?
    memory pwm? but 75W for memory, isnt that way too much?

    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Anyone see this? I don't know if it's real or not.
    http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...&postcount=112

  25. #425
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Anyone see this? I don't know if it's real or not.
    http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...&postcount=112
    Yep, looks real

    But a 20 pin is rather too old, they should have use the 24 pin connector instead The USB ports are a added plus add a gamepad on ur GPU it self lesser latency related lag
    Coming Soon

Page 17 of 42 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •