MMM
Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 288

Thread: HD 5700s pictures & benchmarks

  1. 10-02-2009, 03:14 AM #26
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    Ok, ok I stand corrected

    I have to agree on this...

    HD4770: 640 Shaders, 32 tmus, 750mhz GPU, 800mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit
    HD5750: 1120 shaders, 56 tmus, 700mhz GPU, 1150mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit

    Anyone else think that this has to be early driver issues? There is no way I can believe these synthetics are anywhere close to it's true performance, also the CPU used was a Dual-Core downclocked to 2GHz? I meen it's also competing against GTX260 and GTX275.

    HD5000 isn't scaling as it should... coult it be driver issues or something going on with the architecture reaching it's limit?
    hmmmmm yes thats even more obvious than the 5870 to 4890 comparison...
    and then compare the 5750 to the 5850 and 5870... again there seems to be no real scaling from adding more blocks...

    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-02-2009, 03:30 AM #27
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    hmmmmm yes thats even more obvious than the 5870 to 4890 comparison...
    and then compare the 5750 to the 5850 and 5870... again there seems to be no real scaling from adding more blocks...

    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    My bet is driver issues and possibly that underclocked CPU... atleast I hope so. Waiting proper reviews, if this thing really is this bad it's a HD5850 for me...
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-02-2009, 03:39 AM #28
    mk_dir
    mk_dir is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    158
    Send a message via MSN to mk_dir
    Better specs than expected, a GPU like that can beat any RV770.
    P6T DELUXE V2 / I7 920 D0 @ 4.2GHZ Corsair H50 / TRIDENT 2GHZ CL8 / INTEL X25-M / ASUS EAH5850 / HX620W
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-02-2009, 03:40 AM #29
    geo
    geo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by froste View Post
    I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*
    i think that was 5750 benchmark
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-02-2009, 03:42 AM #30
    Anemic
    Anemic is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    722
    Nice =)
    But what about pricing?
    Last edited by Anemic; 10-02-2009 at 03:47 AM.
    Loonym...You are missed.

    The element of one

    Breathe me in
    Breathe me in

    I disbelieve in separation. I close my eyes to see you.
    This is for you, everything I am. This is for you, take it from me.
    I, I disbelieve separation. I close my eyes
    there's no escaping me
    This is for you, everything I am. This is for you, take it from me.
    In your heart in your soul. I perceive rejuvenation

    Breathe me in. I am forever. Deep within I am eternal.

    I will return to you. I am with you always. I will never turn away from you.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-02-2009, 03:47 AM #31
    LaMpiR
    LaMpiR is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Posts
    423
    Send a message via MSN to LaMpiR
    So 5770 will have similar performance like 4870? I like this
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-02-2009, 03:54 AM #32
    Calmatory
    Calmatory is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by LaMpiR View Post
    So 5770 will have similar performance like 4870? I like this
    Between HD4870 and HD4890. Sometimes more, sometimes less.

    Without AF there should be a really nice performance boost due to memory bandwidth bottleneck. AF is quite bandwidth heavy, so without it the perf should go up very nicely. On the other hand, the performance is going to "crawl" with AF. Again, depending on the rest of the hardware, game and actual situation in the game.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-02-2009, 04:30 AM #33
    eric66
    eric66 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    GDDR5
    still not enough i expected 192 bit at least damn this card has some fine specs
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-02-2009, 05:23 AM #34
    Calmatory
    Calmatory is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    still not enough i expected 192 bit at least damn this card has some fine specs
    Someone should do a table with a few games which shows the performance with different amounts of memory bandwidth.

    But meh, I guess it all comes down to guessing how "bandwidth starved" the card is. E.g. "128-bit bus" -> "Ok it sucks!".
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-02-2009, 06:25 AM #35
    Jamesrt2004
    Jamesrt2004 is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Send a message via MSN to Jamesrt2004
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    cant be THAT much of a diff tbh cos honestly wasn't ati like 90% ready for dx11 anyways ?? and its pretty much the "same" core in a nutshell :/ so imo it should perfeorm vaguely the same...

    im oits the cpu.. who downclocks to 2ghz .. when most people benching with i7's at 4~4.2
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-02-2009, 06:30 AM #36
    Miwo
    Miwo is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    Send a message via AIM to Miwo
    Something is definitely off with that performance, but the specs are not bad at all.

    Still, for $199 on the 5770, you mind as well spend $60 more and get 1GB DDR5, and double the bandwidth. Have a feeling most 577x cards are going to be 512MB

    'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
    'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
    'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster

    Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
    HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-02-2009, 06:33 AM #37
    Miwo
    Miwo is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    Send a message via AIM to Miwo
    CPU is not underclocked..... its just Speedstep on an e8400 bumps it down to 6x333 @ stock idle

    'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
    'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
    'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster

    Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
    HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-02-2009, 06:36 AM #38
    Jamesrt2004
    Jamesrt2004 is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Send a message via MSN to Jamesrt2004
    Quote Originally Posted by Miwo View Post
    CPU is not underclocked..... its just Speedstep on an e8400 bumps it down to 6x333 @ stock idle
    ahh my bad. well still just odd benches. i still put it down to his setup till i see some more reputable source benching the cards
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-02-2009, 06:38 AM #39
    Manicdan
    Manicdan is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    anyone else wondering what kind of idle/max power this will use?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-02-2009, 07:00 AM #40
    Wiggy McShades
    Wiggy McShades is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    738
    Is there any chance 4770 will have a larger memory interface? seems like these cards could be a perfect replacement for my gtx260's i'd just be a little bit worried about memory bandwidth limitations.
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    real men like the idea of packing lots of stuff into a very small space, which is what the mac mini is
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    PS. I'm even tougher IRL.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-02-2009, 07:22 AM #41
    Helloworld_98
    Helloworld_98 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Guys, this is Cypress, not Juniper, the 57's are bad cypress cores.

    hence why I'm hoping that the SP unlocker will work with the 57's, 5870 power for $150
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-02-2009, 07:23 AM #42
    Manicdan
    Manicdan is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    Guys, this is Cypress, not Juniper, the 57's are bad cypress cores.

    hence why I'm hoping that the SP unlocker will work with the 57's, 5870 power for $150
    the chip looks very tiny, no way its unlockable.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 10-02-2009, 07:56 AM #43
    jaredpace
    jaredpace is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    Guys, this is Cypress, not Juniper, the 57's are bad cypress cores.
    No, this is Juniper, a different die.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 10-02-2009, 08:29 AM #44
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades View Post
    Is there any chance 4770 will have a larger memory interface? seems like these cards could be a perfect replacement for my gtx260's i'd just be a little bit worried about memory bandwidth limitations.
    There won't be any "limitations" on this card in games... It has higher bandwidth than HD4770 and HD4850 so it should do ok...

    Can't wait for real proper reviews to show up, something is wrong with this. There is no way it performs this bad with those kinds of specs.
    Last edited by Smartidiot89; 10-02-2009 at 08:32 AM.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 10-02-2009, 08:47 AM #45
    Manicdan
    Manicdan is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    it looks like alot of the 5xxx cards are under performing, i wonder if they have too much stuff and just need higher frequencys
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 10-02-2009, 09:00 AM #46
    Helloworld_98
    Helloworld_98 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    it looks like alot of the 5xxx cards are under performing, i wonder if they have too much stuff and just need higher frequencys
    it's probably the drivers, and by Q2 2010 we'll probably see a 20 to 30% performance increase.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 10-02-2009, 09:11 AM #47
    Glow9
    Glow9 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Whats the performance difference between this and a 5850
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 10-02-2009, 09:12 AM #48
    Manicdan
    Manicdan is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    it's probably the drivers, and by Q2 2010 we'll probably see a 20 to 30% performance increase.
    yeah im not impressed with the performance relative to the amount of change. i could either buy a 5850 for 260+$, or a second 4850 for 100$ and be just as happy.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 10-02-2009, 09:23 AM #49
    largon
    largon is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    anyone else wondering what kind of idle/max power this will use?
    Should be something like 10-15W idle, 50W load.
    You were not supposed to see this.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 10-02-2009, 09:24 AM #50
    Manicdan
    Manicdan is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Should be something like 10-15W idle, 50W load.
    50W load wouldnt need any PCIe connector at all would it?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules