The E0 Q9550 SLB9V thread (finally!)

[rurik]

That's not to high of temps for air cooling and when you run games etcedera your temps will not be nearly that high, no program tortures CPUs like Linx code. I think if you hone everything in a little more you will be suprised about how your temps go up, I'm guessing you will hit 80C~. I think you might have some settings off a little but, you are pretty close to honed in though. I am basing this off just looking at that screen shot though. You need to watch your temps like I had mentioned earlier, they speak volumes.

btw,I waiting a Giga EP45T-UD3P and I hope,4Ghz I will receive wihtout any problems. and that Im posting my results.

[truehighroller]

btw,I waiting a Giga EP45T-UD3P and I hope,4Ghz I will receive wihtout any problems. and that Im posting my results.

It is a sweet board.

[Unrealer]

What I did was get it semi stable or boot-able then tweak one setting up and down until I could see / feel what spot was more, stable again just by watching my temps while running burntest for the most part then leave that setting at the best spot and go to the next one and do the same thing. The FSB Term has different names, it depends on the board. I'm sorry I don't know all the names.

It was the fastest I have ever been able to set all my settings, honestly. So, if your CPU GTLs were the most stable say at 63 because .67 was 2 minutes and lets just say you went to .59 as well and it was one minute then stay at .63 and move to the next one. I think if you were to watch your temps while benching you would see what I am talking about.

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v
Northbridge GTL: 0.67 (posible values: 0.61 & 0.67, with 0.67 is unstable)



Posible values:


testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 57
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 67



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 57




Thats all for now....

[MrDucky]

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v
Northbridge GTL: 0.67 (posible values: 0.61 & 0.67, with 0.67 is unstable)



Posible values:


testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 57
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 67



CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 57




Thats all for now....

wow high northbridge and vtt ... but nice results

[Unrealer]

wow high northbridge and vtt ... but nice results

dont quote the images please....

[ju-rek]

Q9550 E0 batch L848C436
Asus P5Q-E
GTL0/2 - 0,67
GTL1/3 - 0,65
VPLL - 1,52
VTT - 1,22
VDDR - 2,00
VNB - 1,24
VSB - 1,1
VPCI - 1,5

[truehighroller]

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v




Posible values:

testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61



Thats all for now....

That setting there looked to be your most stable spot for you from what I am looking at. I think your motherboard just can't handle much more at this point. You should get the UD3P motherboard board for higher FSB on that chip. In other words that might be the highest GFlops your motherboard will let your CPU push it looks like... that is if, everything is stable.

[MrDucky]

i finaly got the cpu of my brother does anny one had 500FSB x 8.5 on a normal voltage :|?

[Unrealer]

In other words that might be the highest GFlops your motherboard will let your CPU push it looks like... that is if, everything is stable.

But why i have that score? 4Ghz are 4Ghz....

[Leeghoofd]

not alone to do with ya total cpu speed, include ram speed, FSB, total ram tested etc...

[truehighroller]

True he was testing the same amount of ram as I was 1024 but and speed at one point as well, I don't know what his other settings are though.

[Zucker2k]

It could be performance level too, plus cpu could be throttling from heat if the chip exceeds 71c and thermal control isn't disabled in bios.

[Unrealer]

Another E0 (the right one):



The VID is 1.22v, instead of 1.26v of the other.
And is cooler, around 4-5º less:

plus cpu could be throttling from heat if the chip exceeds 71c and thermal control isn't disabled in bios.

Nope, around 60-65º al max with Linx.

[DAAS]

Got an Q9550 sinds 2 little weeks.

My Goal was a min of 3800mhz becos i hade a Q6600 @ 3400mhz already.

This was my first atempt

Bios :
Fsb : 459
pci : 101
Mem : 1/1
Vcore @ 1.2.56
Mch @ 1.3.40
Ram @2.1




So went furter with this :

Fsb : 471
Pci : 101
Mem : 1/1 5/5/5/15
Vcore @ 1.2.625
Mch @ 1.3.60
Ram @ 2.1




This is all on my shiny new Gigabyte p45 board.

I m looking forward for the 4100mhz.

Tips are welcome





DER.DAAS

[phsinc1]

@DAAS

You can try to lower your MCH Core to 1.32v @ 471 FSB

What CPU Termination and PLL you use?

Can you post screenshot from ET6 settings

[DAAS]

All the rest of the settings are set @ normal in bios i didnt touch anything just putted them on normal what the Gigabyte Ud3 uses.

Is this enough info ore shall i look later this weekend for the exact numbers ?

And shall try out the Mch lowering.




DER.DAAS

[kagula323]

HI. I've just installed my Q9550 vid 1.2625 . Can u post some 4GHZ templates I could use for a start? Until now I've only used dual core procesor on my EP45-UD3P. The rest of the build is EP45-UD3P, GSKILL F2-9600 2x2GB DDR2 1200, GEF 9500GT 1GB, Cooler Master Real Power 700W.
Thank's in advance

[Kain665]

Guys, help me out here! I just lapped my Q9550 (SLB8V, L847C208), and it dropped my temps down 5-6c. But at 1.288v at 460x8.5, My temps are 78-73-68-68 degrees under prime small FFT. Core 2 seems to be always 4-5c cooler than core 1 and cores 3 and 4 seem to always be ~10c cooler than core 1. Is this normal? I mean, I'm using a Big Typhoon and only 1.288v...

At 1.312v and 475x8.5, core 1 hit 85c!

[MrDucky]

it seems you didn't lapp it good. maybe you pushed to hard on the cpu u need to let the cpu do the work not your own strength

[Kain665]

I'm using a Big Typhoon, might that be the problem?

[MrDucky]

You could check if its flat if its not then you can lap it to

[Kain665]

It is flat, it's been lapped. I mean, is the BT enough for it? I don't think that an U120 would be 20 degrees cooler!

[MrDucky]

then i think your temp sensors are broken are they still the same temps as before?

[truehighroller]

then i think your temp sensors are broken are they still the same temps as before?

Or it could be his GTLs are not set right `100%. I think he should try to mess with those before throwing in the towel. I mentioned this a couple pages back. GTLs directly affect your CPU temps. Watch your temps after changing a GTL setting and while in mid intelburntest or linx testing and you will see what I am talking about. You want to try to settle your GTL settings where the temps are the highest and most even for all cores and your CPU passes the test of course.

[Kain665]

That is interesting, Never knew GTLs could have such a big effect. I will mess around with those in a little bit, I should be getting my Megahalem in the mail today. Right now it is happy at .66 for both cores.