AMD Radeon HD 5870 Video Card Overclocking
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1090/1/
thanks for posting the thread OTH, you always start decent threads, interesting re amd gpu clock tool, yes the ati overdrive goes blank when you exceed the ati overdrive max clocks which i think on reference is 900mhz so once they went above 900 the ati overdrive is blank same as on the 4890's , lets hope wizzard gets the techpowerup gputool up and running on the 5800 series as it worked flawlessly for me with 3 x 4890s in crossfire, and adjusting voltage up to 1.45 volts was straight forward using the techpowerup gpu tool on the 4890's and accordingly the 5800 seies are good for over 1000 on core with a voltage increase
The techpowerup review has tons of numbers with 5870s and 5850s in crossfire.
But I'm always baffled by W1zzard listing no CUDA and PhysX as cons for ATI cards. Perhaps Nvidia cards get no ATI Stream support listed as their cons?![]()
if nv doesnt support opencl then they'll get "no opencl support". opencl isnt even out yet
a lot of people at universities use cuda for their crunching because it's the only thing that works and is cross platform
physx is part of a few titles like batman, might matter for some people
nv will get "no dx 11" on their cards even though there is zero use for it today
Thats not a 'con' as such - thats stating the flaming obvious - we KNOW that ATI doesn't do PhysX or CUDA, and we KNOW that nVidia doesnt do OpenCL or Eyefinity.
It's just nit picking for the sake of it.
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
@GLENBOY
You are welcome
AMD laat ATI HD 5870 met DirectX 11 los
http://tweakers.net/reviews/1390/amd...tx-11-los.html
My sister, her 3 kids her housband, has no idea what the difference is.
Just a typical average buyer, never know what they actually get and what the cards can do.
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
Obviously he does need to put this on reviews, because people are more confused than they seem...Yourself included.
NVidia supports OpenCL... Much like OpenGL and OpenAL it's an open standard. If it didn't support NVidia hardware just because it was NVidia hardware when it's perfectly capable of doing the work, then it wouldn't be an open standard and as such wouldn't be part of the Open Library family.
Havok is 100% software based, and ever since Intel bought havok we haven't heard a THING about havok FX. By this point, we all may as well consider it canceled or shelved. HavokFX was slated to be able to run on both NVidia and ATi cards, and as such you couldn't use it as a con for NVidia.
Of course, considering intel bought Havok during the days that intel was trying to tell gamers that cpu meant more than gpu(funny how that panned out, no?) it's pretty much common knowledge that havok fx will never see the light of day. To this day, not a single game has ever used Havok FX.
Now, the reason why lack of cuda and physx support are cons for ATi is because both are used in the industry. Maybe not as widely used as they could be, but they ARE used none the less. As such, a lack of support for those features is still a con![]()
So he needs to put lack of ATI Stream in Nvidia card reviews because it use in the industry![]()
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
Couldn't agree more. I had a fun "argument" with a customer once about their 8500GT 1GB being the hot stuff and how that by suggesting he purchase a 512MB ATI product instead (HD 4770 ;the best and fastest card we carried at the time ) that I was as informed and intelligent as a cave hermit. I believe I was told by him that ATI cards licked his balls.... These kind of people never cease to crack me up.
Anyone who takes the time to become informed however usually has a fair understanding of all the terms thrown up in the air and whats relevant and whats not. (eg showing Crysis as a game example on the box of a low end gpu ; That is correct Sir! That there 8500GT will "pwnzor" Crysis hardcores because it has 1337GBs of 128bit GDDR2s and they show epic screen shots of it on the back of the box! "
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
Wow, the HD5870 is cheaper than 295 and performs almost the same.
Sadly I won't be able to upgrade since I need to replace my current rig with better hardware.
HD5870 will be bottlenecked by the q6600@3.4 ? isn't it ?
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 L807A
TRUE-120 / Scythe ULTRA Kaze
Gigabyte EP45-DS3
G.Skill PC2-6400 8GB (4*2GB) PQ
Sapphire HD4870
2* Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB
Samsung EcoGreen F1 1TB
Western Digital Green 1TB
Enermax Noisetaker II 600watts
LG L226WTP-BF 22-Inch
Gigabyte 3D Aurora 570
Apple MacBook MB402LL/A
![]()
There isn't a game out right now that the Q6600 can't keep up with the 5870 once the rez and AA are turned on when it comes to staying above your monitors refresh rate...
Seriously...
The Q6 series, Q9 series, and AMD Phenom II's are all FINE for gaming. You don't need an i7 to play games just because it's the fastest thing out there.![]()
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
So many people on here always seem to forget that Light...
From personal experience, I can say the Q6600 as low as 3.2ghz, or a phenom at 3.2-3.6 play games perfectly fine. Sure, I'm not playing with a 5870, but fact is if you want an idea of if the cpu will bottleneck you too far drop the resolution as far as it will possibly go with no AA/AF and see if the framerate is to low for you... If it's not, then your cpu isn't going to hold you back.
That is, assuming you have a card that can reach your cpu's limit of course... Obviously if you're trying crysis and you have an HD2900 you're still not going anywhere near what your cpu is capable of.
According to testing with the GTX 295 and cpu scaling, the only game that scaled more than like 2-4 fps at high resolution was UT3, and it was STILL over 100fps on all the quads IIRC. Only the old school A64x2's had issues staying when it came to this.
The point of it all was just that there's no need for someone with a Q6600 at 3.4 to upgrade to an i7 just to buy a 5870.
Fact is, any of those 3 processor series are still fine and dandy for gaming. I know I have no intention of upgrading from my q6600 any time soon.
AMD Demos Dual Cypress Graphics Card - Hemlock
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-demo....html?doc=7718
Bookmarks