MMM
Page 5 of 22 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 526

Thread: HD5870 and HD5850 Reviews

  1. #101
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    547
    All these people saying its less than they expected.... are already running 4870x2's and 295's!

    Well DUH. Of course that means it's not a worthy upgrade (with no dx11 titles yet, assuming you don't want multi monitor).

    But I don't think for anyone who has an older card that there is a more sensible option.. given you can crossfire later (who's going to run 2x295's? :p)

    5870 = 4870x2 is huge. Maybe you're all at the bleeding edge and its nothing to you, but I'm not. I've got a 7000 series in the server and a 2600 in my laptop.... if you were me, looking for a grand upgrade, what would you buy? :p
    Last edited by gumballguy; 09-22-2009 at 09:10 PM.

  2. #102
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    God reading through the Anandtech review, I had no idea how many things got added into DX11 and I'm sure the HTPC users will be happy to know that we can use protected audio through it *finally*!

  3. #103
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    681
    This is pretty good news for ATI:

    - Fastest single-card solution (likely to be comparable to GT300 even if slower).
    - By far the best energy performance of any card. This adds significant value to the card, making it quieter and cheaper to run over the long term (lower khws drawn for computing and A/C).
    - Drivers will likely increase the performance of the card a substantial amount over time.
    - DX11 games will increase the gap between 5870 and 295. (This does make the comparison with GT300 more important.)

    In sum, this is the best product you can currently buy. GT300 can potentially best it in FPS, but ATI has created a serious competitor that is signficantly faster, more efficient, and reasonably priced AT LAUNCH, which is guaranteed to become cheaper and faster due to drivers over time...nVidia is going to have a hell of a time competing here.

  4. #104
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    421
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...on-hd5870.html
    nice low power use
    14.7 idle
    25.8 2d
    107 3dm06
    161.3 futurmark

  5. #105
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Machinus View Post
    This is pretty good news for ATI:

    - Fastest single-card solution (likely to be comparable to GT300 even if slower).
    - By far the best energy performance of any card. This adds significant value to the card, making it quieter and cheaper to run over the long term (lower khws drawn for computing and A/C).
    - Drivers will likely increase the performance of the card a substantial amount over time.
    - DX11 games will increase the gap between 5870 and 295. (This does make the comparison with GT300 more important.)

    In sum, this is the best product you can currently buy. GT300 can potentially best it in FPS, but ATI has created a serious competitor that is signficantly faster, more efficient, and reasonably priced AT LAUNCH, which is guaranteed to become cheaper and faster due to drivers over time...nVidia is going to have a hell of a time competing here.
    LoL exactly, I m not sure what people were expecting, especially with Launch Drivers... I see big potential still, you have it beating the x2 in most cases and the 295gtx in many... doing it quieter, and as a single card solution.. pretty impressive.
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

  6. #106
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Sh1tyMcGee View Post
    Id wait for XFX, Sapphire's support and warranty sucks.
    Zipzoomfly has it at $399.

    http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/Produc...tCode=10011222

    Sold out while I was writing this though. With bing cashback puts it at $388 shipped.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  7. #107
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    The XFX model is in stock at NCIX in Canada for $429CND ($20 instant rebate) If I were to get one, this would be the one I'd get. I just can't justify spending upwards of 400 dollars on a card that is slower in many cases just for the sake of power usage and noise.

    For those looking to upgrade a card that is more than a generation old however, they look to be quite nice. As has been mentioned in a few of the reviews, it still remains to be seen how DX11 and OpenCL will fair. I personally expect DX11 to outperform DX10 if its done right but we shall see.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  8. #108
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad1723 View Post
    I will correct you, it's not. It's just 2 times the shaders of the 4870/4890, so people assumed it was a dual core GPU...
    Well let's see when pcgh provides a microstutter review sometime in the future and debunk the myth.

  9. #109
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    162
    are ppl forgetting the 9800gx2 beat the ati 4870 and gtx 280 pretty handily when they came out..
    dunno what ppl were expecting, I think the performance of this card is blazing, the price is good, the features are great.

  10. #110
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    I've been a computer nerd since the Vic20 back in 1983!

    I really find it hard to believe people are knocking this card, it's frikken awesome and ~$150 less than what the GTX295 was yesterday...

    FWIW, I learned my lesson about staying on the cutting edge of video cards, it's a really expensive proposition!

    I love the 5870!! I bought a 4870 Saturday for $129...

    I'm a Happy Camper.
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  11. #111
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
    LoL exactly, I m not sure what people were expecting, especially with Launch Drivers... I see big potential still, you have it beating the x2 in most cases and the 295gtx in many... doing it quieter, and as a single card solution.. pretty impressive.
    I see this launch as an opportunity for NV, the door is left really wide open because the gap is not nearly big enough.

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3643&p=17

    If you ignore resident evil(37%) and Dawn of war II(loses by 4%), the gap between CF 5870 and GTX 285 SLI is between 10-20% ahead for the 5870cf.

    This is all speculations but..

    If the GTX 380 is indeed 510 shaders vs 240 and higher clocks than the gtx 285 and they improve the AA algorithm which has been long overdue for the company and other things coming with the new architechture(since it is said to be new), I can see a GTX 380 possibly being as fast as a CF 5870 or a 5870x2. If this happens(and it is a big if), NV will be able to charge as much as they want for the gtx 380. And similarly a gtx 395 will be untouchable. I know its the halo, and people don't spend the most money there(volume), but its enough to make the 5870 crumble in price which is a good thing. It also gives NV room to attack the 5870 in its own home, with scaled down versions of the gtx 380.

    I think waiting for the gtx 380 whatever flavor you go, because I can't see the gtx 380 not having an effect on the price of the 5870.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 09-22-2009 at 10:18 PM.

  12. #112
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJohn View Post
    Really liked Guru3D Conclusion
    Talking about transcoding, it surely didn't suck to see how fast the transcoding process was handled by the Radeon HD 5870, leading performance and nothing less.
    Actually I'm a little bit dissapointed with perf in video transcoding. With almost 2 TFLOPs of perf HD5870 should be at least 10 times faster then 3.8GHz Nehalem (120 GFLOPs) not just by 16%.
    But the power consumption is really impressive for such a powerful card.

  13. #113
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I see this launch as an opportunity for NV, the door is left really wide open because the gap is not nearly big enough.

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3643&p=17

    If you ignore resident evil(37%) and Dawn of war II(loses by 4%), the gap between CF 5870 and GTX 285 SLI is between 10-20% ahead for the 5870cf.

    This is all speculations but..

    If the GTX 380 is indeed 510 shaders vs 240 and higher clocks than the gtx 285 and they improve the AA algorithm which has been long overdue for the company and other things coming with the new architechture(since it is said to be new), I can see a GTX 380 possibly being as fast as a CF 5870 or a 5870x2. If this happens(and it is a big if), NV will be able to charge as much as they want for the gtx 380. And similarly a gtx 395 will be untouchable. I know its the halo, and people don't spend the most money there(volume), but its enough to make the 5870 crumble in price which is a good thing. It also gives NV room to attack the 5870 in its own home, with scaled down versions of the gtx 380.

    I think waiting for the gtx 380 whatever flavor you go, because I can't see the gtx 380 not having an effect on the price of the 5870.
    I d be skeptical of any sli vs CF comparisons with immature drivers... I would only take single card results for the moment, as the yare probably more representative of the performance so the margin between a 285 vs 5870... probably accurately reflects the performance diff, versus the CF / SLI comparison at the moment, as scaling will most likely improve substantially from launch numbers.

    To better illustrate...

    Compare the scaling of a 4870 to a 4870x2 .. versus a 5870 to 5870x2... now unless there is some architectural abnormality with 58xx series, the scaling should come close to mirroring what the 4870 achieved, granting there is no bottlenecking to prevent that via pci-e or cpu, etc.

    On top of that, I m sure these clock speeds aren't set in stone, as the process matures, we ll have what equates to 4890's appearing as well i m sure, that and the fact nvidia to the best of our knowledge isn't ready to launch anything for 4months yet... So we ll see, I think this will drop 4870x2's like a rock, and 285's and 295's as well, which will allow me to cheaply trifire a 4870x2 with my 48701gb while i wait and let the smoke settle in q1 2010 ^^ Plus, it remains to be seen if the lynnfield will suffer at high res from the pci-e lanes..at 8x ** that answers that! lol.
    Last edited by villa1n; 09-22-2009 at 10:38 PM.
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

  14. #114
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    2,819
    Awesome, amazing idle power consumption.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  15. #115
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    I like the techpower up review. They compare various pcie x lanes by taping off the conductors. testing 1x 4x 8x and 16x

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...caling/25.html
    ~

  16. #116
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by strange|ife View Post
    I like the techpower up review. They compare various pcie x lanes by taping off the conductors. testing 1x 4x 8x and 16x

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...caling/25.html
    Thanks for drawing attention to this article. Indeed very useful info.

  17. #117
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    No 2gb 6 cards yet

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  18. #118
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    382
    NCIXUS has the XFX5870 for $388
    my mini-fridge
    MoBo: GA-EP45-UD3P | CPU: Q9550 3.6GHZ @ 1.216v | RAM: 4x1GB 900mhz @ 5-5-5-15 | GPU: GTX 460 900G/1800S/4400M | PSU: Corsair 750TX| HDD's: Seagate 320GB + 500GB, Samsung 1TB | Case: antec p180

  19. #119
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    This is all speculations but..

    If the GTX 380 is indeed 510 shaders vs 240 and higher clocks than the gtx 285 and they improve the AA algorithm which has been long overdue for the company and other things coming with the new architechture(since it is said to be new), I can see a GTX 380 possibly being as fast as a CF 5870 or a 5870x2. If this happens(and it is a big if), NV will be able to charge as much as they want for the gtx 380.
    I think you are being wildly optimistic here. For this to happen, Nvidia has to best their current single GPU performance by at least 3X.

    I also don't think the 5870 is really stretching its legs yet with current games. Looking at the various reviews, yea it's easy to be a bit underwhelmed, but I don't think we have seen exactly what a 5870 is really capable of. Kinda reminds me of the first 9700 reviews. Performance was great, but not astounding compared to previous gen stuff in many games.

  20. #120
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by eleeter View Post
    I think you are being wildly optimistic here. For this to happen, Nvidia has to best their current single GPU performance by at least 3X.

    I also don't think the 5870 is really stretching its legs yet with current games. Looking at the various reviews, yea it's easy to be a bit underwhelmed, but I don't think we have seen exactly what a 5870 is really capable of. Kinda reminds me of the first 9700 reviews. Performance was great, but not astounding compared to previous gen stuff in many games.
    ATI Kicked up the AA mode... more than a notch.

    http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,6...eviews/?page=6

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  21. #121
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
    I d be skeptical of any sli vs CF comparisons with immature drivers... I would only take single card results for the moment, as the yare probably more representative of the performance so the margin between a 285 vs 5870... probably accurately reflects the performance diff, versus the CF / SLI comparison at the moment, as scaling will most likely improve substantially from launch numbers.

    Compare the scaling of a 4870 to a 4870x2 .. versus a 5870 to 5870x2... now unless there is some architectural abnormality with 58xx series, the scaling should come close to mirroring what the 4870 achieved, granting there is no bottlenecking to prevent that via pci-e or cpu, etc.

    On top of that, I m sure these clock speeds aren't set in stone, as the process matures, we ll have what equates to 4890's appearing as well i m sure, that and the fact nvidia to the best of our knowledge isn't ready to launch anything for 4months yet... So we ll see, I think this will drop 4870x2's like a rock, and 285's and 295's as well, which will allow me to cheaply trifire a 4870x2 with my 48701gb while i wait and let the smoke settle in q1 2010 ^^ Plus, it remains to be seen if the lynnfield will suffer at high res from the pci-e lanes..at 8x ** that answers that! lol.
    One more thing to look at it for me is the TFLOPs, the GTX 285 has about 1.06tflops of performance vs 2.08flops of performance of the 5850.

    Although it is nearly double the tflops, the 5850 is only 5% faster according to tech powerup. The next GTX 380 is supposed to be 2.5 tflops. If we do indeed get this many tflops from the gtx 380, than forget about it just be competitive with the 5870, its going to start getting competitive with the 5870 x2.

    The specs of the gtx 380 might seem outlandish at this point, but considering the size of the gtx 380, which is guaranteed to be huge and NV won't fool around considering how much marketshare AMD has gained for NV being conservative the last time around, I expect them to make a crazy card this time around.

    Eleeter, I don't think they need to increase their performance by so much 3x overall, more so a little over 100% over a gt200 will do it because I think because of scaling issues in regards to tflops in regards to 5xxx series cards (e.g 1.2 tflops 4870 -> 2.7 tflops 5870 does not yield close to the theoretical amount), the 5870x2 might be only 50-70% faster than a 5870.

    If we want to look this in terms of math, a 5870 is 40% faster than a gtx 285, if the 5870x2 is 50% faster than the 5870, which is typically what we see in the anandtech review, then the 5870x2 offers 2.1 times the performance of the gtx 285(math is 140%*50% = 210%). So if the gtx 380 offers a little over double, it can be competitive with the 5870x2. Based on rumors, considering NV has increase the tflop performance by 2.3 or so and has changed the architecture to something new(and AA is something NV can definitely increase because of how bad the old AA algorithms are on their cards), I can see with high AA and high resolution, NV more than doubling the performance.

    When NV went to 7900gtx -> 8800gtx they doubled the amount of gflops(255gflops->510gflops) plus they made a new architecture and we got 100% + boost in high AA and resolution conditions.

    This time if NV didn't fool around and the rumors are true(the increase of 2.3-2.4 in shader flops and they are changing to a new architecture), I can see a jump like we saw when the 8800gtx happened. If this happens and it is a big if, the 5870x2 will have similar performance to the 380gtx.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 09-22-2009 at 11:59 PM.

  22. #122
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    I am waiting for 2GB customised overclocked and custom cooled versions of the 5870 to appear.
    For now you can purchase a 1GB (IMHO should be 2GB) 5870 in the UK for £298.99 inc VAT that is a little bit cheaper than a GTX 295
    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    117
    waiting 5870 2GB GDRAM5 benchmark.................
    When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
    When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
    When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
    When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)
    by John Fruehe

  24. #124
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    160
    Interested in 5850, any review ? :S:

  25. #125
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    One more thing to look at it for me is the TFLOPs, the GTX 285 has about 1.06tflops of performance vs 2.08flops of performance of the 5850.

    Although it is nearly double the tflops, the 5850 is only 5% faster according to tech powerup. The next GTX 380 is supposed to be 2.5 tflops. If we do indeed get this many tflops from the gtx 380, than forget about it just be competitive with the 5870, its going to start getting competitive with the 5870 x2.

    The specs of the gtx 380 might seem outlandish at this point, but considering the size of the gtx 380, which is guaranteed to be huge and NV won't fool around considering how much marketshare AMD has gained for NV being conservative the last time around, I expect them to make a crazy card this time around.
    Xfire for 5870 in Farcry2 as seen in my post 28% increase vs single card...
    Xfire for 4870 vs 4870x2 91% increase.. near perfect scaling... I think the scaling for the profiles of the 5870 have a long way to go... even if they dont reach as high it will still be a substantial fps increase.

    As for the Tflops, the 5870 is at 2.7? .. And again, look at the drivers, the performance is from launch drivers, that havent harnessed the power yet, and from old games, I think there is more in store with dx11. As well the speculation on the gtx380 is just that, I m sure the numbers will edge out the 5870, but who knows by how much, we could argue either way, and it wont make a difference until some real numbers are released, so for now, we should focus on what we know.. which is the 5870 is a powerful card and given the scaling and performance in games, seems like it has a lot of room to mature with drivers.
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

Page 5 of 22 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •