MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 44 of 44

Thread: AMD Bulldozer 16core @ 3ghz benchmarked (EDIT: confirmed fake!)

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    Shame its a fake. But 28 threads and 16 cores does sound too good to be true.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    228
    The AVX instruction set was the first thing that hit my eyes. CPU-Z can't even recognize AES yet.

    And then the 28 MBytes Level 3 Cache, as Chri$ch pointed out.
    .

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by Vozer View Post
    The AVX instruction set was the first thing that hit my eyes. CPU-Z can't even recognize AES yet.

    And then the 28 MBytes Level 3 Cache, as Chri$ch pointed out.
    Exactly, CPU-Z doesn't have that capability yet .

    The 28MB is probably supposed to be due to the probe filter being enabled. Nice guess though.

    Also, John Fruehe says this is obviously photoshopped. Of course he can't say what's real and what't not, but I think his response would have been a bit different if it was real, like how he responded to Magny Cours getting out.
    Core i7 2600K@4.6Ghz| 16GB G.Skill@2133Mhz 9-11-10-28-38 1.65v| ASUS P8Z77-V PRO | Corsair 750i PSU | ASUS GTX 980 OC | Xonar DSX | Samsung 840 Pro 128GB |A bunch of HDDs and terabytes | Oculus Rift w/ touch | ASUS 24" 144Hz G-sync monitor

    Quote Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
    Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!

  4. #29
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    24 threads at 3.16GHz? Do want You messed up badly with the L1 Data Cache though
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  5. #30
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by LOE View Post
    cmon people, you all know its real
    Only in your wet dreams.

    Come one people use your brain, 1 1/2 year before rumored release time?

    That never was the case, if it would have benn September 2010, it would be far more believable. But not now.

  6. #31
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    franck confirmed its fake... cpuz currently cant detect amd 32nm
    plus some other things, but i wont mention them to HELP people make a better fake soon

    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Only in your wet dreams.

    Come one people use your brain, 1 1/2 year before rumored release time?

    That never was the case, if it would have benn September 2010, it would be far more believable. But not now.
    well originally bulldozer was supposed to be out EARLY 2009...

  7. #32
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    I hate to see it's fake lol.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  8. #33
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by LOE View Post
    I was being sarcastic actually

    I am amazed it was posted in the first place, it's a joke and not even a well made one
    really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like?

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like?
    Who cares!? It definitely needed a check before being posted as news

  10. #35
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    amazing that someone would go to this much trouble to do this lol
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,778
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Who cares!? It definitely needed a check before being posted as news
    Fake shot is not the news you are waiting for, but its news nonetheless if it spreads around the net.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Give it a rest people, its fake lets move on.
    Coming Soon

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Not really surprised, it is coming from semiaccurate afterall.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    Not really surprised, it is coming from semiaccurate afterall.
    No, its from the OCWB forums.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    No, its from the OCWB forums.
    Why did OP link to Semiaccurate forums? i didnt bother clicking so i didnt know the primary souce.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by cpuz View Post
    Hello guys,

    cpuz (even version 1.52.3) does not know any 32 nm AMD processor, so it is impossible that it displays "32 nm".
    Besides, the cache associativities are missing ... and finally, the program would not display "AVX" in the instructions sets (it reads avx feature but does not display it).

    :-(
    Man ... Some people really like faking your application. May be we can make a CRC system of what is display and avoid anymore of those ... I ll call you tomorrow!
    adding a CRC that can be check online out of a screen shot would stop those fake for ever.
    It would save some pain for AMD and us to have to answer all of those crazy emails all the time. (For the screens that are not "certified")

    Francois
    DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.

  17. #42
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    yeah, something like the SPI validator

  18. #43
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    354
    Quote Originally Posted by Drwho? View Post
    Man ... Some people really like faking your application. May be we can make a CRC system of what is display and avoid anymore of those ... I ll call you tomorrow!
    adding a CRC that can be check online out of a screen shot would stop those fake for ever.
    It would save some pain for AMD and us to have to answer all of those crazy emails all the time. (For the screens that are not "certified")

    Francois
    Hello François,
    This is what validation is made for.
    Serious screenshots include the validation ID

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like?
    If your connections would be good enough you can just fly to dresden and do whatever testing needed on Bulldozer

    with enough paper signs off course
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •