Page 43 of 62 FirstFirst ... 334041424344454653 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,075 of 1533

Thread: DFI UT X58-T3EH8 continued - Part 2

  1. #1051
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    My 2nd board (2nd RMA) should be here tomorrow. Actually kinda scared to try it again though, because I gotta leave on the road with it in a week. Might just bring the new Athlon rig instead

  2. #1052
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,224
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    memtest86+ 3.0

    approved..
    finally a good memtest to find mem skew aka bootup bclk
    vtt voltage
    and dram voltage..

    what u get here is the same as prime.
    I used Memtest86+ 3.0 beta 3 and I passed 15 passes of it without any error with my settings, when I get into windows and run LinX max memory I fail with a BSOD and get code 124, which I have found to be VTT/Bclk related.

    Could it be that this code is also vcore related as well?

  3. #1053
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    Damn, got my board back I think it's probably from someone on here from RMA lol!! The back metal pieces are all rusty probably from phase and the bow is bowed like a U. But it works, this one buzzes too though. Guess they just all buzz underload. But man, finally got a SSD and it freakin flys now

  4. #1054
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX View Post
    I used Memtest86+ 3.0 beta 3 and I passed 15 passes of it without any error with my settings, when I get into windows and run LinX max memory I fail with a BSOD and get code 124, which I have found to be VTT/Bclk related.

    Could it be that this code is also vcore related as well?
    think u guys dont know how to use it

    to find the vtt voltage
    u need to run lower mem skews
    u will see the difference

    its the same way we use to test skews for REX.

    remember the board bios has its limit depending on ure ram chipset
    my rams will not do more than 2050 CL7 2-4 hours prime stable.
    2100mhz is a no go

    but it was a different story with my kingston T1's. which did 2150mhz CL8 stable

  5. #1055
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,224
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    think u guys dont know how to use it

    to find the vtt voltage
    u need to run lower mem skews
    u will see the difference

    its the same way we use to test skews for REX.

    remember the board bios has its limit depending on ure ram chipset
    my rams will not do more than 2050 CL7 2-4 hours prime stable.
    2100mhz is a no go

    but it was a different story with my kingston T1's. which did 2150mhz CL8 stable
    Could you elaborate on this? What do you mean you need to run lower mem skews?

  6. #1056
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Peen View Post
    Damn, got my board back I think it's probably from someone on here from RMA lol!! The back metal pieces are all rusty probably from phase and the bow is bowed like a U. But it works, this one buzzes too though. Guess they just all buzz underload. But man, finally got a SSD and it freakin flys now


    Mine's got a rusty socket, but I won't RMA it...
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  7. #1057
    2.4C killer
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,924
    Quote Originally Posted by jcool View Post


    Mine's got a rusty socket, but I won't RMA it...
    That's good lol! I shoulda just asked them to fix my old board cause this one gets about 25c hotter on the PWM temps

  8. #1058
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Try leaving Vdroop control on enable... it droops but it doesn't buzz (as loud)
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  9. #1059
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    After trying 4.3GHZ(205x21) 1.28v and 4.2GHZ(210x20) 1.24v for a while, missed my low-volt summer OC, and had to check it out again.
    Summer is over and it is running so cool at lower ambient that it is really tempting to run @4GHZ (with passive cooling ? ) for 24/7.


    UnCore:QPI 1:1. both at x18, still running strong with VVT=1.21v(BIOS set)
    RAM at x4, @1688 7-8-7-20 1T 1.65v

    @4GHZ(211x19) 1.15v

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  10. #1060
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX View Post
    Could you elaborate on this? What do you mean you need to run lower mem skews?
    well since i am using elpida hypers
    the best bios is 04/28

    the mem skews are based on bootup clocks
    and the vtt is corresponds to it

    example for 2050 CL7 to get RTL 53 on Channel A u need to use bootup bclk 185
    for set bclk 205
    this is tricky as its borderline.
    bootup bclk is between -20 to -5 of set bclk. vtt is corresponding to this
    so what vtt or dram dq vref i should set??
    this takes time and need to do a lot of testing
    but overall its either channel dqvref Channel A + 3.0% with cmd Vref + 120 or -2.5% with cmd vref 110
    this will pass memtest86+ but will have some i/o bsods aka nvidia/raid etc on boot ramdomly. so channel B and C need to be set also. to get optimal rtl of 53/56/58 at vtt 1.44v set.

    for X58 u need to always test on different boots. cold boot, hot boot. resets etc.

    testing of vtt. easy set bootup to 185 for the above with no adjustments and lower vdimm.
    for me i need 1.65v which is proven by prime. so i set 1.635.
    u can see errors in test 2. which correct vtt will reduce it.

    in REx 775 mobo's we tested the same way.undervolting certain voltages to find the others. thats how u test with memtest86+ 3.0. previous memtest versions was not very sensitive. this is especially to mem skews and rtl's of the uncore.

    look at everybody overclocking its so boring all high cpu clocks with slow mem ..
    progress on x58 overclocking would be with higher cpu clock with high mem speeds
    until to date only one person has done 2050 4.3ghz 24hours prime stable on evga classified
    what about 4.4ghz 2100mhz etc..

  11. #1061
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    232
    Why do you want high mem speed over cpu Mhz ? Most test show that increasing cpu Mhz gives way more performance than increasing mem speed.

    Running high mem speed also requires high uncore clocks, wich normally requires high vtt volts, something not everbody feels comfortable with.
    Last edited by Sniper; 09-16-2009 at 05:35 AM.

  12. #1062
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Beneath The Remains, Greece
    Posts
    732
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    look at everybody overclocking its so boring all high cpu clocks with slow mem ..
    progress on x58 overclocking would be with higher cpu clock with high mem speeds
    until to date only one person has done 2050 4.3ghz 24hours prime stable on evga classified
    what about 4.4ghz 2100mhz etc..
    Whats the point of running such high ram clocks on i7 when either 1600c8 or 2200c7 wont make any diffenece in everyday pc use other than benchmarks
    Intel i7 3770K (4.8Ghz@1.36v) ~ Asus Maximus V Gene ~ 8Gb G.Skill Ripjaws X 2133 C9 (@2400 C10) ~ Asus GTX 670 DCUII (1230/7000) ~ Samsung 840 Pro 128Gb ~ WD Black 1Tb ~ Corsair AX 850W ~ X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty ~ Epoz Aktimate Mini ~ Ducky Shine Blue Led /w MX Red ~ Logitech G700 ~ Samsung S27A850D 27" (2440x1600) ~ SilverStone TJ07B-W


    WaterCooled by XSPC Raystorm ~ TC PA 120.3 + 3xAP 15 ~ MCP655 with EK-D5 X-Top Rev.2 ~ EK Multi 250

    Powered by APC Smart-UPS SC 1500 ~ MGE ellipse premium 500


  13. #1063
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by ChaosAD View Post
    Whats the point of running such high ram clocks on i7 when either 1600c8 or 2200c7 wont make any diffenece in everyday pc use other than benchmarks
    right
    then whats the point in spending USD500 on some rams.
    or even bother getting 1600mhz C8.. why not just get 1333mhz C9 sticks since
    dram multi 10 bclk 220 results in cpu speeds of 4.6ghz.
    again ure finding the limitations of a certain hardware.
    and not understanding at all the rest.
    why 2100mhz C7/C8 4.4ghz is a hard thing to do.?? why??
    u have good cooling/ good scaling proc/ good mobo
    whats stopping anyone??
    this is where the term " know thy limitations"

    if the rams can do 2050 C7 1.65v
    it can do 2150-2200mhz C8 1.65v
    so whats stopping it??

    dunno about u but when i overclock i want everything to be overclocked equally.

    hence ram, qpi, uncore and proc.

    overclocking proc on x58 even a retard can do it by just upping voltage with a good proc and good cooling
    the rest is different story. and the ppl who do it will actually feel the difference in each bios.
    most bioses for any mobo the biggest difference is the ram performance and overclocking

  14. #1064
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    High MEM speed is cool for testing&benching, but it is not exactly the sweet spot for 24/7. My sticks can run stable at 2150MHZ CL9 with much better benching numbers, but it needs a good deal more VVT to run stable for 24/7.

    I had a hard time to track the effect of high RAM speed on my daily applications, but it is cool to run on the edge with x5 MEM, just for the heck of it. The only problem is that x5 RAM is far from the sweet spot for total 24/7 OC.

    In my experience and on my setup, the 1.32v VVT needed for stability of x5 MEM puts 3 degrees on CPU and 5 degrees on PWM/temp, both at Idle. This extra heat saved on a 1.2v VVT for x4 MEM can be used for better OC on CPU, for sure. So it is safe to say that running MEM at x5 is not exactly the sweet spot for 24/7, at least on my setup.
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 09-16-2009 at 06:20 AM. Reason: Typos

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  15. #1065
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
    Why do you want high mem speed over cpu Mhz ? Most test show that increasing cpu Mhz gives way more performance than increasing mem speed.

    Running high mem speed also requires high uncore clocks, wich normally requires high vtt volts, something not everbody feels comfortable with.
    most test also shows theres no point in going above 4ghz on a i7..
    so why do u??
    because ure cooling can take it.

    same theory applies if ure rams can do it.. whats stopping it??
    mobo?? bios?? graphic card???
    this is what overclocking is all about..
    understanding limitations.
    what happens when u havent surpass cooling/voltage.. whats stopping u.

    whats the dqvref for?? whats the cmd vref for?? whats the rtl settings has to do with uncore and dram skews and vtt voltages??
    .. it seems alot of ppl dont even try

  16. #1066
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    High MEM speed is cool for testing&benching, but it is not exactly the sweet spot for 24/7. My sticks can run stable at 2150MHZ CL9 with much better benching numbers, but it needs a good deal more VVT to run stable for 24/7.

    I had a hard time to track the effect of high RAM speed on my daily applications, but it is cool to run on the edge with x5 MEM, just for the heck of it. The only problem is that x5 RAM is far from the sweet spot for total 24/7 OC.

    In my experience and on my setup, the 1.32v VVT needed for stability of x5 MEM puts 3 degrees on CPU and 5 degrees on PWM/temp, both at Idle. This extra heat saved on a 1.2v VVT for x4 MEM can be used for better OC on CPU, for sure. So it is safe to say that running MEM at x5 is not exactly the sweet spot for 24/7, at least on my setup.
    post a 2150 C9 4.5ghz. .. u havent even tried stability and gave up because u assumed the vtt was hindering u..

    lol i am runnign 4.3ghz 2.1k CL7 24/7 non stop for 5 months. with more than 100 hours of stressing on my mobo/proc and rams.

    challenge.. post dram 2050 C7/C8/C9 prime 8 hours stable 4.3ghz HT On/OFF..

    hint hint it isnt the vtt thats causing the issue.

    the dfi mobo and evga is a dram overclocking king.
    compare to gaygay and asus.

  17. #1067
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    also another note on some of the xeons and 950
    they have higher multis on cpu

    whats stopping anybody from running 4.4ghz 200bclkx22 with dram at 2k C7..
    have u seen anybody try before??
    y 4.4ghz 1600mhz is the same as 920 4.2ghz dram 1600mhz while the 920 has no issue to run 4.2ghz 2000mhz CL7
    but the 950 does..
    all this is based on idiotic overclocking by increasing voltages only.
    whats stopping it.
    uncore to cpu speeds??
    why high dram speeds above 4.2 is just that hard??
    this is the questions i have been trying to answer with multiple kits and multiple boards and multiple cpu's.
    everything points to qpi related and dqvref so far

  18. #1068
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    232
    Sure, I see your point about pushing the edges, and I'm glad someone does. But for me its all about performance, and if I have to choose between cpu mhz and mem speed (and I do), I choose cpu mhz every time.

    Personally, I dont have a clue dqvref does, and so far I'v managed ok without it. Would I like to know it, sure, but I dont have the time (yet) to learn all about mem tuning.

    I saw someone say that they wished subtimings didnt exists, and thats almost where I'm at too.

  19. #1069
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    one last note also..
    have u guys actually tried stock cpu speeds with dram 1066,1333,1600,1866 and hardest of all 2133mhz?/

    hint hint 2133mhz .. u need to adjust other settings..
    not so direct as to voltage alone.

    betcha not many has tried.

  20. #1070
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
    Sure, I see your point about pushing the edges, and I'm glad someone does. But for me its all about performance, and if I have to choose between cpu mhz and mem speed (and I do), I choose cpu mhz every time.

    Personally, I dont have a clue dqvref does, and so far I'v managed ok without it. Would I like to know it, sure, but I dont have the time (yet) to learn all about mem tuning.

    I saw someone say that they wished subtimings didnt exists, and thats almost where I'm at too.
    no u wouldnt be saying that if u think it more thoroughly
    ure case is true if all dram manufacturers collapsed and there was only one chipset in the market.
    what if down the line u upgraded ure rams by adding another 6gb's but the chipsets were different..
    thats when u would be gratefull on subtimings.

  21. #1071
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniper View Post

    I saw someone say that they wished subtimings didnt exists, and thats almost where I'm at too.
    That would be me

    Seriously I hate ram tuning. Neither do I understand it properly (on x58 at least) nor do I have the time to get into it.
    Just buy two matching 6GB kits with either HCF0 or Hypers and you can run high Mhz pretty hassle-free, that's my approach anyways
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  22. #1072
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    232
    Ram tuning is somewhat the holy grail of oc, and I admire those who have the skills and time to learn it, but the time part excludes me.
    I enjoy tinkering with my cooling, running prime/linx trying too achive my ultimate goal, as high as possible performance with as little nois as possible.
    Last edited by Sniper; 09-16-2009 at 07:19 AM.

  23. #1073
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    Thanks for the input, but I'm on linux atm so HyperPi32M won't work. But I found a proggy called memtester which seems pretty thorough. We'll see what and if it finds something.

  24. #1074
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
    Ram tuning is somewhat the holy grail of oc, and I admire those who have the skills and time to learn it, but the time part excludes me.
    I enjoy tinkering with my cooling, running prime/linx trying too achive my ultimate goal, as high as possible performance with as little nois as possible.
    Same here..
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  25. #1075
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,224
    Oddly enough plugging in the floppy power connector just below the mosfets fixed all of my problems.

    Now stability testing 200x20 1.35v (in bios) 1.3v vtt.

Page 43 of 62 FirstFirst ... 334041424344454653 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •