Less than one week left sirs
not really, 5850 seems to be beat a 285 but not by much... and a 5870 wont be 2x as fast as a 5850, i think we can all agree on that
i think you misread my post, i said:
5850 beats 285 but not by muchupgrading from a 285 to 5850 doesnt make sense i think
upgrading to a 5870 maybe...
but from a 295 to a 5870 again doesnt seem to make sense, on the contrary...
so going from a 285 to a 5850 doesnt really make sense...
upgrading to a 5870 MAYBE makes sense...
upgrading from a 295 to 5870 would actually be a step back... unless your just into benching and want hundreds of fps... where you really need extra gpu perf to get acceptable playable fps, ie demanding games, the 295 seems to be about the same or faster than the 5870.
but like i said, thats probably with amd cpu at stock speed... and as anandtech recently uncovered, some games seem to get a notable perf boost on nvidia gpus when bundled with an amd cpu for some reason... that might actually bite amd in their own pr arse in this document![]()
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
I still wanna know what does it take to fully take advantage of HD5870 CF? A core i7 @4.0Ghz at least?
CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
CPU Cooler: Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
HDD: Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650
Impossible question. It is matter of TASTE actually. In some situations, CPU can be somewhat slowing down, in some situations the GPU. And in some situations the actual "bottleneck" can be the PCI-E bus.
It depends on:
software/game used
settings
the actual scene in the game
drivers
GPU/VRAM speed
CPU/RAM speed
PCI-E bus bandwidth.
So yes, talking about "CPU only" here, it is practically impossible to say accurately. There will always be someone arguing about it. Maybe a 4 GHz i7 can sustain it most of the time without causing major bottleneck, but for sure 7 GHz i9 with 8 cores would do MUCH better still. No one knows, a matter of taste and opinion.
And before someone comes raging that "omg put slow cpu and your fps drops"(sure it does), I suggest "you" to imagine WHY it happens. Hint: Time spent(per frame) by: CPU(both processing and data retrieval from RAM), PCI-E bus data transfer latency, GPU(both processing and data retrieval from VRAM).
Last edited by Calmatory; 09-16-2009 at 02:33 AM.
[[Daily R!G]]
Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW
flickr
Could be, but it depends a lot on resolution. At 1920x1200 (or better, 2560) I doubt CPU is going to be a big bottleneck. And if you are using a lower resolution then you certainly don't need two 5870's. In fact, you don't even need one - a 5850 or even a 4870 is enough at 1680 and below
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
simple answer, yes.
you can check some numbers from people who do overclocking over the top stuff and see how the scaling goes.
Its also a matter of resolution, I would assume, that 1920x1200 is actually a little to low resolution, unelss we go for the 3 screen set ups.
Its a great idea, ati makes a card have a feature, that adds more fps, but what to do with all that power?
Run quake at 1000fps?
No, they spent some time, talking to Samsung, guys we wanna make this feture we call eyefinity, so, if we do that, and you make a special set up, you cut us in for a deal?
Samsung, hum what is it?
ati: Its where our cards are so powerful we needed to add a feature so people would buy more screens to use that power, and guess who they wanna buy from?
Samsung, hum who?
Ati: The guys making screens with thin bezels...
Samsung, you think so?
Ati: come and sit down and play this game here.
Samsung representative: OMG!
Ati: yes we know.![]()
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15535/1/Nvidia confident that GT300 wins over 5870
A few people confirm
Nvidia is still not giving and hard details about its chip that we still call GT300 but one thing is getting quite certain. A few people who saw just leaked performance date of ATI's soon to launch Radeon HD 5870 have told Fudzilla that they are absolutely confident that GT300 will win over Radeon HD 5870.
Since GT300 has its GX2 brother they should not fear much against Radeon 5870 X2 whenever that comes out, as if Nvidia wins a single chip battle, they can win the dual one as well.
We can only confirm that GT300 is not a GT200 in 40nm with DirectX 11 support. It’s a brand new chip that was designed almost entirely from the ground up. Industry sources believe that this is the biggest change since G80 was launched and that you can expect such level of innovation and change.
The launch as far as we know is still slated for late November and hasn’t been confirmed.
LOOOL
Hitler, as Nvidia's CEO, gets informed about ATI's Evergreen series
-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR45ja_fNzU
![]()
Fractal Arc Midi
Asus P8Z77V-PRO
Intel Core I7 3770K
Corsair Hydro H80
8GB G.Skill Ripjaw-X 2133Mhz
eVGA GTX670 SC 2GB
Corsair AX-850W Gold
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
I do agree. The HD5870 will only be 15-20% faster. But that is where is HD5870 X2 comes in to play. Depending on the time nVidia needs for its GT300 GX2 (if there will be a GX2) Its also possible that AMD will have a refresh of the RV870 (HD5890 / HD59xx ish)
At the start i think it will be HD5870 and the X2 VS the GT300 Single card range.
System Specs: -=Game PC=- | -=Lan Box=-
Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD
Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
![]()
INTEL 2600K @ 4.5ghz 24/7 Corsair H100
ASUS P8Z68-V PRO
2 x CORSAIR 4GB DDR3 1600 (CL8)
4TB Seagate SATA2
SAPPHIRE 7950 (GPU 1100 | MEM 1500)
Cosmos S
Asus XONAR DX
Corsair 850W PSU
Plese close that site
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15535/1/
They need to price 5870 at $299 to sell lots of cards.
Bookmarks