Page 15 of 19 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 375 of 454

Thread: Radeon HD 5870 Six with 6 display outputs, prices, performance

  1. #351
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    You're wrong, it is a single die but its structure is the same as a "dual core" cpu.
    And naturally, you have a link to back that up.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  2. #352
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    And naturally, you have a link to back that up.
    What do you want a link to, fudo, charlie, the inq, nordic, b3d, chiphell? Just know that it's a dualcore.
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=5870+%22dual+core%22
    CHIP has the original "Dual" Processor Unit, each PU contains 160 VLIW (vulgar understanding of the words Where there are two RV770 form a RV870), but certainly not in now with a simple package prices
    Where CrossFireX decker SLI are AFR (cross-frame rendering), image processing, 2 GPU Where】 【rotation exchange working, efficiency relates to the driver to complete a few quick, the error can not compensate for delay
    RV870 with generous SFR (split-frame rendering), image processing, professionals, all know that playing a three-color RGB images must be completed, SFR Where Through 1FPS on screen divided into a number of 8 * 8-32 * 32Pixel generous detailed map between the to carry out the same color with the nuclear deal as long as the Bandwidth咁sample is large enough, you can achieve the same RV770 generous GPUClock case is equal to +200% efficiency.
    (SFR consumption on the heaviest Where Bandwidth, RV870XT will spend the world's fastest generous GDDR5)
    The above messages are from the Mainland China's internal sources AMD
    http://bbs.chiphell.com/viewthread.p...age%3D1&page=5
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=174

    Originally Posted by kllrnohj
    Praytell why the hell would ATI make a "native dual core"? That doesn't even make sense with GPUs. If they are going to CF two GPUs on one die, they would be better off just making it one GPU. It'd be faster with less overhead and wouldn't cost any more to manufacturer.
    Basically instead of making a mega cores with 1600 SP you make two 800 SP cores on the same die with fast inter connects to support SFR. This way you can concentrate on refining process tech for the lower trans count 800 SP cores. It will not be as fast as a native 1600 SP chip but it will be easier to produce. And it appears that the cores share a single memory controller. So I guess instead of calling it dual core it may be better to call it dual shader mega clusters.
    http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.ph...5&postcount=37

    Either way a source has hinted that the new card R870 will be two GPU dies glued together sharing a memory bus. This is pretty much the exact same that was said before the R700 launch, and while we can't confirm this, similar information has been posted over at Chiphell.

    Both are basically saying that AMD has glued two RV870 GPUs together
    well they glued two rv770's together to make the rv870. later nordic goes on to talk about "quad-fire on a stick"... this is where you get to see 4 rv770's in the R800 (but only two die).

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...43&postcount=1

    Hope this helps.
    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-11-2009 at 01:08 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #353
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    AMD's next-gen GPU powers Crysis on an iPhone : Ars technica

    AMD unveiled its next-gen GPU, and secretive networked gaming company OTOY used it to power a demo of Crysis running on an iPhone. Believe it or not, it really worked ...

  4. #354
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Pamplona, SPAIN
    Posts
    1,182
    ^^ Impressive tech too, and you don't need to stream 1080p games over the net, you can make the server renderer use a much lower resolution, as the one in your phone.
    i7 2600k @4500 | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 | Gskill 2x4096Mb 2133Mhz | 4x2TB WD Green RAID10 | OCZ Vertex3 120Gb | 2x AMD 6950 @ Stock
    Benq 24" TN | Samsung LE46C630 "2nd" Monitor | Enermax NAXN ENP850EWT | Corsair 800D Case | Corsair H60 | Logitech G9x + Wireless Solar K750

  5. #355
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Top of the card looks cool "RADEON" stamped in red... 5870 Six model


    I think 5870 "Six" is the "Trillian" codenamed part

    Last edited by jaredpace; 09-11-2009 at 01:55 AM.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #356
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    What do you want a link to, fudo, charlie, the inq, nordic, b3d, chiphell? Just know that it's a dualcore.
    I don't think so and I bet a cookie it's "just" the way GPUs have been for ages now.
    "Dualcore" GPU just doesn't make ANY sense.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  7. #357
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    I'm sorry but that's not how it works. Plug the intake of a turbo, does it start pulling air in from the outlet? No, it simply hits the choke point. It's the same for this type of fan - they operate on the same physical principle. They could be intakes if they are ducted to the inlet side of the fan, but just having two holes there would make them outlets.
    Well my arugment was not whether or not they defyed the laws of this type of fans physics, just that when the top opening was blocked that through some manner or ducting they would act as a draw in point for fresh air, im not dissmissing the fact that the centrifugal blower only can draw air from the top, just that when it was blocked some manner would allow it to draw from those ports

    The intake vent on the back end serves as the main source of intake air when the card is in an SLI configuration. When run in a multi GPU setup, these cards are incredibly close to each other, so another avenue for air intake had to be used.


    You can see here that the fan is shrouded to prevent it from throwing the air in all directions and out of the intake, i assume the 5870 is the same, you can see the gap between the blower and chassis which is probley the draw point where the lip is cut out to allow intake... soo if you put ur finger in the intake and felt upwards there would be a small gap to feed air from the intake of the blower.. if not the fan shroud and the top chassis are two seperate pieces that dont even touch.. i assume they are air "intake" and not exhaust



    You can see here the same principle, the shroud for the radial fan hides the fan, but i bet there is just enough room to force those inlets to draw if the top becomes blocked
    Last edited by crystogod; 09-11-2009 at 02:23 AM.

  8. #358
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  9. #359
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    snip
    Time will tell. Once we get the reviews, we can see the die-shot.

    If we consider that theory of yours to be true nonetheless, would this make xfire's perfect scaling possible?

    Hmm... I wonder what's that big white rectangle on the card is. Capacitor?

  10. #360
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Top of the card looks cool "RADEON" stamped in red... 5870 Six model


    I think 5870 "Six" is the "Trillian" codenamed part

    Are the crossfire fingers on this card not connected yet? I can see the tabs but it looks like there are no tracers/gold fingers tracks yet run..

  11. #361
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601

  12. #362
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    I don't think so and I bet a cookie it's "just" the way GPUs have been for ages now.
    "Dualcore" GPU just doesn't make ANY sense.
    Deal. I bet it isn't.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #363
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Stupid cellphone cameras! The pics are nearly useless...

    There's 4 (option for 5) vGPU phases using what it seems Volterra VT1195SFs, +1 other Volterra VRM for an unknown load, likely uncore like on HD4890, and finally 1+1 with unknown parts for memory. Looks like a very powerful VRM.
    Last edited by largon; 09-11-2009 at 02:40 AM.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  14. #364
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Sweet! thank you



    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  15. #365
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    add we can see 6 x 2 PEG

  16. #366
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    You can see here that the fan is shrouded to prevent it from throwing the air in all directions and out of the intake, i assume the 5870 is the same, you can see the gap between the blower and chassis which is probley the draw point where the lip is cut out to allow intake... soo if you put ur finger in the intake and felt upwards there would be a small gap to feed air from the intake of the blower.. if not the fan shroud and the top chassis are two seperate pieces that dont even touch.. i assume they are air "intake" and not exhaust



    You can see here the same principle, the shroud for the radial fan hides the fan, but i bet there is just enough room to force those inlets to draw if the top becomes blocked
    The fan is clearly shrouded near the power connectors to avoid sending airflow that way. But without a disassembled view of the heatsink, it's hard to say if the rest of the fan on that side is shrouded. If it is completely shrouded on that side and there is a gap between the top of the bezel and the shroud on that side then the fan could conceivably draw some fresh air from those holes. But the airflow would be restricted to the size of the gap, which is certainly much smaller then the holes.

  17. #367
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    The fan is clearly shrouded near the power connectors to avoid sending airflow that way. But without a disassembled view of the heatsink, it's hard to say if the rest of the fan on that side is shrouded. If it is completely shrouded on that side and there is a gap between the top of the bezel and the shroud on that side then the fan could conceivably draw some fresh air from those holes. But the airflow would be restricted to the size of the gap, which is certainly much smaller then the holes.
    Well, i think the principle is any air, is good air. I just blocked my gtx280 fan and it seems to draw air in from the rear

  18. #368
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    add we can see 6 x 2 PEG
    So 6 + 8 peg is obviously for 5870 "Six" 2gb pictured earlier in the thread (and supposedly for R800 as well)
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  19. #369
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,663
    If a single 5870 can play a modern game at full 7680x3200 resolution (across six displays), does this mean we will not have any performance loss on a single monitor going from 1440x900 to 1600x1200? I mean, if these things barely choke on six displays, we shouldn't see anything happen on a single monitor regardless of the resolution. This will revolutionize gaming, and GPU reviewing. Truly, this is an amazing feat.

    I want a 5870 NOW!
    Core i7 2600K@4.6Ghz| 16GB G.Skill@2133Mhz 9-11-10-28-38 1.65v| ASUS P8Z77-V PRO | Corsair 750i PSU | ASUS GTX 980 OC | Xonar DSX | Samsung 840 Pro 128GB |A bunch of HDDs and terabytes | Oculus Rift w/ touch | ASUS 24" 144Hz G-sync monitor

    Quote Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
    Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!

  20. #370
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
    If a single 5870 can play a modern game at full 7680x3200 resolution (across six displays), does this mean we will not have any performance loss on a single monitor going from 1440x900 to 1600x1200? I mean, if these things barely choke on six displays, we shouldn't see anything happen on a single monitor regardless of the resolution. This will revolutionize gaming, and GPU reviewing. Truly, this is an amazing feat.

    I want a 5870 NOW!
    Welll, hold on there.. Those photos were not very detailed, and we dont know if....

    a) AA/AF was on
    b) The type of system running the cards
    c) Any of game tweaks etc
    d) If they looked utterly crap
    e) How responsive was the game, was it fluid and sexy or laggy and jittery

    Im holding judgement until i see some metric proof

  21. #371
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    very interesting - hopefully the 5870 2gb is available on launch date! what ever that date may be

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  22. #372
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    Welll, hold on there.. Those photos were not very detailed, and we dont know if....

    a) AA/AF was on
    b) The type of system running the cards
    c) Any of game tweaks etc
    d) If they looked utterly crap
    e) How responsive was the game, was it fluid and sexy or laggy and jittery

    Im holding judgement until i see some metric proof
    READ:
    http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/17563

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635

    http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/09/...7k-resolution/

    ....and maybe 10 or 20 others reported this. These GPUs played these games at these high resolutions and with settings turned up. Not an easy thing to accomplish. I think we're really seeing something amazing here. Maybe it hasn't fully sunken in yet, but AMD really did this!
    Core i7 2600K@4.6Ghz| 16GB G.Skill@2133Mhz 9-11-10-28-38 1.65v| ASUS P8Z77-V PRO | Corsair 750i PSU | ASUS GTX 980 OC | Xonar DSX | Samsung 840 Pro 128GB |A bunch of HDDs and terabytes | Oculus Rift w/ touch | ASUS 24" 144Hz G-sync monitor

    Quote Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
    Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!

  23. #373
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
    READ:
    http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/17563

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635

    http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/09/...7k-resolution/

    ....and maybe 10 or 20 others reported this. These GPUs played these games at these high resolutions and with settings turned up. Not an easy thing to accomplish. I think we're really seeing something amazing here. Maybe it hasn't fully sunken in yet, but AMD really did this!
    Okay, your point was made in the very first article... but i still dont understand how ATI could have a trick this BIG up their sleeve. To have that much power in a single card... to be able to drive so many high quality screens at such high quality

  24. #374
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,663
    Quote Originally Posted by crystogod View Post
    Okay, your point was made in the very first article... but i still dont understand how ATI could have a trick this BIG up their sleeve. To have that much power in a single card... to be able to drive so many high quality screens at such high quality
    The specs of these cards exceed 2x the specs of my 4870 (ROPs and TMUs especially). Their ability to do AA and AF has much more than just doubled. Sure, these GPUs cant' do PhysX, but they seem to be capable of doing everything a gamer wants out of them. I can't wait to try a F@H client on a 1600 stream processor GPU too.
    Core i7 2600K@4.6Ghz| 16GB G.Skill@2133Mhz 9-11-10-28-38 1.65v| ASUS P8Z77-V PRO | Corsair 750i PSU | ASUS GTX 980 OC | Xonar DSX | Samsung 840 Pro 128GB |A bunch of HDDs and terabytes | Oculus Rift w/ touch | ASUS 24" 144Hz G-sync monitor

    Quote Originally Posted by phelan1777 View Post
    Hail fellow warrior albeit a surat Mercenary. I Hail to you from the Clans, Ghost Bear that is (Yes freebirth we still do and shall always view mercenaries with great disdain!) I have long been an honorable warrior of the mighty Warden Clan Ghost Bear the honorable Bekker surname. I salute your tenacity to show your freebirth sibkin their ignorance!

  25. #375
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
    READ:
    http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/17563

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635

    http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/09/...7k-resolution/

    ....and maybe 10 or 20 others reported this. These GPUs played these games at these high resolutions and with settings turned up. Not an easy thing to accomplish. I think we're really seeing something amazing here. Maybe it hasn't fully sunken in yet, but AMD really did this!
    This is jaw dropping impressive. Kudos to AMD.

Page 15 of 19 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •