I hope I'm wrong but typically when there is such a small amount of info around pre-launch it's because there isn't much exciting data around to leak.
I hope I'm wrong but typically when there is such a small amount of info around pre-launch it's because there isn't much exciting data around to leak.
Talk about 1600 shaders isn't exciting? Yeah, they keep everythinng closed, Nvidia can almost rest that theur GT300 will be significantly faster. And BOOM; 2000 shaders @ 995 MHz with $299 price tag, full availability from day one.
Now I sit back and wait for the first "omg lolz no" postings from people with no sense of humour. (1600/773MHz for me as a real guess.).
I agree, might turn up that way. And of course them stating the date for the hard launch.
Who knows, the hard launch might just be 2 weeks after the 10th.
More like it, but not this time it seems.
I bet we won't end up saying "There's nothing special about it." this time, I mean its DX11 and all that(hype?). LOL.
[[Daily R!G]]
Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW
flickr
Who needs Viagra when ati is not letting any information slip between their lips about specs?
![]()
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
or refuses to beleive anything ATI rumour related, no matter how realistic but when a rumour of nvidia having a card that has 4ghz gpu, 12ghz shader and 10000000ghz ddr188 ram and pulling 0.0001w at full load they beleive it instantly with the line "zomg this will send ati to the grave" etc etc
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
Realistically, I think you've got this backward. There is a lot of room for people who strongly prefer ATI hardware without diving into descriptions of delusional fanaticism. The truth is, ATI hardware is generally in the same ballpark. It would have to smash nVidia performance by an absolutely insane margin before many people would consider it on an equal footing. We see the same thing happen between the parties debating the merits of AMD and Intel processors.
When it comes to changing established perceptions, equality just isn't enough.
Some people don't seem bothered by this problem and recognize ATI for what it is. It's a competitive hardware house who during this last generation provided a much better bargain. I see no evil in that.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
Auzen X-FI Prelude
Seasonic X-650 PSU
Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
Samsung F3 1TB
Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
Corsair 800D
3008WFP A00
there are many large differences between ati and nvidia, first and formost being their style of building gpus!
there are advantages and disadvantages for owning a card from each brand, it all depends on what you use your rig for and what games you play. these arguements stating "zomg ati pwns nv again!!11!!1!!11!" or visa versa are silly, it's up to each one of us to look at the data and decide where to spend our hard-earned greenbacks. we don't know the specs for either camp, we don't know the performance, we don't know the cost. i'm down for some tin-foil-hat speculation, but these statements about there being ONE AND ONLY ONE good gfx company are useless.
My sentiments exactly, I just do not see what brings on the hate for one brand or another. I will always buy what is best for my needs and interest, I only like sngle gpu more for simplicities sake. (simple for us even if not for Nvidia to make it)
Thanks for proving my argument, atleast indirectly.Also from 2002-2005 I only bought ATI card for my main rig. Also guess what card I owned most of 2006, an X1900XT!
The problem was that card was a real late comer and the X1800XT was not what was needed to dethrone or even shake the ages old grip the 7800GTX had at that point. Allot of people considered a pair of 7900s better, glad for Oblivions sake I didnt. I just disdane how ATI has NOT unarguably wrangled back the crown since the R580 days, a card that itself was a pale victory next to the 9700pro. The only thing that really gets me excited for the HD5870 is value, not to awe in its performance.
Bookmarks