charlie had the codenames wrong? just hemlock afaik and thats probably cause he listened to sylvie
jared, why would the 5870 be that much faster than the 5850? those numbers look weird, i cant figure out what he based his perf boost over 4890 on..
what shader count did he expect when he made that graph? it doesnt make any sense that with about double the hw he only predicts a 10% boost in some games?
and about 5870 beating gtx295...
4870 to 4870x2 scaling is 55% of a 295 to 90% of a 295... considering that a 5870 appears to have the same hw specs as a 4870x2 but isnt castrated by having it on 2 chips and there is no overhead, id expect a 5870 to be around 110% of a 295 like a 4870x2 would be, if it wouldnt have any overhead caused by being based on 2 chips... and thats assuming the 5870 comes clocked at 750mhz core and 3600mhz mem... according to the rumored specs it looks like like 800-900 clocks for the gpu and 5000mhz for the mem... so it will DEFINATELY beat the 295...
Bookmarks