MMM
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 203

Thread: AMD 4Gz Air Cooling Club

  1. #101
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    [QUOTE=WSP;3970250]maybe that's why Crosshair III is not too popular?
    is that issues only arrives under sub-zero condition?

    I'm planning to built another rig with X4 955/965, but currently I'm confusing with the choise: Should I get GA-MA790FXT-UD5P, MSI 790FX-GD70 or Crosshair III

    chew, it that Dominator GT on your vantage?

    QUOTE]

    No, dying crucial d9 gts.

    As far as the boards, well some of the issues are apparent on air as well.....ln2 just amplifies certain issues.

    I have used them, they rock out on air especially with 2x2g if you get a good board, 1x1 gig isn't there strength as far as Ocing ram goes.

    The giga is just rock solid, not the greatest performer but works no matter hot cold etc etc.

    MSI is a good air water board, the better choice IMO for multicard apps.

    And asus is a damn good board as well, better for dual gpu.cfgs and air/water benching, phase to.
    Last edited by chew*; 08-20-2009 at 11:58 AM.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  2. #102
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    today first time im lucky and broked 3000 MHz at northbridge , tomorow maybe my new 1M record

    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  3. #103
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    FlanK3r, is it bench stable yet? let's say Superpi 32M or cinebench? I think those 2 benchmark would definitely gain from NB speed, right?

    today I'm testing new bios for MSI 770-C45 (bios 1.4B2), and it's working good. got me stable on cinebench @Win7 x64

    here it is:


  4. #104
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    for superpi maybe, dont know, so much high NB i never tested before (i tried today 4050MHz + 2800 MHz at NB), for CInebench 100% not. Cinebench is killer for CPU and NB
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  5. #105
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    101
    A little update




  6. #106
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    for superpi maybe, dont know, so much high NB i never tested before (i tried today 4050MHz + 2800 MHz at NB), for CInebench 100% not. Cinebench is killer for CPU and NB
    yeah...I coulnt run cinebench @>2600mhz NB freq

  7. #107
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    26
    Ok my Friends from ID, permisi ... i'm join this club






    Thanks
    adios

  8. #108
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Phenom 2 x4 965
    Asus M3A79-T D
    G-Skill 2x2gb 1066 ddr2
    Xigmatec

    cinebench 32bit



    cinebench 64bit



    superpi 32M



    3dm06 cpu score 5906



    1 hour 4ghz primeblend

    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  9. #109
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    161
    I got this last night (cooling: Thermalright IFX-14 + 3X Scythe Ultra Kaze 3000):

    I can't get it to run any sort of benchmarks at that speed, though - just barely stable enough to get a validation. I might try for 4.3 GHz later.

  10. #110
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    yeah i can help you, buy another mobo and next time dont be a smart ass and try and run prime and OCCT for 8 hrs straight

    but no matter what i say, i bet you get at least one in this thread alone who will try and put in a reply like the one above,

    ill be watching
    From my perspective, if your MOSFETs can blow at the settings you're using by running software, you aren't stable. People need to cool their voltage regulators and not even try for 1.55V to begin with if they're not on an appropriate board. Ultimately, in such a scenario, OCCT did manage to do its job!

    I personally won't consider something stable until it has 24+ hours Prime and a week or two of general usage on it, crash-free.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  11. #111
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    From my perspective, if your MOSFETs can blow at the settings you're using by running software, you aren't stable. People need to cool their voltage regulators and not even try for 1.55V to begin with if they're not on an appropriate board. Ultimately, in such a scenario, OCCT did manage to do its job!

    I personally won't consider something stable until it has 24+ hours Prime and a week or two of general usage on it, crash-free.
    mi rig smoetimes crashed when doing something-not-too-ver-heavy-task like opening Opera browser or browsing windows explorer or crunching, but I'm not bothered with it at all, as long as it can play my favorite games crash-free

  12. #112
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Ad1os, you welcome m8, nice results

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunait View Post
    I got this last night (cooling: Thermalright IFX-14 + 3X Scythe Ultra Kaze 3000):

    I can't get it to run any sort of benchmarks at that speed, though - just barely stable enough to get a validation. I might try for 4.3 GHz later.
    did it bench-stable at speed lower than that? say...4.1ghz?
    might produce interesting results though

    ---===[ List Updated on p.1 ]===----

  13. #113
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by WSP View Post
    Ad1os, you welcome m8, nice results



    did it bench-stable at speed lower than that? say...4.1ghz?
    might produce interesting results though

    ---===[ List Updated on p.1 ]===----
    The highest stable prime95 and IBT frequency I can get is 3940 MHz. I managed to run SuperPi 1M at 4182 MHz, though, and got 16.516 seconds: Screenshot
    Last edited by Lunait; 08-31-2009 at 03:25 PM.

  14. #114
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Lunait, @4.1ghz, I believe your cpu can do most of the benchmark m8

  15. #115
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    my is not bad too, think, but i have fear with higher voltage in benches, i use 1.475 or 1.48V

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=646964

    with 1.48V...
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  16. #116
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by WSP View Post
    Lunait, @4.1ghz, I believe your cpu can do most of the benchmark m8
    I seem to run into some sort of wall at around 4.0 GHz. I don't think heat is the problem, since my temps are reasonable (32°C idle and 50°C load).

  17. #117
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    223
    my attempt on vista ultimate (32-bit)


    | AMD Ryzen 5 76000 w/ EVGA CLC 360 | ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI | FF4D532G5600HC32DC01 | Radeon™ RX 6950 XT GAMING OC 16G | XB323QK |
    | 512GB NM760 + Crucial P3 2TB + ST2000LM015 + ST2000LX001 |
    | Creative Stage V2/HE400SE | Xonar U7 MKII | Focus GX-850 | D31 Mesh Screen Black | MK-730-GKCL1 + MM711 + MP510 |


  18. #118
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Lunait---->have you try with OCing with base clock, and not just the multiplier?It may help you around those wall though...just my 2 cents

    ah khoo--->nice m8
    might be doing more great with those RAMs clocked higher and tighter timings, and higher NB freq too

    and, why is that your GFX running at x8 bandwidht instead of x16?

  19. #119
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    my is not bad too, think, but i have fear with higher voltage in benches, i use 1.475 or 1.48V

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=646964

    with 1.48V...
    I believe if it is for benching, 1.575v in considered safe on air cooling, provided the cooler can manage the temps under 55°C load

    I'm benching mostly @1.525-1.575v on air with my PII X2 550

    but for 24/7, I'm limiting voltage to 1.4v (currently running 3.8g@1.4v. although 1.375v is enough for that speed, but sometimes getr UNSTABLE_MACHINE error while crunching)

  20. #120
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by WSP View Post
    Lunait---->have you try with OCing with base clock, and not just the multiplier?It may help you around those wall though...just my 2 cents
    Yeah, I've raised the base clock from 200 to 202 MHz with a multiplier of x19.5 to get 3.94 GHz. But as soon as I raise it to 203, it becomes unstable.

  21. #121
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    mmmm......strange, seems like you've got a wall @>202mhz base clock

    what mobo and bios version you got? have you try another bios? not only upgrade, sometimes a downgrade bios OC better

  22. #122
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    And what my PSU? I have seasonic 500W (with 1.55V its ok for benchmarks? Others component are in my signature)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    me using Corsair VX450w (seasonic built), and it's been doing great since I got it.33A on single rail +12v.
    even I run Intel's E4300 on air+ice on it. with 1.7v vcore (running 3.9ghz), and CF-X HD 3870+HD3850.
    CF-X HD4850+HD4830 also not a problems
    Never dissapointed with this psu. so, I believe your PSU is good.

    but if doing sub-zero (I'm planning to do that someday), I'm gonna use a different PSU with >600w single rail +12v. cant afford 750w PSUs though

  24. #124
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lund, Sweden
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by WSP View Post
    mmmm......strange, seems like you've got a wall @>202mhz base clock

    what mobo and bios version you got? have you try another bios? not only upgrade, sometimes a downgrade bios OC better
    I have a Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P board, with the F5 BIOS. Is there a better BIOS for this board?

    Memory is Corsair 1600MHz Dominator CL9, and my PSU is a Corsair TX 750W.
    Last edited by Lunait; 09-02-2009 at 11:41 AM.

  25. #125
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    144
    Chew is running the same mobo with F3L bios

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •