Results 1 to 25 of 3593

Thread: Retail Q9650 Overclocking Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,035
    Max and min anything is the 'functional range'. Max and min temp = functional temp range. Max and min time = functional time range. They don't directly say "functional operating limits = 0.85v - 1.3625v" but they don't have to.

    They describe two voltage ranges, and relate one to the other, and they refer to one in two different ways. They do not mention any voltage between 1.3625v and 1.45v. That doesn't leave any room for interpretation.
    Ci7 990X::Rampage III Extreme::12GB Corsair Dominator 1866C7GT::2 x EVGA SC Titans in SLI::Corsair AX1200::TJ07::Watercooled
    Ci7 920 3849B018::Rampage II Extreme::6GB GSKILL Trident 2000C9 BBSE::EVGA GTX580::Antec Signature SG850::TJ09::Aircooled w/TRUE 120X

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by CryptiK View Post
    Max and min anything is the 'functional range'. Max and min temp = functional temp range. Max and min time = functional time range. They don't directly say "functional operating limits = 0.85v - 1.3625v" but they don't have to.

    They describe two voltage ranges, and relate one to the other, and they refer to one in two different ways. They do not mention any voltage between 1.3625v and 1.45v. That doesn't leave any room for interpretation.
    The question is where in Intel's datasheet and by what reasons do you stand by your statements?

    Hey, if you have a strong personal will to interpret Intel's datasheet in your own words, it's perfectly ok as you're always entitled to your own opinion. But don't say that's what Intel means to say in the public without solid proof, please. Rumors always come up this way.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •