MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 94

Thread: HOW TO REMOVE i7 IHS

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by rge View Post
    +1...which is why passive direct die cooling wont work on i7, I drew a pic back when arguing with someone else ...there is no getting around the very small surface area of die, and .58 W/M*k heat conductance of water is not going to dissipate 180W. I could see IHS/waterblock combo without thermal paste, ie soldered as doing better, but not direct die.

    i think you can't argument with the heat conductance of water / copper...
    You have to mind that the water comes with high speed and only stays for a very short time directly on that cpu. So take a stick of copper and heat one side of it... Don't you think the waterflow will be faster than the heat conducting through the metal?

    The fakt is, that direct die watercooling offers continuously new cold material (water) to dispate the heat. Copper heats on and on, there is no new material coming... heat have to to through the material.

    I think direct die cooling only works if the water comes with a quite fast an continuous stream over the die.

    Example:

    Try to brun a hole in a plastic bottle filled with water. Think you can't...
    Try to burn a hole in a bottle filled with copper - or a brick of copper packed in plastic... i think you will know what i'm talking about...
    Intel 990X ES @ 6x4,60Ghz@1,440V klick / DFI UT x58@ MIPS HD6950@70@1Ghz / 256GB M4 SSD / X-Fi / HK3.0 - Laing Ultra - Thermochill PA120.3 + TFC 120er + Cape Cora Ultra 8x/ Aquaero Steuerung / Lian Li A7110B / Seasonic Platinum 1kw / 2xDell IPS 23" / Win 7 + Server 2008 R2/ DSL 16K
    HTPC + HTPC Wiki + sysProfile + Clarkdale @<15W + Eigenbau-Ambilight + Ambilight PreOrder

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    148
    Don't forget, while Copper provides "666x" faster heat transfer then just the water, the performance will be judged by the poorest component not the best, in this case by either the core ->TIM-> IHS application, or the IHS->TIM-> waterblock.

    This simplifies the process from "core->TIM-> IHS-> TIM->copper block -> water" down to just "core->water". Though all our theorizing doesn't take away from the fact that the OP is getting crazy good temperatures that none us water or air cooled guys could dream of.
    Core I7 920 4.2 ghz (21x200) 1.35 volts / Asus P6T / Corsair XMS 1333mhz @ 1600mhz / EVGA GTX 285 SSC (724 core/1634 shaders / 1508 mem) / Modified ThermalTake Armor

    Swiftech Apogee, MCW-60, Swiftech 655, Black Ice GTX 360

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •