He already swapped the CPUs around.. see #145
Gawd how great it would be if ppl would actually READ a thread before posting.. not directed at you Sgt. McRuff, just a trend I noticed on here that's getting more and more evident every day.
He already swapped the CPUs around.. see #145
Gawd how great it would be if ppl would actually READ a thread before posting.. not directed at you Sgt. McRuff, just a trend I noticed on here that's getting more and more evident every day.
Sorry dude, I must of misread it, dyslexia is a *****.
Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit
Nothing to worry about, like I said I did not mean to attack anyone, just an observation I've made recently. And most people REALLY don't read properly, unlike you (sorry bud...)
I've got six 1GB ECC reg DDR2 DIMMs coming tomorrow from some family in KC. I should be able to confirm or eliminate memory configuration as a possible cause at that time. In the mean time, I need to figure out a way to jack the HT link up so I can overclock things. There are zero settings for the speed of anything but RAM. nTune also just crashes on load--before it even does anything.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
SetFSB? Can you tell us which PLL?
It's integrated into the MCP55 southbridge I believe. I don't have the experience to try and pick out a chip on the mobo, either. Don't know what I'd be looking for. If you have some pointers, I'd be willing to try.
Last edited by Particle; 07-05-2009 at 12:35 PM.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Will be a small to medium-sized black chip, should have 3 lines of writing on it.Originally Posted by Particle
It's integrated into the MCP55 southbridge I believe. I don't have the experience to try and pick out a chip on the mobo, either. Don't know what I'd be looking for. If you have some pointers, I'd be willing to try.
First should say something like ICS932S421BGLF (that's my Tyan S7002's PLL) generally something starting with ICSxxxxxxxx.
Check here for a complete list of supported PLLs. The chip should be located near the PCIe/PCI slot area.
Particle do you know how to tweak with R/W everything tool ??
u can overclock mcp55 with that tool and tweak ram timings thru registers
Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted
asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
vga= 8800gt
winxp pro
custom chiller -31 water
2x dtek fuzions
bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
antec 850 quattro
heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax
I'll start looking immediately.
No, I wouldn't know what to do with it to get the desired effect. Is there a guide and a download link?
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I use to have problems with systool on my Tyan 5000i board.
It would crash the system everytime when starting the application.
as a workaround I did :
go start / run
type "SysTool.exe" -fsb ICS932S421:360
(360 is the target FSB )
I don't think that applies to me as a fix yet--at least not until we can identify the PLL. I likely don't have the ICS932S421. I can't find any black chip anywhere on the board starting with ICS*. Could it be under a heatsink?
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
particle i can send u a guide send me your email in pm
Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted
asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
vga= 8800gt
winxp pro
custom chiller -31 water
2x dtek fuzions
bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
antec 850 quattro
heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax
Could also be starting with CV or CY or RTM or SLG or W (see setFSB list)
Usually PLL chips aren't under any heatsinks. Got a high res pic of that mobo maybe?
Glad to hear the board isn't dead, hopefully you can figure out what's up with the memory issue.
Get a high resolution pictures and we can find the PLL for you
I'll get some high-res shots of the board as soon as I can. I'll take off the oversized chipset heatsinks too for good measure. Thanks for offering to take a look
---
I've been following the guide that was emailed to me, but the register doesn't appear to make a difference like it does on other MCP55 systems. Perhaps this supports the idea of an external PLL?
---
Almost forgot to take an initial CPU-Z shot for you. Here's the default stuff. CPU-Z appears baffled by this chip so far.
Click for details.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I love the cpu-z it shows 0nm !!! LOL!I'll get some high-res shots of the board as soon as I can. I'll take off the oversized chipset heatsinks too for good measure. Thanks for offering to take a look
---
I've been following the guide that was emailed to me, but the register doesn't appear to make a difference like it does on other MCP55 systems. Perhaps this supports the idea of an external PLL?
---
Almost forgot to take an initial CPU-Z shot for you. Here's the default stuff. CPU-Z appears baffled by this chip so far.
Click for details.
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
SUCCESS!
Found a version of the nVidia control panel that -doesn't- crash me. It can do virtually nothing and thinks my PCIe clock is 2.5GHz, but it does what I need. HTT multiplier and HT base.
Demo:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Awesome! Now let's see 3GHz
You teaser!
Show me more!!
Also upgrade CPU-Z
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Awesome. Can't wait to see how far it'll go!
At 2.5GHz right now--haven't tried higher. Stable enough for Cinebench, but I haven't tested further. I'm going to wait until I know this board is good or not with CPU2 before I risk blowing it up. Hard to ask for a replacement if I melt the VRMs. Granted, I'm at default voltages and at frequencies less than other retail models.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Jesus that would be a fun rig on LN2. Doubt they'll ever release a 6-core black edition for Socket F though
what sort of score did it get at 2.5GHz on cinebench with 6 cores?At 2.5GHz right now--haven't tried higher. Stable enough for Cinebench, but I haven't tested further. I'm going to wait until I know this board is good or not with CPU2 before I risk blowing it up. Hard to ask for a replacement if I melt the VRMs. Granted, I'm at default voltages and at frequencies less than other retail models.
Found the CPU-Z 1.52 beta...much better!
Ignore voltage. Everything is still at the default vCore of 1.25V and vNB of 1.175V.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Gratz on getting it going man! Nice work....
I would assume your running a 32bit OS based on the Cinebench score, good score for a 32bit OS!
Good luck getting the other chip cranking, that sure looks like a fun rig to play with...
AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case
First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks