@unclewebb, look at the 2a image/post and you will find the calibration settings as well, well it was a long post so it's easy to overlook it ans scroll past it. :innocent:

I have downloaded prime95 and used it in the test above but when it runs it only uses 1 core in the RealTemp "Test Sensor" test. Is it really that much difference between prime95 and prime2004 when testing the "small FFT" ?

I cropped the 1280x960 images to 800x960 as it is easier on the weblayout on forums and not much more was seen except that that it showed 1 x prime95 and 3 x prime 2004 at the clock, so the names of the images are abit misleading as "4x(99)-P95" means 3 x Prime2004 at (99-100%) and 1 x Prime95 at (99-100%) taken a "Print Screen" at the "Heat Up Phase" as close to 100% as possible but it then shows 99% so it's pretty close anyway.

Have only tried the C1E before but it was unstable and crashed games like Crysis and I haven't tried the EIST which was in the bios when they updated my bios from F6 to F7 when then motherboard was on RMA. If EIST works better then I will try it later on.

Well if you look in post/image 2a you'll see that the in RealTemp 33C 33C 33C 33C, and core 0 and core 1 showed to low idle temp at 0.0 calibration ( 32C ) and had to be turned up a notch to show 33C, compared to T-Balancer cpu-D1 digital sensor even that I let it run for a while to see if it stabilized it was the closets to 33.5C as possible. It is of course possible that cpu-D1 gets influenced by other heatsources at idle as the CrazyCool surrounds the bottom of the TRUE and memory blows by it. There are many possibilities for temperature errors when the probe is not drilled into the heatsink etc.