MMM
Page 10 of 27 FirstFirst ... 7891011121320 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 651

Thread: Corsair revisits CPU cooling: introducing the Hydro Series H50

  1. #226
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    952
    This is what I have been waiting for ever since the soft launch....need some reviews/...this is by far the best option as far as I am concerned and if it can beat my current air cooling setup this is it. I just dont have the time or the dollars for a proper WC setup.

  2. #227
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbeard View Post
    We are sending out a huge lot of review units so you should see a lot of reviews of this thing trickle out over the next few weeks.
    Welcome back, and thanks for the update
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  3. #228
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cumbria, UK
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbeard View Post
    We are sending out a huge lot of review units so you should see a lot of reviews of this thing trickle out over the next few weeks.
    Good to hear.....

  4. #229
    Corsair Rep
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by nsegative View Post
    Welcome back and thanks for the info. Hopefully the June release is on target despite the review units only going out now XD
    Some of the review units have been sent out already, it just takes time to see the results come back. CPU coolers take a lot of time to test because it's largely useless just to test the cooler we send out by itself, they have to have a couple other coolers as a benchmark, in effect, making it like a mini-roundup.

  5. #230
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cumbria, UK
    Posts
    177
    I forget to say 'Hope your better too'

  6. #231
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbeard View Post
    Some of the review units have been sent out already, it just takes time to see the results come back. CPU coolers take a lot of time to test because it's largely useless just to test the cooler we send out by itself, they have to have a couple other coolers as a benchmark, in effect, making it like a mini-roundup.
    Then you should tell the reviewers if they want more stuff from Corsair they better damn well hurry up cause the XS community is getting impatient
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  7. #232
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cumbria, UK
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    Then you should tell the reviewers if they want more stuff from Corsair they better damn well hurry up cause the XS community is getting impatient
    Liking that

  8. #233
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    29
    Any reviews ? Those with sample units .. give us a mini - review please !!

  9. #234
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Thessaloniki Greece
    Posts
    39
    I suppose we have to wait for a couple of weeks?
    Γηράσκω αει διδασκόμενος!

    PC:just a pc

  10. #235
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by sosna View Post
    I suppose we have to wait for a couple of weeks?
    A store with a place holder said end of june they'll be getting units.
    MSI P67 GD65 B3
    2500k 4.8
    GTX480 835/1650/2000
    8gb ram
    Win7

  11. #236

  12. #237
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    579
    disappointing results
    Intel i7 2600k, Asus p8p67 EVO, Thermalright Archon, G.Skill RipjawsX 8GB, Asus EAH6970 DCII, Corsair AX850W, Asus xonar essence ST, Coolermaster HAF 932,
    Crucial C300 128GB, WD Caviar Black 1 TB, Samsung F3 1TB.

    The world needs your support.
    Join The XS WCG team and help cure Cancer, AIDS, and other diseases.

  13. #238
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    40 minutes while real temp indicates 20 minutes ? :p Also the NB will get far better cooling with the TRUE setup. Results are not valid to me till H get's it properly setup (airflow wise)

    Awaiting more results and the sample to test...
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 06-17-2009 at 12:11 AM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  14. #239
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by [cTx]EagleRock View Post
    disappointing results
    +1

    If the results were atleast as good as the TRUE i'd have baught this.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  15. #240
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    29
    ^ Same here
    Hoping to check some other reviews as well .. but seems it won't be able to match the TRUE , which is rather disappointing .. was expecting better results to be honest .

  16. #241
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by PhenomII2 View Post
    ^ Same here
    Hoping to check some other reviews as well .. but seems it won't be able to match the TRUE , which is rather disappointing .. was expecting better results to be honest .
    TRUE performance is enough, all I want is high-end air performance and clear my socket space for other gemicks
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  17. #242
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Look closer into the review, many many flaws there... did they check the mounting ? seems like a rush job to me, just to get it out first.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  18. #243
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    TRUE performance is enough, all I want is high-end air performance and clear my socket space for other gemicks
    Exactly same here ! .. on my CM 690 .. i always end up with cuts on my hand when mounting .. not TRUE's flaw or anything .. just that the case is cramped .. this would have worked out perfectly .. but well
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Look closer into the review, many many flaws there... did they check the mounting ? seems like a rush job to me, just to get it out first.
    I agree , Corsair has a very good rep .. and generally all their products are great , so yea will wait for a few more reviews .

  19. #244
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Look closer into the review, many many flaws there... did they check the mounting ? seems like a rush job to me, just to get it out first.
    +1 wait for someone respectable to do the review
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  20. #245
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    why is the heat coming out of the back of the case hotter on the corsair than on the true, that alone shows the fan on the corsair is letting heat build up from either being too slow, or there is more heat being removed.

    and why the top of the case has cooler air for the true is beyond me. since the corsair should be removing all the heat out the back, while the true may let some cycle through the case.

    sadly it looks like they ran them at vastly different fan speeds, and/or couldnt mount it right. (a 20c jump from idle to the first seconds of benching sounds way to extreme. it should take about 5-10 seconds before the copper plate even warms up if mounted right, not 1-2 seconds)

    too many weird results

  21. #246
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    why is the heat coming out of the back of the case hotter on the corsair than on the true, that alone shows the fan on the corsair is letting heat build up from either being too slow, or there is more heat being removed.

    and why the top of the case has cooler air for the true is beyond me. since the corsair should be removing all the heat out the back, while the true may let some cycle through the case.

    sadly it looks like they ran them at vastly different fan speeds, and/or couldnt mount it right. (a 20c jump from idle to the first seconds of benching sounds way to extreme. it should take about 5-10 seconds before the copper plate even warms up if mounted right, not 1-2 seconds)

    too many weird results
    The corsair was sucking air IN from the back, pumping cool air through the radiator, so hot air from radiator was pushed into the case.
    E8500 E0 @ 4.05Ghz (9x450)
    8GB(4x2) G.Skill Pi Black 800 @ 900Mhz
    Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
    Xigmatek S1284EE

  22. #247
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruroni View Post
    The corsair was sucking air IN from the back, pumping cool air through the radiator, so hot air from radiator was pushed into the case.
    lol, im at work so i could only watch the video, couldnt listen to it. and that sounds like a really epic failure for a test case. the heat coming out of the top should be identical for both setups as long as the airflow is the same.

    still waiting for a good review...

  23. #248
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    From the looks of it, the setup left much to be desired...

    1> The TRUE setup uses one more fan (the exhaust fan).
    2> Not only that, but the "exhaust fan" in the corsair setup was put on push (intake) mode, thus killing airflow and getting hot air from the radiator to hit the mobo.
    3> The side fans in the stacker just ed up things more. You do not design airflow this way (that goes for both setups), you just end up adding turbulence to the system. Choose your strategy (positive or negative pressure), and adjust your setup accordingly.

    I'm waiting personally for a frostytech review so that we can see the cooler efficiency under clean conditions (bench table, stable watts to dissipate for all solutions). Also, we need to see results for lower rpms and watts (maybe spcr will pick up a sample). This kit is still more suited to a HTPC rig, not an overclokced i7 one (not that it should not aim that category)...
    Last edited by Dante80; 06-17-2009 at 06:10 AM.

  24. #249
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by Dante80 View Post
    I'm waiting personally for a frostytech review so that we can see the cooler efficiency under clean conditions (bench table, stable watts to dissipate for all solutions). Also, we need to see results for lower rpms and watts (maybe spcr will pick up a sample). This kit is still more suited to a HTPC rig, not an overclokced i7 one (not that it should not aim that category)...
    Agreed. Frostytech is the best

  25. #250
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    Agreed. Frostytech is the best
    I wouldn't say that, even for them. The reason is that they do not use a reference fan for all comparisons, but change from time to time or use the included fans. That makes for some nasty mistakes, like TRU getting 2c colder than TRUE (due to more CFM from the fan used). You can still guess the differences by adding the dB in the equation, but...the damage is already done. At least they test each setup with different fanspeeds (where applicable)

    What is good about frostytech though, is that (bar fan configurations) they use the same procedure for a vast variety of cooling solutions, for both companies, and for 3 different heat (watt) levels. That gives us a rough table to get some hard data without the procedure screwing up with the comparisons....
    Last edited by Dante80; 06-17-2009 at 06:21 AM. Reason: typos T_T

Page 10 of 27 FirstFirst ... 7891011121320 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •