Results 1 to 25 of 133

Thread: Anandtech i5 preview

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by JumpingJack View Post
    Anand has the CPU, he clearly noted it would not bump past 1x. Regardless, I can reproduce his numbers pretty easily with my hardware but I will talk to him and see if that was indeed true.
    Well those C10 numbers show i5 @2.66 being approx. one bin faster than i7@ 2.66Ghz. The only reason could be turbo boost being higher than on i7 part.i7 920 should do ~2793Mhz ,if not more, in single threaded apps.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Well those C10 numbers show i5 @2.66 being approx. one bin faster than i7@ 2.66Ghz. The only reason could be turbo boost being higher than on i7 part.i7 920 should do ~2793Mhz ,if not more, in single threaded apps.
    Maybe the Uncore speed. I guess the uncore is OCed on the Lynnfield. There is a bunch of unknown values. Did Turbomode kick in or not. Did it exceed the TDP value define in BIOS etc etc.
    Last edited by Shintai; 05-30-2009 at 03:43 PM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Well those C10 numbers show i5 @2.66 being approx. one bin faster than i7@ 2.66Ghz. The only reason could be turbo boost being higher than on i7 part.i7 920 should do ~2793Mhz ,if not more, in single threaded apps.
    Anand has mixed his cinbench results before, Scientia wrote a complete article inferring the incorrect conclusion because he was comparing 32-bit to 64-bit runs, I shot him an email I will see if he can provide an explanation.

    32-bit single threaded, for example, I only see +1x bump


    This is because windows scheduler is distributing the load across all cores (real and virtual).
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Well those C10 numbers show i5 @2.66 being approx. one bin faster than i7@ 2.66Ghz. The only reason could be turbo boost being higher than on i7 part.i7 920 should do ~2793Mhz ,if not more, in single threaded apps.
    Thanks to the BCLK @ 166Mhz the core i5 was probably running @2822Mhz when the turbo mode was active, and that could explain why it was faster in some benchmarks.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Sapo84 View Post
    Thanks to the BCLK @ 166Mhz the core i5 was probably running @2822Mhz when the turbo mode was active, and that could explain why it was faster in some benchmarks.
    I think it has more to do with it than that -- using Bclk and nothing else OCs the memory and NB, the latter being more important for performance in these simple benches.

    Jack
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •