Doesn't really matter if intel drops the 920 to, since there are still the UP xeons, and they are binned better anyway :p
Last edited by Shintai; 05-28-2009 at 03:56 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
--Intel i5 3570k 4.4ghz (stock volts) - Corsair H100 - 6970 UL XFX 2GB - - Asrock Z77 Professional - 16GB Gskill 1866mhz - 2x90GB Agility 3 - WD640GB - 2xWD320GB - 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F4 - Audigy-- --NZXT Phantom - Samsung SATA DVD--(old systems Intel E8400 Wolfdale/Asus P45, AMD965BEC3 790X, Antec 180, Sapphire 4870 X2 (dead twice))
We already saw it from JC. Plus its a HT vs no HT bench
And the picture from the original site also only showed 1 DIMM.
Nothing better than to try twist the truth right? Its also a pretty straight forward to know i5 performance. Since the only difference between j5 and i7 is QPI vs PCIe and 1 memory channel difference.
Last edited by Shintai; 05-28-2009 at 04:03 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Yeah they're the same alright, but still they don't act the same. Found a post here, but it must be more of a BIOS issue than anything else.
Anyway I'm not surprised at all about this change, the €250 920 is just too good to be true if Intel wants to sell some i5 too. This ain't gonna help much as long as the Xeons stay though.
Wasn't the possibility of this happening discussed before on this forum? Although we have no confirmation if this is true or not I certainly remember the gist of weither or not moving to the 1366 would be worth it or not.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
When thers a difference, then that, that a avarage Xeon will clock better then a avarage 920 (both D0). As for the bioses, blame asus for not fully supporting the xeons in consumer boards (duno if they fixed it already). Other board makers made there homeworks and they work just like normal i7s.
Bookmarks