Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P Thread

[chew*]

those 2 back timings tend to agree with the platform better for everyday use.

[charged3800z24]

those 2 back timings tend to agree with the platform better for everyday use.

I'll give it a shot, thanks

[suphiceto]

Chew, I might get this wrong but are you saying that, keeping bank cycle at 28 or 30 is better for everyday stable clock setting regardless of latency and cyle timings?

[chew*]

yep 28 better for 1333, 1600 depends on ram but 28 or 30 is a good setting.....lose nothing performance wise gain a little stability and possibly higher clocks, not by much but a little, this is for 24/7 use of course.....

Feel free to expreiment when benching.

[suphiceto]

yep 28 better for 1333, 1600 depends on ram but 28 or 30 is a good setting.....lose nothing performance wise gain a little stability and possibly higher clocks, not by much but a little, this is for 24/7 use of course.....

Feel free to expreiment when benching.

Thanks I didnt know that, for some reason I always thought the bank cycle was suppose to be latency+row cycle.

I also dont know anything about Command Rate Timing, is it better to keep on 1T or 2T and what is the difference?

[chew*]

Thanks I didnt know that, for some reason I always thought the bank cycle was suppose to be latency+row cycle.

I also dont know anything about Command Rate Timing, is it better to keep on 1T or 2T and what is the difference?

In a perfect world yes.....Sometimes its better to keep intergrated memory controllers happy though........the laws of ram are more or less guidelines.....they can be broken and do defy the laws quite often.