Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: X25-M vs (2) X25-M RAID 0

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    These results just reflect my setup, which I would think is a somewhat typical setup. I would also think that most people don't have multiple SSD in RAID 0 to install from. As far as raiding two OCZ drives showing better improvements, that is understandable because the performance of 1 OCZ (core series probably) drive may not be able to deliver the data fast enough for the intended program, so when you add a second drive it would show a gain(or larger gain).

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by Griff805 View Post
    These results just reflect my setup, which I would think is a somewhat typical setup. I would also think that most people don't have multiple SSD in RAID 0 to install from. As far as raiding two OCZ drives showing better improvements, that is understandable because the performance of 1 OCZ (core series probably) drive may not be able to deliver the data fast enough for the intended program, so when you add a second drive it would show a gain(or larger gain).
    You will see some nice improvements in IOMeter bootup config, and some heavy app loading/games/utilities etc. Did some testing for myself with the stopwatch a while ago, and there was indeed some pretty good improvements...
    | Ci7 2600k@4.6ghz | Asus SaberTooth P67 | Sapphire HD7970 | Samsung B555 32" | Samsung 840 PRO 128gb + 2xIntel SSD 520 120GB Raid0 + 2xC300 64GB Raid0 | Corsair Vengeance 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24 | Vantage GPU=40250 |

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Griff805 View Post
    These results just reflect my setup, which I would think is a somewhat typical setup. I would also think that most people don't have multiple SSD in RAID 0 to install from. As far as raiding two OCZ drives showing better improvements, that is understandable because the performance of 1 OCZ (core series probably) drive may not be able to deliver the data fast enough for the intended program, so when you add a second drive it would show a gain(or larger gain).
    I'm still confused... what's the point of this?

    As far as I can see, you've basically shown that copying files from a single drive to another single drive or a RAID0 stripe is the same. What am I missing here? I'm not trying to be a jackass, I just don't see the point when the source of your installs is the limiting factor in either case.
    Last edited by virtualrain; 05-27-2009 at 10:53 PM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    597
    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    I'm still confused... what's the point of this?

    As far as I can see, you've basically shown that copying files from a single drive to another single drive or a RAID0 stripe is the same. What am I missing here? I'm not trying to be a jackass, I just don't see the point when the source of your installs is the limiting factor in either case.
    Some people like to backup and store Installation ISO's on their hard drive.
    But still, boot/load times might be useful even if they are the same.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •