3DMark06 is heavy CPU-limited in this case because it's not a 965 but a 920@stock
3DMark06 is heavy CPU-limited in this case because it's not a 965 but a 920@stock
Stock i7 920 and...
- HD4870 @ 820/1000: 14400 (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818978)
- HD4890 @ 850/1000: 16000 (http://www.ocheaven.com/news_view.asp?gid=6754)
Considering 3DMark06 is actually a CPU benchmark the increase is CRAAAZY.
You were not supposed to see this.
That gpu score of 9801 in vantage is pretty darn good. For reference, a stock 4870 1gb at hardware canucks scores a 8724 so thats 12.3% increase which seems about right.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-10.html
Mr.BSEL,
HD4890 also has a 13% higher core freq.
And HWC's benches are with a 3.85GHz Yorkfield.
You were not supposed to see this.
Lol, certain someone still has tough luck with statements related to ATi.
You were not supposed to see this.
It's incredibly hard to verify speeds based on 3dMark06 across the systems
That said, its GPU score in that puts it very close to a GTX 285, and slightly above the GTX 280
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
HD 4870 1GB + Cat 9.3 (same system) = 10 360 3dmarks ... (7 percent lower score)
Last edited by OBR; 03-18-2009 at 11:01 AM.
Last edited by LordEC911; 03-18-2009 at 11:10 AM.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
That should be about right, considering this:
http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?di...inTotalPoints=
Perkam
Last edited by perkam; 03-18-2009 at 11:19 AM.
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gbboot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
OBR:its really 4890 or only simulation HD4870 OC?(i read some about 13% up in 3dmark )
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
try extreme preset.
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
18594 for the engineering sample then?
Out of curiosity with an i7 920 what does a 4870x2 and a GTX 285 score on average to compare?
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
i will test GTX 260 + 280 today against, on the same machine
Now OBR, good posts to reclaim "some" lost cred you've had in this forum, keep it coming sir.![]()
I will wait for results from someone who knows how to use hardware.
Crosshair IV Formula
Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
C300 64G
Corsair TX 850W
CM HAF 932
1. Dont be envious LowERun, that i have everything HOT HW and you nothing ...
2. Its time for reality for ATi Dreamers ...
Welcome AMDus Rebrandus, ONE year of waiting for Oced HD4870! Great success (okay, tested with no official and oddity drivers - results are not final)!
Performance is really between GTX 260 (216) and GTX 280 - ideal for GTX 275!
PS. Not tested by me, but friend!
Last edited by OBR; 03-19-2009 at 04:58 AM.
Tnx for the benches OBR !
I know now what my next card is.
CPU : Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
MB : Asus P5E X38 Rampage bios
RAM : Team Xtreem 4x1GB DDR2 OPB handpicked
VGA : Sapphire 4870
Power : Antec Quattro 850w
Storage : 1 x 60GB OCZ Vertex + 2 x 750gb WD 32Mb
DVD : Samsungs DVDwriter Sata + Liteon DVD
Sound : Creative XFI Xtrememusic
Cooling : D-Tek Fusion + D-Tek Fusion GFX
Monitor : Samsung 226BW
Errorcode : An error occurred at address AC 20 DE AE FF BC ...... System halted.
Bookmarks