Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: phenom ii - no vid card with 4 cores enabled

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130

    Unhappy phenom ii - no vid card with 4 cores enabled

    Hi all,

    I finally bought the parts and assembled the system.
    (GA-MA790GP-UD4H, Phenom II x3 720 Black Edition)

    ACC to auto works, 4 cores.
    But with that set, the mobo seems to be unable to initialize the Graphic cards.

    I tried with a 8800 GT and a Radeon x700 pro.

    After ACC is changed it simply doesn't find cards, only the integrated hd 3300 works. If I disable the integrated one in bios, it still doesn't use the PCI-E one, one long, 2 short beeps for "video failure".

    Any suggestions how to get that working?
    Maybe someone has a modded bios which just enables the cores but does not trash video management?


    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    waukegan
    Posts
    3,607
    clear cmos

    take out battery on the motherboard and unplug it ( computer ) from the wall for 30 seconds
    mobo: strix b350f
    gpu: rx580 1366/2000
    cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
    psu: coarsair 1kw
    hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130
    Already tried cmos clear, in fact it's what i do when i don't get any video signal.

    As soon as I enable ACC again graphics card fails to initialize (except the integrated one).

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    852
    I'm getting mildly corrupted color on some desktop icons, taskbar icons and parts of some application GUIs.
    3D'06 runs great and looks great, games look great but sound is crackely, even windows sounds while booting. reinstalled sound, graphics, chipset drivers = no change.
    Disabled EAX and Crystalizer = tiny bit better but unacceptable
    Sound and color was perfect before unlocking 4th core.

    GA-MA790FXT-UD5P, 720BE 0904EPMW, F3b, X-FI, HIS 4870

  5. #5
    D.F.I Pimp Daddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Still Lost At The Dead Show Parking Lot
    Posts
    5,182
    I assume all works well when only three cores is enabled? If so this would be a really Good Example of why people should not be looking to enable a Core that has been disabled for a very good reason obviously. Please correct me if my assumption is wrong on everything working if only 3 core enabled.
    SuperMicro X8SAX
    Xeon 5620
    12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
    Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
    Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    179
    The one and only way to bring back the video is by killing the 4th core and go back to the original 3 cores.
    Intel® Core™ i7 920@200x21=4.2Ghz w/1.312v HT on
    Asus P6TD Deluxe
    H2O by Petra's Tech CoolKit Elite Rev.2 w/D-TEK FuZion V2
    EVGA GTX 580
    OCZ3P1600LV6GK 7-7-7-24-1T 6GB
    OCZ Vertex 2 50Gb in Raid-0
    Super Talent UltraDriveGX 128Gb
    WD VelociRaptor 300
    Corsair HX850W
    Windows 7 Professional 64


    AMD Phenom™ II X6 1090T BE @ 4131Mhz(243x17)
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    this has nothing to do with the 4th core brother, this is def a driver issue.

    he needs to do a full reinstal of OS and then look at getting updated drivers for all his bits, i suspect the sound driver is the issue.

    i would instal everything, and leave the sound driver to last, and give it a try without that driver.

    then instal sound driver, to see......... my spidey senses are tingling with this one

    edit: yes if you enable the 4th core it appears ehhh? again i suspect windows just doesnt like it, did you instal the OS with the 4th core enabled, or just enable the 4th core on a 3 core instal?

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130
    I don't think its the obvious "the core is defect" thing.

    With 4 cores and IGP graphics iam able to bench the 1024M run of wPrime for example. So i doubt it is that core which prevents bios init when enabled .

    I suspect there is something wrong with the chipset registers when enabling ACC on phenom II or something like that, maybe related to a specific hardware combination in that case.

    It even boots into windows (i can hear the sound) when the video card could not be initialized and the integrated graphics is set to disabled.

    Definitely not a driver issue, the BIOS is unable to initialize video, so it can't be a driver issue.
    BIOS beeps say "unable to initialize video" - and the cards fan stays at full speed all the time.


    Yes, the 4th core is shown and does prime calculations without faults, the speed increase is existent too.
    Last edited by Mad-Marty; 03-12-2009 at 12:40 AM.

  9. #9
    D.F.I Pimp Daddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Still Lost At The Dead Show Parking Lot
    Posts
    5,182
    I guess we shall see Pre-Boot is Bios not O.S
    SuperMicro X8SAX
    Xeon 5620
    12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
    Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
    Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~

  10. #10
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,524
    On AM3 board with ddr3: 720 can run the 4th core ok, but with limited fsb and nb freq scalling.
    720 cheaper price is for a reason

    Get 810 or 940 for real 4cores oc
    Last edited by Dumo; 03-12-2009 at 01:15 AM.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130
    I suspect strange things happen with ACC because it is not designed for Phenom II, so maybe setting registers that are used for something else on Phenom 2.
    Well maybe someone finds out which MSRs are going to unlock the cores only and the strange side effects will go away with special modded bios versions.


    The core seems ok, when doing calculations.
    Maybe its not the core at all, but the chipset which reacts strangely on the ACC setting when a Ph2 is installed?

    Would be good to know what happens to X4 users when they enable ACC, maybe they get strange effects too ?!
    Someone here with a X4 volunteers to try that?
    Last edited by Mad-Marty; 03-12-2009 at 03:35 AM.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    i have a x4 here, and to be honest havent even tried ACC yet, ill give it a go when i get back from work.....7 hrs from now lol.

  13. #13
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Sounds more like a motherboard problem (probably a BIOS bug) regarding ACC than the chip itself. Also, it can't be a driver issue since he doesn't get any video during POST--way before Windows or anything can come into play.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,489
    BIOS bug. For instance F3b has same S3 sleep issues as F3 but F4d and F4g do not. This happens with or without 4th core enabled, so obviously is the BIOS (not saying for sure in your case, just giving an example... it is not always the 4th cores fault)
    Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by Brother Esau View Post
    I assume all works well when only three cores is enabled? If so this would be a really Good Example of why people should not be looking to enable a Core that has been disabled for a very good reason obviously. Please correct me if my assumption is wrong on everything working if only 3 core enabled.
    It never hurts to try. You've already posted the same thing on a few threads. It's like saying people not to hit 6 GHz on chips cuz it's not meant to go that far. People did it with the Radeon 9xxx series, and the Geforce 6s, so why not PhII X3? If it doesn't work, try to get it to work. If it still doesn't, you run out of luck. Some issues are simply bios related, while others are related to the 4th core.

    I should be buying one PhII x3 720BE tomorrow , something to fill me up before going for a PhII x4 925, whenever it's coming out.
    Last edited by blindbox; 03-13-2009 at 05:11 AM.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    i have a x4 here, and to be honest havent even tried ACC yet, ill give it a go when i get back from work.....7 hrs from now lol.
    Thanks soundood,
    what did your X4 do under ACC?

    Did it POST at all?

  17. #17
    D.F.I Pimp Daddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Still Lost At The Dead Show Parking Lot
    Posts
    5,182
    Its just a thought for you guys to think about is all Do as you wish fellas you bought it
    SuperMicro X8SAX
    Xeon 5620
    12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
    Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
    Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad-Marty View Post
    Thanks soundood,
    what did your X4 do under ACC?

    Did it POST at all?
    sry mate i got distracted with my new toy, yes it did post, but does nothing at all, at the moment i still get prime fails at 4.1 gig, regardless of ACC, this was tried with auto/each core and so on.

    this has got me wondering though, the SB750 had this added later yeah, to support and aid the phenom I's, in thier clock potential, but then this was dropped, under a year later and serves no purpose to further Phenoms II's?

    seems a bit odd to to me, has anyone achieved a better clock from ACC with a Phenom II?

    if not, why not? if yo know what i mean.

    i think i fried this board anyway, needs an RMA

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    SW OK
    Posts
    157
    Damn, sound sorry to hear you cooked your new board .you on the trusty ax78 now?
    PH II 550 x2@X4B50 3.2 1.35v
    M4A79X-EVO
    2x2 corsair 1600 Dominator
    LITE-ON 16X DVD BURNER
    HIS 5770
    swiftech mcr220,apogee gt,mcw30,mcp655,micro-res
    PCP&C 610 silencer
    black stacker 810



  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5
    You need to set "First Display Init" to PEG. It's probably set to PCI.

    I have the same exact setup the OP has. PhenomII X3 unlocked to X4 and Gigabyte GA-MA790GP UD4H. Disabled onboard video and using a 8400GS (rig is not for gaming, I just didn't want my system memory sucked up by the onboard GPU even though it has dedicated 128MB sideport mem). I had to set the First Display Init to PEG, then disable the onboard GPU. Works fine. Oh, Windows Vista 32.

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1
    Sounds strange, maybe its the card
    Last edited by BGinner; 03-15-2009 at 06:07 AM.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    sry mate i got distracted with my new toy, yes it did post, but does nothing at all, at the moment i still get prime fails at 4.1 gig, regardless of ACC, this was tried with auto/each core and so on.

    this has got me wondering though, the SB750 had this added later yeah, to support and aid the phenom I's, in thier clock potential, but then this was dropped, under a year later and serves no purpose to further Phenoms II's?

    seems a bit odd to to me, has anyone achieved a better clock from ACC with a Phenom II?

    if not, why not? if yo know what i mean.

    i think i fried this board anyway, needs an RMA
    Sorry to hear, whats wrong with the board now?



    Quote Originally Posted by keysplayr View Post
    You need to set "First Display Init" to PEG. It's probably set to PCI.

    I have the same exact setup the OP has. PhenomII X3 unlocked to X4 and Gigabyte GA-MA790GP UD4H. Disabled onboard video and using a 8400GS (rig is not for gaming, I just didn't want my system memory sucked up by the onboard GPU even though it has dedicated 128MB sideport mem). I had to set the First Display Init to PEG, then disable the onboard GPU. Works fine. Oh, Windows Vista 32.
    Tried that actually - Booting up with the onboard, then setting first init to PEG, but thats a no go. Just beeps saying card could not be initialized.

    I even noticed when I enable ACC while my BFG 8800 is attached, the system will power off (and i can't power it on simply, it will just shut off again until cmos is cleared).

    So only way to enable ACC for me is to put the card out, enable, boot with integrated graphics - works fine then.

    Thats a crazy incompatibility i think ...

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •