Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: X25-M RAID0: More useless benchmarks. Sick of them yet?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257

    X25-M RAID0: More useless benchmarks. Sick of them yet?

    EDIT: Sorry, just realized theres a whole section on Benchmarking... please move thread if desired.

    Just got my X25-M 80GB RAID0 configured. Thought I'd go ahead and post all the
    benchmarks in one shot-

    Configuration:
    Asus P5Q-Pro
    Q9450 @3.4
    8GB DDR2
    HD4850
    2x X25-M RAID0 connected to ICH10R 128k Stripe.
    Vista x64 SP1
    No "Tweaks" other than turned off page file, disabled defrag. That's all.

    ATTO:


    CrystalDisk:


    HDTach Long:


    HDTune:


    HDTune Random Read:


    MFT- Wow... Not an MFT Partition, just running the built in bench-:


    Last, but not least- PCMark Vantage:


    That's it-
    Last edited by Griff805; 02-19-2009 at 08:49 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    any chance you can run the test in the IOmeter thread?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Levish View Post
    any chance you can run the test in the IOmeter thread?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    375
    Damn, looks like I'm have to pick me up a pair of these. Besides the benchmarks, do you have any stuttering issue with these in raid what so ever?
    i7 940/Rampage 2 Extreme/Corsair 6g Dominator/Corsair HX100W/GTX 580/SSD

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by StickyRICE View Post
    Damn, looks like I'm have to pick me up a pair of these. Besides the benchmarks, do you have any stuttering issue with these in raid what so ever?
    Stuttering has not been an issue at all- single drive or RAID These drives are awesome.

    Though, be aware of the performance degradation. I have not noticed anything yet, but you might want to wait till Intel comes out with a new firmware, or at least a new statement about future fixes.

  6. #6
    the jedi master
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Manchester uk/Sunnyvale CA
    Posts
    3,884
    fill it up Griff, then see if it does not stutter.
    Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
    Have a look over here
    Tony AKA BigToe


    Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony View Post
    fill it up Griff, then see if it does not stutter.
    What is considered full? - (not being sarcastic)

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Hmm, I'm trying to fill it to the brim, but it keeps finding new space??

    I had 760MB or so left on C:, I then tried to copy and paste a 300MB file, checked the C: drive and it had almost 3GB free.. ?? Strange.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    It doesn't seem to be negatively effecting my computer so far... Here's a little clip if you're interested. Still runs too fast for the program to record the smooth movement.

    http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/111498/Video2.avi

    Video may not work yet, still uploading to dropbox.
    Last edited by Griff805; 02-20-2009 at 01:47 PM.

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    I just was shown this today in another thread. Intels Remap Fragmentation problem on them there drives.

    http://arstechnica.com/news/2009/02/...x25-m-ssds.ars

    "Two of their writers, pleased as punch with their new X25-Ms, began to be disappointed after long use seemed to slow the drives down. They reran the same benchmarks from their earlier review, and found a dramatic reduction in performance. They then began to run more detailed test, and their article on the results is worth reading.
    It turns out that the remapping, which creates a swiss cheese of small fragments in the remap table, causes large files later written to those sectors to take up many small fragments on separate blocks. As drives, age, PCPerspective found, performance decreases dramatically on all kinds of workloads. In some instances, sequential reads were reduced to a mere 22MBps, slower than some laptop hard disks. "


    "Neither is there a clear route to resetting the remap table. Intel told PCPerspective it was working on a good solution, but that one isn't available yet"

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] riptide View Post
    I just was shown this today in another thread. Intels Remap Fragmentation problem on them there drives.

    http://arstechnica.com/news/2009/02/...x25-m-ssds.ars

    "Two of their writers, pleased as punch with their new X25-Ms, began to be disappointed after long use seemed to slow the drives down. They reran the same benchmarks from their earlier review, and found a dramatic reduction in performance. They then began to run more detailed test, and their article on the results is worth reading.
    It turns out that the remapping, which creates a swiss cheese of small fragments in the remap table, causes large files later written to those sectors to take up many small fragments on separate blocks. As drives, age, PCPerspective found, performance decreases dramatically on all kinds of workloads. In some instances, sequential reads were reduced to a mere 22MBps, slower than some laptop hard disks. "


    "Neither is there a clear route to resetting the remap table. Intel told PCPerspective it was working on a good solution, but that one isn't available yet"
    Yeah, I'm not too excited about that issue. However, like Ender has done, I'll have a process of getting my drives refreshed every month or so.

    Hopefully Intel will have a fix out soon, but as of right now, as you can see in the vid I posted, everything is great.

    Anyone watch the vid yet? Could you get an idea of how quick my system is running?

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    Dling now. I also use dropbox

  13. #13
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Grande Prairie, AB, CAN
    Posts
    6,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Griff805 View Post
    Anyone watch the vid yet? Could you get an idea of how quick my system is running?


    The video is WAY to big. You know like 95% of people don't use a 30" display.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
    The video is WAY to big. You know like 95% of people don't use a 30" display.
    I don't either... I use 2-

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Crete,Hellas
    Posts
    164
    Which firmware version do you have guys on yours X25-M ?
    I got 1 yesterday and it has the 045C8610...both drives on that PC Perspective test they have the v8610..
    Whats yours..?
    Workstation
    P5E3 Deluxe
    Q9650 @4.0GHz (L826A974)
    Intel X25-M 80Gb(Win7 x64)-Samsung MLC64 -WD500
    8Gb Crucial Value D9JNM
    GTX 260& Eizo L768
    CobaNitrox 600w
    WC (Laing DDC1T-Enzotech cpublock-B/Ice Stealth 360)
    TT Armor

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by Griff805 View Post
    Stuttering has not been an issue at all- single drive or RAID These drives are awesome.

    Though, be aware of the performance degradation. I have not noticed anything yet, but you might want to wait till Intel comes out with a new firmware, or at least a new statement about future fixes.
    Thats cool, what about say during a big program install while sufring the web with mulitiple small writes to the disk? I thought I read somewhere that intel stated that the drive degration was due to the synthetic benchmarks that was use, and that normal day to day use would be less noticable?
    i7 940/Rampage 2 Extreme/Corsair 6g Dominator/Corsair HX100W/GTX 580/SSD

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •