MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 34 of 34

Thread: Dead daneb

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,756
    Saaya dude, it's Deneb not Daneb
    Crosshair IV Formula
    Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
    6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
    4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
    C300 64G
    Corsair TX 850W
    CM HAF 932

  2. #27
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Mine was a 3700+ San Diego which no longer boots with more than one stick of RAM Socket 939 but same thing (1.35vcore, 3.74vdimm, IMC).
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    460
    my ram is rated 2.3v for 1066 runnings, 1.8v for the 800 and I have been @2.34v ever since getting the 940's, now I am beginning to worry.....

    my vote is something else killed the sillycon, i would never run 1.7v unless I had the Prometia unit attached to the CPU.....

    bummer, at least we are not reading of massive failures across the board, yet.........

    laterzzzz................
    Asrock 970 Extreme4, Vishera 8320 @4.6Ghz, 1.39v, 16 gig Gskill RipJaws X DDR3 2133 @2284, OCZ 700w, OCZ Vetex 4 256gb boot, ATI 6850, all on big air..

    smoke and mirrors

  4. #29
    Xtreme Cruncher Russ_64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    850
    Well according to Everest 5 the K10 IMC has a max of 2.9 vdimm and AMD specs for PII is max 1.6v, so I think it was probably the vCore that killed it .........
    Asus Maximus VIII Ranger Z170 : Core i5-6600K : EVGA RTX2080 XC : 16Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 : 256Gb Crucial MX500 : Corsair H100i : PCP&C 750w 60A : CM Cosmos S : Windows 10 x64
    Asus Z8NA-D6 : Dual Xeon E5645 : 24Gb DDR3-1333 ECC : MSI GTX470 : 120Gb Samsung EVO 840 : 1TB HDD : PCP&C 750w 60A : CM Stacker : DD MC-TDX, EK-FC470, RX240+RX120, D5 X-Top, BayRes : VMware ESXi 6.7.0 - VM's - WCG crunchers x 5 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS), Mint 19, Windows 10 Insider Preview
    Sophos XG 17.5.3 running on GA-Z97-Wifi : Core i3 : 8Gb DDR3-1600 : 120Gb SSD : Corsair H80
    BenQ GW2765, Aten 4-port KVM, Asustor AS5002 4Tb NAS, Belkin 1500va UPS, Sky Fibre Max 80/20Mbps


  5. #30
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Saaya dude, it's Deneb not Daneb
    oh really? lol, my bad

    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    Mine was a 3700+ San Diego which no longer boots with more than one stick of RAM Socket 939 but same thing (1.35vcore, 3.74vdimm, IMC).
    lol, for how long? 3.7 is really pushing it

    Quote Originally Posted by bldegle2 View Post
    my ram is rated 2.3v for 1066 runnings, 1.8v for the 800 and I have been @2.34v ever since getting the 940's, now I am beginning to worry.....

    my vote is something else killed the sillycon, i would never run 1.7v unless I had the Prometia unit attached to the CPU.....

    bummer, at least we are not reading of massive failures across the board, yet.........

    laterzzzz................
    nah, dont worry man, just a one off so far, and like most people said, it was very unlikely that vdimm killed it, maybe vcore, or it was a freak accident.

    Quote Originally Posted by Russ_64 View Post
    Well according to Everest 5 the K10 IMC has a max of 2.9 vdimm and AMD specs for PII is max 1.6v, so I think it was probably the vCore that killed it .........
    2.9 max for 45nm? thats impressive... i wonder if its going to be the same for the ddr3 imc, and if yes, then why intel cant get the same vdimm range working.

  6. #31
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    2.9 max for 45nm? thats impressive... i wonder if its going to be the same for the ddr3 imc, and if yes, then why intel cant get the same vdimm range working.
    Probably process/design differences would be my guess.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  7. #32
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    lol, for how long? 3.7 is really pushing it
    Two months?

    They're Kingston HyperX, very nice PCBs because they're still 100%. I'm not worried about hurting the BH-5 ICs at all, they're rated at 5v but PCBs that can handle 3.6v+ 24/7 are veeeeeery nice
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,557
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    Hi All,

    Just a heads up, heard from a friend that his daneb died after a couple of weeks, probabaly cause of vdimm.

    vcore 1.5-1.7v
    vdimm 2.3v at all times
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...d.php?t=217888


    killed an X3 with a 3.5vdimm cpu@1.4v my X4 ES has been running several weeks @vcore1.5-1.65v vdimm@2-3.1v no troubles so far



  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    california
    Posts
    59
    IIRC the early Phenoms had a rash of dead CPUs due to high vdimm over 2.3v
    Thats why I held back on the DDR2 8500 because of the 2.0+ Vdimm required.
    In fact I bought nothing but the Gskill 6400 from the start of am2+ because it ran at 1.8v. Try and track down where I read that.
    asrock 990fx 8120 Gskill 2133
    Asrock 890FX 1090t Gskill 1600 c7
    DFI 790FXB M3H5 965 Gskill 1600 OCZ evo 720w
    DFI 790FXB M3H5 965 Kingston 1333 Mushkin 600w
    DFI 790FXB M2RSH 955 Gskill 1333 OCZ evo 720w
    DFI LP Jr PII720 Gskill 1066 Seas 600w Sapph 4670
    DFI 790FX PII720 @200x16 Gskill 1066 Mushkin 550w
    DFI LPnf4 ultra D opt 148@300x10 Cruc 4000 Fps500w

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •