I'm hoping this means a $200 4870x2.![]()
I don't know if it's wrong and how you know it is wrong, but i think it's a good hypothesis/explanation. Do you disagree with this? Where am i wrong? If it is a 55nm why didn't they released it earlier. As i said before i think they could foresee what they could do in 55nm, so ati should have gotten the r790 ready, and released it as soon as 285 released as a response. Otherwise i don't see why would they delayed it so long.
Trust me, he brought up a similair, short, and stuck-up statement in the last RV790 thread.
Won't explain where he derives this from, so I treat it as nothing more than a fanboy's post.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe that it is 40nm. Just telling you "how he thinks it is wrong."
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
E8400 @ 4.0 | ASUS P5Q-E P45 | 4GB Mushkin Redline DDR2-1000 | WD SE16 640GB | HD4870 ASUS Top | Antec 300 | Noctua & Thermalright Cool
Windows 7 Professional x64
Vista & Seven Tweaks, Tips, and Tutorials: http://www.vistax64.com/
Game's running choppy? See: http://www.tweakguides.com/
by the time this thing comes out, it will be too little, too late, instead of trying to bring a new chip into the world, they should learn how to make drivers.
0_o What stuff are you smoking?
ATI has been ahead of the curve in the high end GPU market for 6 months now. The GTX 295 and 285 will be too little too late if ATI decides to take out the R8xx series by Summer '09, with this being the stop gap solution, like the GTX 260 SUPERWTFBBQ revisions we've been seeing.
Perkam
I didnt mean it as in nvidia will have something faster, what i meant is by releasing this, then 6 months later releasing the RV800 series (remember 7950GT and 8800GTX?), it is too little too late, which means people who already own a 4800 series card would be wasting money upgrading to a 4890, just like people who own a gtx 280 would be crazy to upgrade to a gtx 285, same thing, different company, as for other people who may want to upgrade, im sure they wouldnt mind waiting till the end of the year for better offerings from both sides, now as i look at the upcoming games for 2009, i see nothing special that will challenge anything higher than an 8800gt as all games seem to be xbox 360/ps3/pc games, which ofcourse means pc users just get a port. Hope this clears up some things. And no i wasnt kidding about their drivers, they suck to me, i know many people love it and thats fine, keep it to yourself, my opinion is ATI cannot make drivers if their life depended on it. Also to add a little something to what PERKAM said, ATI having the edge in the high end, well let me put it this way, i dont think that is totaly true, my reason being, the 4870x2 is two 4870 1GB's put together, so you have 2 mid-high end gpu's together, yes it becomes faster than any one gpu setup, intill nvidia releases the gtx 295 and takes back the performance crown, now if you look at the gtx 295, it is twi gtx 260's with 240 cores enabled running at gtx 260 speeds. So the GTX 260 was faster than the 4870 after all, in most cases. So as far as i am concerned nvidia has the high end for a single GPU which is ofcourse the GTX 285, till a "true" dual core GPU comes out, i mean something that doesnt need a profile or a driver update to work properly, i can only consider a single fastest GPU holder to hold the crown, hopefully you understand what i am trying to say, anyway these are my thoughts i dont expect everyone to agree, but im sure some people share the same vision as me.
Last edited by GAR; 02-16-2009 at 09:37 PM.
Yes, nvidia's drivers are superior, my belief is a powerful GPU is nothing without a more powerful driver, i mean whats the point in having all that power without something driving it. Try to play FEAR with crossfire enabled with a 4870x2 frame rates suck, stuttering occours, disable crossfire and it works better, now tell me what is the point in having the fastest single card, when in reality it is not a single card, it is 2 cards in one, just like crossfire and just like sli. So nvidia had the high end all along by putting 2 gtx 280's together, cuz all the 4870x2 was 2 4870's after all.
YAH it is! Ive driven by there a couple times, wanted to check it out and buy a mouse pad or sumthing.
on topic: " AMD will add two SIMD units to bring up the shader total to 960 and the texture units to 48. " from Nordic Hardware. it'll bring the performance up for a while longer, no need for a new arch already; 770's working just fine.
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
ill definitely get 4890 1gb
but what about 4890x2.. when ?
Very interested in 4890x2 myself especially if all the supposed performance increase numbers turn out to be correct. GTX 285 SLI performance (with superior aa performance) in a single card solution sounds awesome.
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gbboot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
Of course they have friends. That doesn't mean you're one of them.
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
Q3-4 my next upgrade 300 series nothing in games is needed more than a gtx260-280 til 2010
[QUOTE=LOE;3663435]who cares about your upgrade dude, that thread is about RV790 and I don't see it in your post[/QUOTEMONEY WASTE STIL NO CRYSIS WARS MAX ALL SETTINGS 60FPS LMFAO
60fps minimum!
X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab
Bookmarks