Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 119

Thread: Thermochill PA140.3 Prototype Pics

  1. #51
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    153
    In answer to whoever it was who asked about how much more surface area I have done a rough calculation (rough being the main word there).

    Assuming both rads have the same folds per inch and thickness

    PA120.3 = 380mm long and 120mm wide = 45600mm˛
    PA140.3 = 420mm long and 140mm wide = 58800mm˛

    Percentage increase in facial surface area = 29%

    This is slightly less than some people may have expected as the fan spacing is closer the PA140 rad is only 40mm longer rather than 60mm.

    Once again this calculation is very very rough no actual measurements have been taken.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,771
    will this possibly fit in a LL 343b? It looks like it will be a very tight fit.
    Asus Rampage Formula X48
    Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
    OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
    Palit 4870x2
    Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
    Corsair HX1000
    LL 343B Case
    Thermochill 120.3
    2xMCP355
    KL 350AT
    KL 4870X2 FC WB
    DD Chipset Block

  3. #53
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Webby View Post
    In answer to whoever it was who asked about how much more surface area I have done a rough calculation (rough being the main word there).

    Assuming both rads have the same folds per inch and thickness

    PA120.3 = 380mm long and 120mm wide = 45600mm˛
    PA140.3 = 420mm long and 140mm wide = 58800mm˛

    Percentage increase in facial surface area = 29%

    This is slightly less than some people may have expected as the fan spacing is closer the PA140 rad is only 40mm longer rather than 60mm.

    Once again this calculation is very very rough no actual measurements have been taken.
    Thanks for the calculation. Based on the length of a 120.2 and a 120.3, could you also do a rough estimate for a 120.4? That would be fantastic man!
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  4. #54
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    510mm long and 120mm wide = 61200mm^2

    EDIT: to those who know...is this a PA140.3 or a PB140.3? (not necessarily PB exactly, but a revision that has progressed past the PA design)

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    100
    I´m REALLY happy to see 140mm rads to come. I think this or RX140mm series (if they make them) will replace my XSPC RS360 rad from bottom of my case in future (thats why I bought RS360 and it was good quality one and its doing really well cooling my Q6600)..

  6. #56
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by AlucardCasull View Post
    thats a big bish, way its going might as well just use the radiator from my civic.
    Nah, rad from your civic is probably aluminum
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  7. #57
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    153
    Yeah as Vapor says for a 120.4 it will be [(120*4)+(10*3)]*120 = 510*120 = 61200mm˛

    If they used 15mm spacing rather than 25mm then you would just get (120*4)*120 = 480*120 = 57600mm˛

    So if the PA120.4 follows the original PA120.X design it will have greater facial area than the 140.3 if it conforms to the more common 15mm fan spacing then they will be approximately the same.

  8. #58
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Webby View Post
    Yeah as Vapor says for a 120.4 it will be [(120*4)+(10*3)]*120 = 510*120 = 61200mm˛

    If they used 15mm spacing rather than 25mm then you would just get (120*4)*120 = 480*120 = 57600mm˛

    So if the PA120.4 follows the original PA120.X design it will have greater facial area than the 140.3 if it conforms to the more common 15mm fan spacing then they will be approximately the same.
    Good info. I hope it follows the traditional design... that way it would fit as a drop in replacement for the 120.3!
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    118
    Hmm I have 2-PA160's I wonder how that would stack up against the 140.3?
    Haswell, Maxwell, MLC

    My HeatWare 77-0-0

  10. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California Central Valley
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Petra View Post
    I'm kinda with 003 and Vapor here... I don't really see 140mm radiators as being particularly practical because they won't really work as drop-in replacements for 120's, they are quite a bit harder to work into most cases, and there isn't a very good selection of 140mm fans available right now.

    So, where's the quad fan version of the PA160?
    QFT.

  11. #61
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California Central Valley
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Webby View Post
    Yeah as Vapor says for a 120.4 it will be [(120*4)+(10*3)]*120 = 510*120 = 61200mm˛

    If they used 15mm spacing rather than 25mm then you would just get (120*4)*120 = 480*120 = 57600mm˛

    So if the PA120.4 follows the original PA120.X design it will have greater facial area than the 140.3 if it conforms to the more common 15mm fan spacing then they will be approximately the same.
    Umm... don't you need to account for fan spacing? If you do 120*4 then you're assuming that the fans are mounted right next to each other. Shouldn't those calcs be [(120mm*4)+(15mm*3)]*120mm = 63000mm^2 and [(120mm*4)+(25mm*3)]*120mm = 66600mm^2?

  12. #62
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Quote Originally Posted by Strages View Post
    Umm... don't you need to account for fan spacing? If you do 120*4 then you're assuming that the fans are mounted right next to each other. Shouldn't those calcs be [(120mm*4)+(15mm*3)]*120mm = 63000mm^2 and [(120mm*4)+(25mm*3)]*120mm = 66600mm^2?
    When fans are spaced at 15mm, they bump up to the next fan.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  13. #63
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    153
    I guess I should have explained fan spacing a bit better (Or at all ) it is the centre to centre distance between the mounting screws of the fans.

    As Waterlogged says with 15mm spacing you get no gaps between the fans with the current PA120.X they have 25mm spacing which puts a 10mm gap between each fan.

    Hope that explains it

  14. #64
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California Central Valley
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Webby View Post
    I guess I should have explained fan spacing a bit better (Or at all ) it is the centre to centre distance between the mounting screws of the fans.

    As Waterlogged says with 15mm spacing you get no gaps between the fans with the current PA120.X they have 25mm spacing which puts a 10mm gap between each fan.

    Hope that explains it
    Heh, I was wondering about that as I was writing the above post. :P
    Core i7 920 3839A C0 195x21@1.36v HT Disabled | Temps: 39C Idle, 63C Load
    Lian-Li PC-70: Apogee GTZ, Thermochill HE120.3 w/ 3x120mm Ultra Kaze-3000, Laing D5, Kill Coil
    Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5, F9e
    3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24-2@1.65v
    1024MB XFX GeForce GTX 280
    300GB VelociRaptor, 500GB Seagate 7200.10, 1TB Seagate SV35.3
    ASUS Xonar DX
    Antec Signature 850w
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Dell 2408WFP


    My Heatware

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post
    Nah, rad from your civic is probably aluminum
    psh, my civic is to fast for al. its copper, along with my engine block. that thing runs coooooooool
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/picture.php?albumid=144&pictureid=327

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    wondering if the 120.4 would be better or the 140.3 O_O

    I have a tj07 and wondering if either of these would even fit lol

  17. #67
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    I've never been afraid to run my rads external, constraining your system to all internal is a good way to impose unnecessary constraints. Some folks like the challenge of an all internal system build, I've never had the patience myself. I want something that performs well and very easy to maintain. I've had case enclosed rads before, and they have always been a nightmare to keep clean especially if they are tucked away somewhere. The exterior mounts on the other hand can be as big as you want and easy to take care of.

    With blocks and flow rate performance differences getting so tight these days, adding excessive rad capacity is an easy means to real gains and it goes hand in hand with silence if you want both silence and top performance, you need alot of radiator.

    Anyhow, glad to see more of the 140s...just hope to see some quads as well.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    153
    Things you need to consider are,

    1. Which will fit? If both will do you get better airflow from long and thin or short and fat?
    2. 4x 120mm fans more choice or 3x 140mm fans with limited choice (although its getting better)
    3. If they have similar facial area (depends on fan spacing on the 120.4) then can you get more airflow for the same noise from 4x 120mm over 3x 140mm? Or vice versa.
    4. Cost. This is an unknown currently.

    After you have considered that it is likely that the PA140.3 will have a lower pressure drop than the PA120.4 as it will have more tubes to split the flow, however this is probably negligible as the PA rads are not at all restrictive to begin with.

    In the end I think it will come down to space and fan choice.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,771
    Quote Originally Posted by mcoffey View Post
    Nope, not in the one I have if the actual size is close to the estimated size. Looks like the TC 140.3 would be around 11-14 mm to tall for an up front mount. Up top, you wouldn't be able to clear the frame rails or side panels.

    andyc
    Eh oh well I guess I can stop thinking about this one then. Maybe the revised PA120.3 will be better off.
    Asus Rampage Formula X48
    Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
    OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
    Palit 4870x2
    Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
    Corsair HX1000
    LL 343B Case
    Thermochill 120.3
    2xMCP355
    KL 350AT
    KL 4870X2 FC WB
    DD Chipset Block

  20. #70
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    Quote Originally Posted by Webby View Post
    In answer to whoever it was who asked about how much more surface area I have done a rough calculation (rough being the main word there).

    Assuming both rads have the same folds per inch and thickness

    PA120.3 = 380mm long and 120mm wide = 45600mm˛
    PA140.3 = 420mm long and 140mm wide = 58800mm˛

    Percentage increase in facial surface area = 29%

    This is slightly less than some people may have expected as the fan spacing is closer the PA140 rad is only 40mm longer rather than 60mm.

    Once again this calculation is very very rough no actual measurements have been taken.
    I have a PA120.3 in the front of my stacker STC-01, its cooled by 3 140mm yates, switching to the PA140.3 will be a breese and give me 29% more cooling without changing or moving the fans at all. Thats quite awsome!

    Edit: picture
    Last edited by eXa; 02-16-2009 at 06:56 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  21. #71
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Back and forth between Florida and Maine
    Posts
    4,097
    I like the idea of 140 mm fans. From my limited experience with a newer Lian Li case, they are very quiet. I definitely will be experimenting with one of these rads in the future.

  22. #72
    Never go full retard
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    3,984
    I just finally get to testing the 120.3 and they go and ready a 140.3...think my wife will notice the missing money from her hobby fund?
    Last edited by skinnee; 02-16-2009 at 07:20 PM.

  23. #73
    Engineering The Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    7,217
    140mm rads do NOT fit within 5.25" bays

  24. #74
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Back and forth between Florida and Maine
    Posts
    4,097
    Quote Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG View Post
    140mm rads do NOT fit within 5.25" bays
    True, but it's possible to remove the bays in some cases ...

    Why don't you design a prototype case for 140mm rads ?

  25. #75
    Engineering The Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    7,217
    Quote Originally Posted by shazza View Post
    True, but it's possible to remove the bays in some cases ...

    Why don't you design a prototype case for 140mm rads ?
    This I can do, however, it is easier just to use a v2010 or the like :\

    I will make a prototype for you all it may be rough and a few days though.

    the below pic is a gtx 420 in p80 drive bays
    Last edited by SNiiPE_DoGG; 02-16-2009 at 08:54 PM.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •