MMM
Page 2 of 33 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 812

Thread: AMD To Launch Radeon HD4890 "RV790" In April

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    128
    X2 Will be a stormer!!!!
    Lian Li V1000 Plus - Core i7 920 2.66 Overclocked to 4.1ghz 1.448v 20x 1.3v QPI Multi 205MHZ BCLK (Still Tweaking) & Watercooled With 2x Feser TFC Xchanger 120mm Rads, EK Supreme Acrylic CPU Block - XSPC Drive Res - Laing DDC-1T Ultra Alphacool Top - Rampage II X58 - XFX GTX 295 680/1380/1100MHZ- 3x2GB (6GB Total) Corsair Dominator Triple Channel DDR3 1600mhz - Tagan Piperock 1100W PSU - 2x WD Velociraptors Raid 0 - Windows 7 64Bit Ultimate Beta

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by swale View Post
    X2 Will be a stormer!!!!
    Indeed, where is it already?

  3. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,715
    20 percents higher frequency is not 20 percents higher performance ...

  4. #29
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    In marketing: CoreΔ%+MemoryΔ%=PerformanceΔ%
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    This card is very interesting to me if not only the clock speeds have changed cuz price/performance ratio is really good if could perform around GTX 285 levels but at 199 ~ $249. However if it's only clock speeds upped I wouldn't pick it up but I'd gladly try an ATI card for a change though.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  6. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    1,716
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    20 percents higher frequency is not 20 percents higher performance ...
    If the rest of the hardware is not bottlenecking the graphics card and if you raise all the clocks (on the graphics card) linearly for 20% then the card will perform exactly 20% faster.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
    If it has 800SP's then it is going to be 8~13% faster depending on game and settings, sometimes maybe less. But if it has 1000SP's like numerous rumors were indicating then it is going to be up to 40% faster. So in such case 20% in average makes sense.

    Anyway, I won't believe in anything about the future ATi graphics cards until I have them in my hands.
    They cannot create a shader core with 1000SPs. It is 960 or 1040SPs.

    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    20 percents higher frequency is not 20 percents higher performance ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    In marketing: CoreΔ%+MemoryΔ%=PerformanceΔ%
    Look who showed up to crap on the thread...
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  8. #33
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    In marketing: CoreΔ%+MemoryΔ%=PerformanceΔ%
    Just like the complete dominance of nvidia in 2008?


    xtremespeakfreely.com

    Semper Fi

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    I have a feeling that we are being mislead and there is more to this chip than thus far speculated. I don't expect a surprise as big as RV770 though, the chip is still based on the same underpinnings as RV770 after all.

    What's with the Shintai bashing? He's only making a simple joke.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    In marketing: CoreΔ%+MemoryΔ%=PerformanceΔ%
    (CoreΔ%+MemoryΔ%)/2=PerformanceΔ%

    ... should be true though (assuming RAM, framebuffer, CPU & drivers isn't a bottleneck).

    Anyway, currently owning a HD4850 512MB @ 800/1150 I see nothing interesting in this card, unless # of SP's gets a bump too from 800 to 960 or so. But I guess this card isn't meant for me.

    s754 PCIe; EPoX EP-8NPAJ // Claw 3700+ // 7800GTX // Cors BH-5 1GB // OCZ 520W // WinXP

  11. #36
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by rogueagent6 View Post
    Just like the complete dominance of nvidia in 2008?
    Don't forget he also said that there will be no L3 cache in Nehalem

    As for the RV790 ,it may very well be a tuned up R770,with a bit more shader/tmu power and higher clocks.This combination can net 20% over RV770 easily.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by CandymanCan View Post
    Um isnt the 4850 memory starved. Even with your core at 800, your still low on memory bandwith compared to the other cards. Like you assuming it isnt a bottleneck which clearly the 4850 has been proven to be.

    My 4850 is at 750/1100 and i cant wait to get off it. Its to slow.
    If You think HD4850 is too slow, then You obviously bought the wrong card!
    HD4850 is nothing but a well balanced $150 gaming card and won't cut it at high res AA gaming in newer games.

    I usually game at lower resolutions (1600x900 is my prefered res) without AA.
    HD4850 512MB handles it just fine.

    HD4890 with 100(+)GB/s mem bandwidth & 1GB framebuffer def needs to offer more than 850MHz on the core to make me wanna buy it. 960 SP's would be nice.

    s754 PCIe; EPoX EP-8NPAJ // Claw 3700+ // 7800GTX // Cors BH-5 1GB // OCZ 520W // WinXP

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by CedricFP View Post
    20% faster than 4870 - which would put it on par roughly with the 285 - the competition would obviously be on the price front.
    It serves a very good purpose though. Nvidia's been the one with the slew of new product launches recently. Not to mention the additional free marketing due to the uproar over all the renaming. AMD needs something new to show off and if they can match GTX 285 performance for $300 it will be a coup all around.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    well, we are only a few months away from dx11 cards though, arent we
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    Only 20% faster than the 285... no way that will compete head on. Price maybe, but not for sheer performance. But I bet it will overclock like crazy!
    280 to 285 is 20% more or less so why not?
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  16. #41
    Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,957
    so, is this just a clock speed increase only?

    if yes, my 4870 can already do those speeds easily. just need to get better cooling on it

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    160
    hmmm we can always buy Sapphire Toxic 4870 780/1000 185$ on Newegg.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by CandymanCan View Post
    Most heatsinks and im betting your's only touch the core. The stock AMD heatsinks cool the memory and the mosfets. If you havent noticed and i belive this is one reason why they are a little warmer
    My HIS 4850 was a reference cooler and still ran 5-6C hotter memory.



    That's the 4870 being used now that I pulled the screenshots from. Gaming load is 55C at 45% fan which is inaudible over my case fans. ATI's reference cooler unfortunately is just not that great -- it could be, but it doesn't deliver.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    How did you measured the memory temperature?

  20. #45
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52
    I can't, and i don't want to believe that the only thing amd thought for the past 9 months (since the release of 4800series) was 100mhz core and 75mhz memory boost.

  21. #46
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Look who showed up to crap on the thread...
    Quote Originally Posted by rogueagent6 View Post
    Just like the complete dominance of nvidia in 2008?
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Don't forget he also said that there will be no L3 cache in Nehalem

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg 
Views:	1060 
Size:	101.4 KB 
ID:	94769


    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    What's with the Shintai bashing? He's only making a simple joke.
    exactly, that and nothing more.

    @card

    if it dont offers more sps/tmus im not intressted, my 4870 runs @840/1100 24/7

  22. #47
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by grimREEFER View Post
    well, we are only a few months away from dx11 cards though, arent we
    Yes we may be a few months (more like a half year+) away from DX11 cards but we're maybe a few years from proper DX11 support in games. Just about now the DX10 support is gaining importance.

    If you feel like paying a price premium for the unapproved entry DX11 cards be my guest, I feel like spending my money on mature DX10 card, GT212 or the RV790 or other possibly upcoming ATI card releases being my top contenders for next upgrade.

    Don't get me wrong, these entry DX11 cards could be very good too (maybe another "8800GTX") but I don't like gambling and the odds are on my side in the long run if choosing the just-b4-newgen-series cards.

    (sorry for my slightly sarcastic tone in the post, couldn't resist)
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  23. #48
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Ye, DX11 cards are very far away it seems. GPU sales already dropped 37% for AMD and atleast 40% or more for nVidia in Q4. Q1 will only drop further so we are down to way below 50% of the normal. Q2 will be the same, Q3. DX11 is Q4 or 2010. Not to mention that TSMCs 40nm node problems, aswell as TSMC is in utter disaster with some 60% decline for Q1.

    Even Intel went with value/mobile as a priority over servers, highend etc for 32nm.

    Each company tries on its own to survieve in these struggling times. Technology is just a luxory good. Something that gets axed as the first victims along with caffe late and crapple
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    400
    i don't understand why ppl still flaming the stock hsf on a 4870, as though it can't cool the card and it overheats and artifacts
    [IMG] [/IMG]

    as for the 4890, not sure if it's worth it for me, although i did pay 280 after tax for the 4870
    Rig 1 Asus ROG Strix B550-F WiFi, R7 5800x, 64GB Vengeance LPX 4*16GB, Zotac GTX 1070Ti, X-Fi Titanium, Enermax Revolution D.F. 850w, SSDs 768GB, HDD 3TB, CM 912HAF, NH D-15 Black.cr
    Rig 2 Asus Maximus VI Hero, i7 4770K@4000, 32GB Ballistix VLP 4*8GB, Gigabyte GTX 970, eVGA G3 850, SSD 512GB, HDD 2TB, TT Element-T, NH D-14.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    290
    45C idle means next to nothing. My 4850 would idle at 45C but that sure didn't stop it from hitting 83C load.

Page 2 of 33 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •