--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gbboot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
I can't say this is entirely TRUE but I have yet to find a new Q9650 (small box with white and blue on it) that has healthy sensors.
I haven't done enough comparisons to say that is a law.
I would wait and see how the new small box Q9650 are doing first, or get an old big blue box one from eBay.
Jorlbr where you getting that info from? Is that official or hearsay?
Just got back from o/c'ing my mates Q9650 1.225VID. So far so good and its done 4410Mhz P95 blend stable (overnight run) but the chip runs hot...i think its the tradeoff with a lower VID chip. So he is running it at 4.3Ghz atm @ 1.36v (dual back to back 30 run IBT stable, P95 not yet tested but P95 shouldn't be any problems)
Anyone else with a 1.225VID that runs say 5-10c hotter @ same volts vs a 1.25VID. I think they definetly have more o/c potential than there higher VID brothers but offset is strong cooling required
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gbboot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
Bookmarks