~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Well, if you haven't red my post, I'll quote my self:
TOPIC: "Anand: PII vs. Q9550 vs. i7 crossfire, Phenom II = smoother"Originally Posted by keithlm
QUESTION: "Explain how Phenom II is smoother than Core i7?"
I don't need to search for the answer, because Gary Key from Anand already answered:I would comment about then you'll have to search somewhere else for your answer.
How can anybody draw a conclusion that "PhenomII is smoother than Ci7" based on such comments of the author of the article and based on the numbers(just look at the crossfire results and imagine what will happen if the test were done with fastrer graphics cards)?Originally Posted by Gery Kay
What makes you think that you are appropriate to suggest me where I should read/post?I'd suggest that you move to Intel subsection
Is it because you don't agree with me or something else?
I already found tons of peoplewhere you find a ton of people that will discuss this with you.)ing on me, just because I don't share their opinon and/or bias.
I red the title, your conclusion, the article and authors conclsion. Like previously I still think that the topic is missleading because according to the author P2 940isn't "smoother" than Ci7 920(and what about the faster Ci7 models?)
It's my fourth language, so maybe I haven't understood you correctly.I'll give you a break here because I'm not sure whether english is your second language.
OK, All the comments in the article regarding i7 and P2 were suggesting that P2 isn't smoother nor is faster than i7, but it is the oposite...with the only exception in CoH where i7 had hikups unlike P2 which was running smooth. I was trying to figure out what leaded you to your conclusion and I thought that maybe it was the min framerate, where P2 shines.I said smoother gameplay AND higher min fps. The "AND" delineates them as two seperate items, so in actuality I said the exact opposite of what you though I said.
Last edited by gOJDO; 02-06-2009 at 01:47 AM.
I think because you own an i7 you are having trouble reading the title.
I understand that it could be seen as saying PII is smoother than i7, but that is not how I meant it.
The thread title means:
1. Author of article
2. Name of article
3. Intended point of discussion of article
Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
Currently I have 5 more PCs, but none of them with a P2. I love computers and hardware and since 1988 I have owned all types of x86 AMD & Intel desktop CPUs with the exception of K6-III, Yonah, Phenom I and Phenom II. So i7 is only one of many CPUs that I have had.
That's how I understood you, but it doesn't matter if it was misunderstanding or wrong interpretation. We're here to discuss and clear that up.I understand that it could be seen as saying PII is smoother than i7, but that is not how I meant it.
Well, I think that the author wanted to say that P2 940 is a better pick than Q9550 for gaming, but not better than i7. He was going to recommend i7 if the overall system price was lower.The thread title means:
1. Author of article
2. Name of article
3. Intended point of discussion of article
It seems like this thread going nowhere.
I7 is faster and PII is cheaper. If peeps prefer to game with I7 then good for them, if PII bring back the fun that went awol since P1 then go for it.
The problem is not the drivers
The problem is not the chips
The problem is the unpredictable humans playing the game
You're not doing what the chip predicted it would do
The chips have a path all figured out, but human does't follow that path and the chip has to figure out a new path
It's just more noticable when the Intel chip has to recover because of its bigger caches
Just follow the path for maximum fps
BAD HUMANS
Cheers
Deathstar
![]()
Have you seen that in some tests i7 is very fast on low resolutions, but if you increase the resolution it slows down considerably. It wins easy on low resolution but is sometimes the slowest on higher resolutions. Can you explain that?
I think that I very strange anyway. One reason could be part of the explanation is that i7 has a smaller cache compared to Phenom II and the cache isn't as effective when memory is fragmented.
Maybe you dont understand that just because something is faster doesnt mean its smoother?
I can throw you out of a plane without a parachute...as you are falling you go into cardiac arrest, your body goes into spasms and you are foaming at the mouth......youll defintely get to where you're going faster but I doubt it will be very smooth ride.
Last edited by Titan7171; 02-06-2009 at 05:30 AM.
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
of course the problem is that we have already had this discussion and everyone that posts in it now is just bringing up things that have already been said. so no more discussion about this. everything has been said, if you want to test the smoothness then people need to get a testing method and find 2 systems to test. otherwise this thread should just be closed.
But Ferrari F1 Team is sponsored by AMDSo AMD Core i7 ?
![]()
Last edited by Dzigit; 02-06-2009 at 06:48 AM.
I address the problem at the chipset, PCI-e. i5 should behave differently.
Deneb and Bloomfield have different cache implementation, so you can't draw conclusions from their cache capacity. Anyway, Deneb has less cache than Bloomfield:I think that I very strange anyway. One reason could be part of the explanation is that i7 has a smaller cache compared to Phenom II and the cache isn't as effective when memory is fragmented.
Deneb: 4x128kB L1 + 4x512kB L2 + 6144kB L3 = 8704kB total
Blomfield: 4x32kB L1 + 4x256kB L2 + 8192kB L3 = 9344kB total
As for the cache speed, i7 and and Deneb have roughly same L1 speeds, while i7 has much faster L2 and L3 caches. RAM performance is also much better on the i7. Further, the i7 has technologies like memory disambiguation which basically "hide" latency. With other words, cache and memory performance on i7 is much higher than on P2.
Since you seem to be in "review" mode let us actually look at what you said:
Then when somebody happened to mention that you are slightly incorrect you then attempt to switch the discussion to something that was NOT in the first post AND was not being discussed at that time in your previous post. Then you get angry when people don't want to discuss this new topic that you want to discuss.Read the first post. The op has defined "higher min fps" as smoother.
This is called baiting and switching. It is a form of trolling. You have yet again shown that you are not here with the intent of carrying on a constructive conversation.
BTW: THAT makes it appropriate for me to suggest you stop posting or move to another subsection. In addition as you have conveniently pointed out that I am NOT the only person that shares this sentiment.
Sadly we have to deal with little forum trolls like you derailing the thread yet again. (Yes I know you are going to claim you are not a troll. Most trolls honestly don't believe they are trolling.)
EDIT: Oh. And this little trolling antic has awarded you a one way trip to the ignore list.
Last edited by keithlm; 02-06-2009 at 07:30 AM.
FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3
larger L1 cache is better.
but I keep looking at I7 and I swear it's really got 8 cores lol it's like they did a trick or something to make it show up as 4 cores
take at look at cpu-z of cache associations L1 32 kbs 8 ways that's like double the core 2 duo 4 way L2 cache is the same 16 way and l3 cache is 8 way.
of course this is just some silly thoughts
The part in Bold Italic sums it all up pretty well.
What most feared it would happen, did happen.
Lots of crapping, bickering and flame baiting. I hope you guys had your fun (I don't mean all of you though).
Some guys here apparently feel the need to ruin it for others. Sorry for them.
Thread closed.
Rig #1
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 trying to figure out this POS board
2600k @ ?????
2x2Gb GSkill RipJaws-X 1333 (7-7-7-21)
ATI 5850
Coba Nitrox 750W
Watercooled with HK 3.0 CU, Watercool GPU-X³ 5870 Nickel, PA120.3, Laing Ultra with XSPC top
Rig #2
DFI UT P35-T2R (0317 bios)
E8200 @ 4000 (1.216V) / 4100 (1.248V) / 4200 (1.296V) / 4300 (1.344V)![]()
2x2Gb Chaintech Apogee GT PC2-8500
Powercolor 4870
Corsair 520HX
Watercooled with HK 3.0 CU, EK-FC4870, Feser tripple, Laing Ultra pump
Bookmarks