Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
So according to you, a 50fps difference makes no difference but 1fps (36fps compared to 35fps) all of a sudden becomes so noticeabe it warrants a thread in the AMD section in order to boost the ego of some disgruntled fanboys with a complex about their hardware? Before you ask me what I mean, let me tell you that you're known to have said several times how max fps means nothing. So you answer this question, based on your own illogical logic: does the difference between 1fps max and 100fps max make a difference. Like I said before, irrationality is not my forte.
ok please stop posting. they say laughing is good for your health but i swear after reading your posts i think i might live forever. no where did i say 1 fps was such a difference. you know the reviewer isn't even basing their claims on the results they are based them on what happened during the review and how it looked. and find a time where i have even said the word max in this entire thread. never once have i said max fps means nothing. max fps actually paints the picture. you might have cpu A with a max of 80 fps and a min of 15 fps and an average of 55 fps. then cpu B has a max of 65 fps and a min of 45 fps and an average of 55 fps. which one do you want? and even that doesn't have much to do with it because it has more to do with how it is the entire time not just the high points and low points. im just going off what the reviewer said it felt and looked like.