MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 184

Thread: AMD To Crank Up Phenom II Clock-Speeds Upto 3.50 GHz, Planning New Models

Hybrid View

  1. 02-01-2009, 07:51 PM #1
    G0ldBr1ck
    G0ldBr1ck is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Send a message via MSN to G0ldBr1ck
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Sorry if you don't get my sarcasm, it's actually not difficult to grasp for any normal thinking person. And please stop abusing the rolleyes smilie, it gets tiring; if only you used it when it actually counts. You make no sense with your posts and you're always adding attitude to match.
    Zucker, what do you ever add to these threads? seriusly all I ever see in these is a few people talking about hardware and then youl basicly post.........no its not, or no it cant, or FUD!!, or It can never happen..........then a few more on topic posts and then you again with the........no it cant, Intel's better, bla bla bla. Its a cycle that hapens in every News thread and you never bring anything to the topic. Why do you do this? I realy dont understand. Dont you relize that you make these threads unpleasent for those who realy do want to discuss the topic.

    It would be greatly appreciated if you would just let people discuss the topics they want to. Even if you dont agree and think they are out of touch with reality because they dont share your personal views.

    And yes, I know there are others that do the same the other direction but its 90% of the time only after you provoke them.

    Thanks
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
  2. 02-01-2009, 08:12 PM #2
    Zucker2k
    Zucker2k is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
    Zucker, what do you ever add to these threads? seriusly all I ever see in these is a few people talking about hardware and then youl basicly post.........no its not, or no it cant, or FUD!!, or It can never happen..........then a few more on topic posts and then you again with the........no it cant, Intel's better, bla bla bla. Its a cycle that hapens in every News thread and you never bring anything to the topic. Why do you do this? I realy dont understand. Dont you relize that you make these threads unpleasent for those who realy do want to discuss the topic.

    It would be greatly appreciated if you would just let people discuss the topics they want to. Even if you dont agree and think they are out of touch with reality because they dont share your personal views.

    And yes, I know there are others that do the same the other direction but its 90% of the time only after you provoke them.

    Thanks
    How did I provoke anybody when the news for the original post was already said to be fake? Once again, those of us who expressed skepticism at the news have been proven right..... well until AMD actually releases that product. Don't you think it's a little bit of frustration on the part of those who are basically defending a hoax? I mean how pathetic can it get? I never said Intel could do it; and I highly doubt AMD could and since the news turned out to be fake, wtf is with the hostility? It's clear some are pissed because of this, but please pick on someone else. Go to my first post and see what I typed before I had to defend my very pure and untainted record for recognizing PHII and calling it for what it is? And this from someone who nearly picked one up at the Microcenter the other day, but had to refrain from it since the Q9650 proved too irrestible.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules