i also emailed them last week about the nb.
yes oc'ing on this board is easy but i think i got a good phenom also. 3700mhz 1.425 is realy stable and is allowed to get hot at this speed.
so aircooling would be possible with this setting.
i also emailed them last week about the nb.
yes oc'ing on this board is easy but i think i got a good phenom also. 3700mhz 1.425 is realy stable and is allowed to get hot at this speed.
so aircooling would be possible with this setting.
amd 940 @ 3.5ghz stock voltage or 3.7ghz 1,425v home made cpu block 3616 mhz and 2210mhz nb stable
gigabyte ga-ma790fx-dq6
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 160-200 in idle , 750-950 load, with 2 rivatuner power profiles shortcuts.
2x 2GB OCZ Blade 8500 ddr2 1066 @ 1.85 volt
seagate barracuda 7200-11 1x500gb & 1x640gb (rip 1 500gb barracuda)
seagate barracuda 7200-12 1TB , very nice hd, 5 degree colder then the 640gb
windows xp 32
lian li pc-a70b
cooler master real power 850watt
Good idea.
I thought about doing this too. The more of us that contact them and ask for this the more likely we are to get it.
To Lightman and BertM
Did you contact them using the the gigabyte website?
I flashed F6 a few days ago. I was previously using F6B for several months. So far I haven't noticed any functional difference between that and this offcial one.
Things I'd like to see added/fixed are:
CPU-Northbridge voltage increase.
Fix the HyperTransport link frequency setting. Increasing above 2000Mhz doesn't work but decreasing below 2000Mhz does.
Chipset voltage setting only increases Southbridge voltage and not Northbridge voltage.
Auto RAM timings doesn't work (for my EPP RAM). Have to use manual.
They was such a long gap between the release BIOS F5 and official BIOS F6 (albeit with a couple of betas inbetween). I really hope we won't have to wait long to see tangible improvements in the next offical BIOS.
Phenom 9850 Black edition 0811 CPQW
OCZ Vendetta cooler
Motherboards : Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 BIOS F7b
RAM: 4x 1GB PC2-6400 Corsair CMT2X1024-6400C4 @ 4-4-4-12
Graphics card: Gigabyte 8800GT GV-NX88T512HPV1 with Zalman Vf-830Cu heatsink and Samsung VRAM
Case: Silver Thermaltake Soprano VB1000SWS
Powersupply: Solytech 600W SL-8600EPS
Hard disc drives: Maxtor 120 GB IDE hard drive, Samsung spinpoint 1TB 7200RPM 32MB cache SATAII hard drive
Windows XP Professional SP2 32bit/ Vista 64 bit SP1 dualboot
#Something like a phenom, something like a phenom...
Good thinking! I agree.
Yes, website.
I've spotted lack of Ganged/UnGanged selection in F6 and F6d. Also I'm starting to suspect they broken HDD management. Thing is I can't install Windows XP on my 3 HDD or SSD. After finishing copying files (phase I of install) I've got restart and message NTLDR not found. Wired is that it was fine before to install many OSes. I've even tried to disconnect all drives expect the one I wanted to put XP on. Still sameI flashed F6 a few days ago. I was previously using F6B for several months. So far I haven't noticed any functional difference between that and this offcial one.I will give it one more go with total BIOS clear and HDD repartitioning to rule out MBR virus or wired corruption.
Edit: After Clear CMOS and with only one drive install went smooth
Yes, wise words!Things I'd like to see added/fixed are:
CPU-Northbridge voltage increase.
Fix the HyperTransport link frequency setting. Increasing above 2000Mhz doesn't work but decreasing below 2000Mhz does.
Chipset voltage setting only increases Southbridge voltage and not Northbridge voltage.
Auto RAM timings doesn't work (for my EPP RAM). Have to use manual.
Auto RAM is working for me out of the BOX. My RAM is OCZ Reaper PC8500 2x2GB.
I hope so tooThey was such a long gap between the release BIOS F5 and official BIOS F6 (albeit with a couple of betas inbetween). I really hope we won't have to wait long to see tangible improvements in the next offical BIOS.
Edited
Last edited by Lightman; 01-27-2009 at 02:14 PM. Reason: EPP profiles are working fine
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Has anyone tried Windows 7 build 7000 x64 with this board and a raid-array? Just wondering, cause Im getting a 2.9 hdd performance ratio in experience index while all other scores went up compared to Vista. Driver issue or?
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Ah, Goldbr1ck to the rescue
SB600 Sata ports, there were also major problems installing catalyst drivers. The problem is u can really notice the choppy performance in windows, especially when maximizing and minimizing windows, it stutters so I didnt even try any benching or games yet.
As a side note, in Vista x64 Ultimate the seagate drives score 5.9
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
are you using the 8.12 beta drivers for win7? The Catalyst drivers have been a pain in the ass lately. you may need to run driverclean and to a fresh catalyst install.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Yup, exactly. 8.12 were the ones that created all the hassle (for vista x64). Sometimes the installation just hanged and u couldnt install them at all, dont even remmember how I solved that. I will try clean reinstall of 8.12 and if that doesnt help clean reinstall of 9.1
Edit: Attempt to uninstall catalyst drivers resulted with ati installer hang... tried to reboot in safe mode to run driver cleaner
but win was unable to boot and also unable to automatically recover. I will install windows again tommorow.
Last edited by -= rtz =-; 01-30-2009 at 12:18 PM.
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
problem is that unless you use somthing like DriverCleaner to remove all trace of ATI software first the problem will stay even after re-installing or using older driver
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
So I should use driver cleaner first? I wanted to try that actually, but then windows crashed beyond reparationWhich version of drivers are you using btw? And how many attempts or re-installs were needed before it finally worked for you?
![]()
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
I was using the 8.12 beta and it was just fine until Windows update snuck in a updated driver that was dated 8 days newer then the 8.12 beta and from then on the problems started. I went back to the 8.12 beta and problem was still there. Then I tried the Vista driver and still no fix. After that I ran DriverClean then installed 8.12beta from safe mode, now im good.
If all else fails you could always just go with a fresh Windows install. just make sure you dont install the drivers Win7 tries to give you thats dated 12/10. I believe the 8.12 beta is dated 12/2 I think.
Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 01-30-2009 at 09:28 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Conclusion: Goldbr1ck tried to help over PM but we were unable to determine what exactly was causing the low hdd experience index score in Win7 x64 build 7000.
Altho I ran 3dmark 06 there and got 101xx as opposed to vista64's 107xx.
Everest hdd benchmark 1 MB linear read was giving 168 MB/s avg, very close to the raid-0 raptors from Goldbr1ck, so I guess its just a fluke in the performance rating system of Win7.
Anyway, I ran into a bigger issue yesterday, and wanted to ask has anyone experienced this as well. What happened was a complete shutdown of the system out of the blue, while chatting in miranda, there wasnt any storm outside, I didnt accidently pull out the power cable or pressed the extension power cable switch with foot, it just came like a phantom. This board is running for a year now and half of that period the system is overclocked like in the sig, it never happened before untill yesterday.
Anyone ever experienced this? It happened on xp32 sp3 if it means something.
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
Is it working now?
If it is, then most likely PSU in your computer..
Happens a lot. Even today I had a call from customer with exactly same issue. PSU is slowly giving up. It can be motherboard as well, but for me ratio is 95%/5% for PSU.
If you can, try different unit.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Yup, its working allright. It happened only once, and PSU was my first thought as well. It booted immediatly from first attempt after failing with no problems. The system is running average 12 hours a day, but sometimes its over 48 hours uptime. I'll just monitor the situation for a while and if it starts to get more frequent, hell, Corsair is still few years under warranty so there should be no problems with that![]()
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
Allright, it shut down again today while in Idle. What I wanna ask u as this: I had a weird problem with XP SP3 where everest would show weird temperatures, f.e. in XP SP2, XP x64 and Vista x64 SP2 the temperatures were always fine. 29-32 C in Idle and both cores below 10 C, while in XP SP3 it could never go below 36-37 C in Idle, with both cores arround 15 C. It was like it had some small load in Idle constantly. I found this odd and I was messing with this problem for months.
Today after the 2nd shutdown (2nd total) I decided to blow out the dust from the PSU with a compressor (without disassembling it), altho I knew the chance of this helping the situation are miserable. Anyway... I booted up again, and found a pleasant surprise - the temperatures were "fixed", the Idle temps were finally the same as in other OS-es I mentioned, temperatures finally seem correct and realistic again, 30 C with both cores below 10 C.
So now Im starting to think, what if the high temps problem that was previously present was the cause of the pc shutting down? What the hell could cause this temp issue (I seriously have no idea anymore) and how come it fixed itself by a simple blow-out with a compressor??I repeat, I had done nothing xcept this simple blow-out dust job, no messing with software or hardware in any way.
Any ideas?
Edit: It shut down again and started to happen more often soon after I wrote this post, I am back on vista x64 for almost 3 hours and its working good so far. Will keep this updated.
Last edited by -= rtz =-; 02-10-2009 at 06:10 AM.
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
i have had several sudden restarts in xp sp3. always after playing gta for some time. but never shutdowns.
and it was during different states of cpu. sometimes idle, sometimes still with watercooling on gaming mode so cpu had a low temp, and once with cpu on 3700 mhz.
in sp2 i didnt have unexplainable crashes yet with the phenom.
Last edited by BertM; 02-10-2009 at 08:25 AM.
amd 940 @ 3.5ghz stock voltage or 3.7ghz 1,425v home made cpu block 3616 mhz and 2210mhz nb stable
gigabyte ga-ma790fx-dq6
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 160-200 in idle , 750-950 load, with 2 rivatuner power profiles shortcuts.
2x 2GB OCZ Blade 8500 ddr2 1066 @ 1.85 volt
seagate barracuda 7200-11 1x500gb & 1x640gb (rip 1 500gb barracuda)
seagate barracuda 7200-12 1TB , very nice hd, 5 degree colder then the 640gb
windows xp 32
lian li pc-a70b
cooler master real power 850watt
Well PC related problems are always explainable, we just sometimes dont know how to explain themI wish this was a simple crash instead of bad shutdowns like in your case, but what can you do..
Im running the system in vista x64 for 12 hours now and it hasnt shutdown yet. InterestingIm starting to think its XP SP3 related, but I guess time will tell.
5000+ BE - lapped @ 3250 MHz @ 1.42v / 24/7
TRUE 120 - lapped + 120mm Scythe Slipstream 1900 RPM
Gigabyte MA 790FX-DQ6 on F5 BIOS
2x1 GB Corsair DOMINATOR PC8500 + 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @ 930 MHz CL5 2.14v
Corsair HX 520W
Sapphire HD 3870 BLUE + accelero S1 + 2 x 120mm @ 890/1300 unlocked bios / stock voltage
RAID 0 - Seagate 2 x 250GB 7200.10 sata II 16MB c.
Coolermaster CM690
Dual Boot: Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 + XP SP3 x86
Anyone know any place that still has this board for sale? I found only a couple but they are priced near $300. I dont remember what I payed for the one I have but I know it wasnt that much.
Why did they ever discontinue it anyways?
Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 02-10-2009 at 09:08 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
double post.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
http://cgi.ebay.com/Gigabyte-GA-MA79...em270342931598
we need to tweak the bios if possible, im realy getting annoyed that we cant increase nb voltage in bios.
amd 940 @ 3.5ghz stock voltage or 3.7ghz 1,425v home made cpu block 3616 mhz and 2210mhz nb stable
gigabyte ga-ma790fx-dq6
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 160-200 in idle , 750-950 load, with 2 rivatuner power profiles shortcuts.
2x 2GB OCZ Blade 8500 ddr2 1066 @ 1.85 volt
seagate barracuda 7200-11 1x500gb & 1x640gb (rip 1 500gb barracuda)
seagate barracuda 7200-12 1TB , very nice hd, 5 degree colder then the 640gb
windows xp 32
lian li pc-a70b
cooler master real power 850watt
Is there any info when will the new bios be ready and donwloadable? I'm rather annoyed than irritated but I really need this nb voltage increase in BIOS.![]()
Last edited by Stuen4y; 02-26-2009 at 11:48 PM.
MPOWER|i5 3570K|TRUE Spirit 140|2x4GB+2x2GB|VTX3D 280X|SanDisk Extreme 120GB|HX520W|Arc Midi|G2222HDL|G400s+QcK|Xonar DGX
F1A75-V EVO|3870K|Venomous X|2x4GB|5830+DeepCool V400|F4EG 2TB|Solid 3 120GB|Silencer MKIII 500W|NZXT Source 210 Elite|IPS226V|Xonar DG
Overclock yourself, you must!!!
im irritated actualy, thinking of not buying gigabyte again.![]()
amd 940 @ 3.5ghz stock voltage or 3.7ghz 1,425v home made cpu block 3616 mhz and 2210mhz nb stable
gigabyte ga-ma790fx-dq6
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 160-200 in idle , 750-950 load, with 2 rivatuner power profiles shortcuts.
2x 2GB OCZ Blade 8500 ddr2 1066 @ 1.85 volt
seagate barracuda 7200-11 1x500gb & 1x640gb (rip 1 500gb barracuda)
seagate barracuda 7200-12 1TB , very nice hd, 5 degree colder then the 640gb
windows xp 32
lian li pc-a70b
cooler master real power 850watt
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
MPOWER|i5 3570K|TRUE Spirit 140|2x4GB+2x2GB|VTX3D 280X|SanDisk Extreme 120GB|HX520W|Arc Midi|G2222HDL|G400s+QcK|Xonar DGX
F1A75-V EVO|3870K|Venomous X|2x4GB|5830+DeepCool V400|F4EG 2TB|Solid 3 120GB|Silencer MKIII 500W|NZXT Source 210 Elite|IPS226V|Xonar DG
Overclock yourself, you must!!!
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Bookmarks