are you positive them are d9's? i didnt think any 2x2gb kits were d9's... if they are i might be making a switch... anyone know of some nice low pro ram heatspreaders?
are you positive them are d9's? i didnt think any 2x2gb kits were d9's... if they are i might be making a switch... anyone know of some nice low pro ram heatspreaders?
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
Check post 4 that I'm updating now.Originally Posted by crazydiamond
I would say they are d9's, version 1.1 was d9 regardless of size, just cant run the timings as tight with 2x2 gig , You can't get these anymore and the fact that i found them is miracle.
High end air results page 1 post 4 added, this is about as good as it gets on air, I will update with 3d benches with my HD4870 in a few days.
Last edited by chew*; 01-29-2009 at 11:08 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
I have 6 sticks of that ram I havent been using. 4 are version 1.1 and 2 are version 1.2 are they all d9?Check post 4 that I'm updating now.
I would say they are d9's, version 1.1 was d9 regardless of size, just cant run the timings as tight with 2x2 gig , You can't get these anymore and the fact that i found them is miracle.
High end air results page 1 post 4 added, this is about as good as it gets on air, I will update with 3d benches with my HD4870 in a few days
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
yep and with 2.2 volts they should kick ass, thay are like crack to overclockers.... and no longer available.
Current versions can't even do rated timings/speed. 2x1 gig sticks of version 1.1 or 1.2 should do 4-4-4-10 ddrII 1000
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
damn, wonder why I ever put them up in the closet when I could be using them
noticed the version 1.2 is rated at 2.1v and the 1.1 is rated at 2.2v? still think they are same ram?
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
yep.damn, wonder why I ever put them up in the closet when I could be using them
noticed the version 1.2 is rated at 2.1v and the 1.1 is rated at 2.2v? still think they are same ram?
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Ran into some memory issues, and some vidcard issues, I think for the most part I have them sorted out now.
If all works out as planned I should be able to take down some card specific 3d records, one of which is my ownand a trifecta for 01 to 05, first attempt will be on air.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks