Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted

**equinox1** · 01-26-2009, 06:43 AM

21557 http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=14

phenomII 940 @ 3895 mhz
sm 2.0 7901
sm3.0 11608
cpu 5203
saphire 4870x2
hope cat 9.1 comes out soon, i can not seem to get trifire to work at all. scores lower than 4870x2

**VoodooProphetII** · 01-26-2009, 01:46 PM

19817

Sorry no a submitted result....

SM 2.0 8054
SM 3.0 8870
CPU 5835

GTX 280 - clocks in screenshot

**AMDDeathstar** · 01-26-2009, 02:48 PM

Originally Posted by msimax

good results ppl, AMDDeathstar do you have a link for the last score

Sorry Boss, that was first test run, here's the one I'm submitting

3DMark06 22746
SM2.0 score 8382
SM3.0 score 12138
CPU Score 5543
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9774488

Phenom II 940@ 3.9Ghz
M3A79-T
CFX 3x 4870's 780/1000 512
4GB (2x 2GB)@1125
Vista Home Ed. 32bit
Cat 8.12
Oops.. rushed the screen shot, second CPU-Z should have been memory
NB spd 13x211=2743 mem spd@ 562

**msimax** · 01-26-2009, 04:09 PM

*updated* equinox1 what your current gpu setup and VoodooProphetII i need a link for the score

**Titan7171** · 01-26-2009, 08:39 PM

Originally Posted by AMDDeathstar

Sorry Boss, that was first test run, here's the one I'm submitting

3DMark06 22746
SM2.0 score 8382
SM3.0 score 12138
CPU Score 5543
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9774488

Phenom II 940@ 3.9Ghz
M3A79-T
CFX 3x 4870's 780/1000 512
4GB (2x 2GB)@1125
Vista Home Ed. 32bit
Cat 8.12
Oops.. rushed the screen shot, second CPU-Z should have been memory
NB spd 13x211=2743 mem spd@ 562

sweet score man

a little update just to play it safe

3DMark Score 22399
SM 2.0 Score 8770
SM 3.0 Score 11,111
CPU Score 5746

AMD Phenom II 940 @ 4.14ghz
Asus M3A79-T Deluxe
2X 2gb G-skill 1066
Sapphire 4850x2 @ 700/1150

4850x2(single card)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9779982

**caveman_2** · 01-27-2009, 04:31 AM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9789549

3DMark Score 21364
SM 2.0 Score 8248
SM 3.0 Score 10421
CPU Score 5779

AMD 940 3.96ghz
4870 x2 750/950

**~~KELL5~~** · 01-27-2009, 06:00 AM

Originally Posted by AMDDeathstar

here's the one I'm submitting

3DMark06 22746
SM2.0 score 8382
SM3.0 score 12138
CPU Score 5543
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9774488

that's a belter of a score there AMDdeathstar, congrats buddy

**vfx** · 01-27-2009, 06:16 AM

Looks like I finally killed one of my 3870's

Time to upgrade I guess

**BertM** · 01-27-2009, 06:22 AM

17174 with one 4870 1gb (the version with heathpipes, not the toxic though)
future mark reports my cpu speed wrong.

cpu 3815 mhz, phenom II
gpu 815 mhz memory 975mhz

3DMark Score 17174 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 6477 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 7836 Marks
CPU Score 5598 Marks

**HondaGuy** · 01-27-2009, 01:58 PM

Update: Took out my 9850 and pop'd in my 940

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9795131

Motherboard:M3A79-T
CPU & Clocks:PhenomII 940 @3.8
Graphics Card & Clocks:Sapphire HD 4850 CF 690/1188
Memory & Clocks: 4x1Gb DDR2-1066
SM 2.0 Score:8070
SM 3.0 Score:9643
CPU Score:5609
3DMark Score:20372

**msimax** · 01-27-2009, 06:12 PM

bertm can you post the link to that score thanks

**cdawall** · 01-27-2009, 07:48 PM

the GPU can do 830core/2200mem/2050shaders and cpu can do 4ghz but i am about as oc'd as my little PCP&C 510w will go....

i will however rerun it with the cpu @3.9ghz 236*16.5 ram@12xx CL6 to get a bit better score

specs on this

phenom X4 945BE ES
Zotac 8800GTS 512mb stock cooler for now MCW60 sitting next to me
2x2GB crucial reds
Asus Crosshair II Formula
PCP&C turbocool 510w SLi

**demonkevy666** · 01-27-2009, 07:59 PM

Originally Posted by cdawall

the GPU can do 830core/2200mem/2050shaders and cpu can do 4ghz but i am about as oc'd as my little PCP&C 510w will go....

i will however rerun it with the cpu @3.9ghz 236*16.5 ram@12xx CL6 to get a bit better score

specs on this

phenom X4 945BE ES
Zotac 8800GTS 512mb stock cooler for now MCW60 sitting next to me
2x2GB crucial reds
Asus Crosshair II Formula
PCP&C turbocool 510w SLi

seem strange that the 945 is hitting lower cpu points then 940 at an OC?

Hyper transport affected maybe.

**Lightman** · 01-28-2009, 01:29 PM

I'm back with my first 32bit XP run.

Clocks are slightly improved compared to XP x64 and my driver is now Cat. 8.12 which is slower than 8.11. Still nice improvement

No tweaks to driver at all. Just straight install

Compare link ...

I have a feeling that soon I will break 19k on single RV770 core

**cdawall** · 01-28-2009, 01:46 PM

Originally Posted by demonkevy666

seem strange that the 945 is hitting lower cpu points then 940 at an OC?

Hyper transport affected maybe.

could just be how it was utilized in the run mine was on windows 7 and with an nvidia card it could just be the difference between NV drivers and ATi

**HondaGuy** · 01-29-2009, 09:14 AM

Another test with ATI 9.1
Update:http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9813912
3DMark Score 20677 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 8227
SM 3.0 Score 9757
CPU Score 5688

**cdawall** · 01-29-2009, 05:59 PM

maybe i had a bad run and that was the reason for low cpu score...

**demonkevy666** · 01-29-2009, 06:25 PM

Originally Posted by cdawall

maybe i had a bad run and that was the reason for low cpu score...

mind running that one more times again with Ht at 1800

going for 5200 to 5800 from 100mhz doesn't seem right unless the Ht is limiting the cpu at higher speeds ? ( I didn't think it was possible, but maybe tha'ts why Am3 will get a 3.2ghz HT.

**cdawall** · 01-29-2009, 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by demonkevy666

mind running that one more times again with Ht at 1800

going for 5200 to 5800 from 100mhz doesn't seem right unless the Ht is limiting the cpu at higher speeds ? ( I didn't think it was possible, but maybe tha'ts why Am3 will get a 3.2ghz HT.

i also switched from windows 7 to XP :/

will run again though i want to see the difference

**vfx** · 01-29-2009, 06:41 PM

Originally Posted by demonkevy666

mind running that one more times again with Ht at 1800

going for 5200 to 5800 from 100mhz doesn't seem right unless the Ht is limiting the cpu at higher speeds ? ( I didn't think it was possible, but maybe tha'ts why Am3 will get a 3.2ghz HT.

I've had some funky results with the CPU score as well, anywhere from 5800 to over 6k at pretty much the same speeds.

**merkk1** · 01-29-2009, 11:32 PM

Well i'am on a 32 bit os now here my up-date , cpu 3.84@ 1.5v , 4 HIS 3850 (256) @710/950, ATI drivers 9.1 , 32 bit vista
SM2 8372
SM3 11,571
CPU 5323
SCORE 22,042
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9821048
man i,am pumped 22,000 points and a 140 FPS score in canyon flight using 3850s video cards this is what spider is all about .

**merkk1** · 01-29-2009, 11:35 PM

sorry here the screen shot

**Ben_Brown** · 01-30-2009, 05:10 AM

That is an awesome score, good job!!

**merkk1** · 01-30-2009, 05:26 AM

Thank you Ben i thing i can get a litte more out of my 3850 set-up but i don't think i get into the 23,000 i just don't think my cpu will make it to 4.0 wicth is what i think it will take to break 23,000 mark with my 3850s but i'am going to give it one hell of try.

**~~KELL5~~** · 01-30-2009, 05:47 AM

Originally Posted by merkk1

man i,am pumped 22,000 points and a 140 FPS score in canyon flight using 3850s video cards this is what spider is all about .

Indeed it's a nice score.......but 4x cards? Thats £240 of gpu's (if all bought today at the lowest price I can find), not to mention the power draw. Surely the £240 spent on a single card would be much more efficient? Unless ofcourse you bought them all staggered, then it perhaps makes more sense.

Good luck for gettin' 23k

Thread: Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions