Quote Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
No, actually my chip does the exact same thing. I just did a 20 pass run maybe 2h ago. Same clock, same voltage. I used memory at 1691, 7-8-7-20-1T timings, uncore at around 3800MHz give or take a few MHz.

LLC was on auto in my run. CPUZ reported voltage showed 1.288V (not completly correct, but then again, only a DMM is really correct).

If however I set 20x200MHz, I have to use roughly 1.3V.

It's funny that OC with higher BCLK actually works better than higher multipler. Completly opposite of what we should be seeing.

No wonder all the chips basically clock the same across the versions (920, 940, and 965 XE).
My voltage fluxuated from 1.288 to 1.296 during the Linpack test.

I just started trying to Oc this chip. My next step is to increase the memory to over 1600 Mhz and try to stabalize that.

I turned off HT and tried to get 4.4 stable, and just couldn't. I think I need to adjust something else besides vcore since I ramped it all the way up to 1.53 v and still unstable.

I'm using a new board. Asus P6T Deluxe. I'm familiar with the Gigabyte board more. It seems you have more voltages to adjust compared to the Asus.

The 940 is more expensive than the 920 and reacts similarly, but I'm selling my 920. I can't hit 210 bclk with it unless I increase qpi/vtt past 1.75V which is crazy. It does work really well at 200 x 19 w/ HT on though.