MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 171

Thread: Informal test results CPU 350 vs Apogee GTZ

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,212
    Easy killers!
    In this test the only variable is the CPU block.
    Restriction difference for just about any type of pump used
    should be proportional.
    _______________
    Q66@3.8ghz
    Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
    4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
    ^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^


    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
    The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.

    Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    316
    Let me ask the question a different way (and I may be misunderstanding Gabe's reply (the one he's linked).

    It seems that by using the chiller certain testing peculiarities are introduced that would make the use of a "normal" pump inappropriate in some way (correct Gabe?). If that is the case, and the use of the chiller is to eliminate the variable of room temperature (another assumption on my part) then if we assume the room temperature is very constant (maybe not) wouldn't the use of a radiator eliminate that and allow the use of a readily available pump?

    I guess what I'm getting at is the good old real world test scenario. All roads seem to lead back to the beginning

    But let me say this. I'm not saying Gabe's tests don't have merit (and yes I am very aware of what the scientific method is and variables) but... I just can't seem to get it out of my mind that the lab you use Gabe seems to introduce it's own set of variables that might not be representative. Maybe I'm completely off base, and I can't quantify them well, it's just a feeling (and yeah feelings aren't very scientific )
    i7 920@4.0 Ghz | Asus Rampage III Extreme | 12GB Corsair Dominator 15000
    ATI Radeon 5870 x2 | Samsung LN55B650 55" 1080p + Samsung LT4665N 46" 1080p LCD TVs
    Koolance CPU-350/Vid-AR587 on Koolance ERM-2K3U
    Zalman HD160XT HTPC | Intel X25-M 160GB SSD + 2x VelociRaptors | Thermaltake Toughpower 1200w PSU

  3. #3
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    Quote Originally Posted by santiagodraco View Post
    Let me ask the question a different way (and I may be misunderstanding Gabe's reply (the one he's linked).

    It seems that by using the chiller certain testing peculiarities are introduced that would make the use of a "normal" pump inappropriate in some way (correct Gabe?). If that is the case, and the use of the chiller is to eliminate the variable of room temperature (another assumption on my part) then if we assume the room temperature is very constant (maybe not) wouldn't the use of a radiator eliminate that and allow the use of a readily available pump?

    I guess what I'm getting at is the good old real world test scenario. All roads seem to lead back to the beginning

    But let me say this. I'm not saying Gabe's tests don't have merit (and yes I am very aware of what the scientific method is and variables) but... I just can't seem to get it out of my mind that the lab you use Gabe seems to introduce it's own set of variables that might not be representative. Maybe I'm completely off base, and I can't quantify them well, it's just a feeling (and yeah feelings aren't very scientific )
    Even with a very well controlled air conditioning system you have 1-1.5F difference in the room temperature if not larger swings. Since our radiators rely on the room temperature for their heat transfer the differences between test can vary substantially.

    But with a chiller holding the water temps to tenths of a degree you have the best constant between test. (This statement is not directed at any one person) Questioning to understand someone's test results is good for learning but questioning someone's methods unless you are more qualified to do the testing is just foolish.

    If this kind of thread craping continues manufactures and independent testers will not want to share their results, who would. To spend the kind of time and money to do valid testing to only have unqualified people call them everything from a liar to a fool is not what this forum was built on. FUGGER pays large sums of money to keep this forum running so all of us have a place to share our passions and ideas so lets bring XtremeSystems back to the fair and balanced forum it is known for. just my $.015
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,036
    riptide already said it wasn't gonna continue, and I am glad. Sig, that last paragraph you wrote could not have been written any better. It ought to be put into it's own locked sticky at the top of this forum.

    Man, I've been to other forums, and some of the stuff I read there had me believing some very bad things. Things which I later learned on here were completely false and inaccurate. That is why I registered here in the beginning and is why I am here now. These scientiffic tests are what separates the fact from fiction. If we started arbitarily thorwing in just anything into the mix we'd have contradictory results and tests and it would be a mess.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •