Page 30 of 71 FirstFirst ... 202728293031323340 ... LastLast
Results 726 to 750 of 1751

Thread: The Phenom II List of Overclocks

  1. #726
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    holy ing batman ^^^^^^

    please tell me you got this on water or air? and yes what are Vcore and temps please

  2. #727
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    He's on phase.
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  3. #728
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    114
    well i cant really get anything stable on my board. cpu will boot 4 and was stable at 3825 but i just have random issues. the board just has so many issues i dont know where to begin stay away from the dfi 790gx jr if you want to overclock a pii the bios are a joke right now...

  4. #729
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,524
    Run with Biostar TA790GX A2+
    HT V @1.456, NB V @1.47
    I like the bios, boot up at 3.8Ghz and easy 2.9Ghz NB freq.

    On air, all cores...

    Last edited by Dumo; 01-20-2009 at 02:13 AM.

  5. #730
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3
    model#=PII 940 BE
    cpu_steps=CACVC AC 0849APMW
    cpu_freq=3711
    cpu_core="1.456 in the blue screen"
    nb_freq=2385.1
    htt_freq=2120.1
    mem_freq=530
    mem=2x2gb/Unganged
    mobo=asus m3a79-t dlx
    cooling=tec..
    os=x86_xp_sp2



    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=487779



    **question about the occt. is the high priority default..if not, i will run it again w/ it.****
    Last edited by servermonkey; 01-20-2009 at 02:44 AM.

  6. #731
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    4
    Hi, i've been reading this thread to gain some info how to OC my rig, so i give it a try.

    I'm from the Netherlands so sorry for my sometimes poor English.

    I'm very proud of my rig 'cause i worked my ass of to pay the damn thing

    But i want to reach those (magical) figures of 4.0 ghz but hey who doesn't.

    I've been able to run it at 3.8 stable on a dozen or so Vantage runs, but when i run OCCT it crashes after half an hour due to high temps.

    Maybe i can run it with lower Vcore but my RAID% collapsed and had to rebuild it so couldn't test anymore.
    I will give it a go next weekend.

    3.8 is not to bad for what i've been reading overhere but i'm on water so maybe higher is possible.

    3.8 running specs:

    CPU: 3.8
    CPU multiplier: 19
    FSB: 200
    Vcore: 1.5750v
    Ram @1066 5 5 5 15
    Ram: 2.1v
    HT: 800 or so, it's sets itself back 'cause it's on AUTO
    NB FreQ: 2800
    NB Multiplier:14
    All other settings are stock or AUTO.

    Here a screenie of the highest run out of 12 Vantage.



    My rig:
    Asus Crosshair II Formula
    AMD Phenom II 940
    Thermaltake Thougpower 1200w
    4x2g Corsair Dominator 1066mhz
    Asus GTX280 @ SLI
    Windows Vista H.P. 64bit


    If somebody got a good idea or any upgrading critisism i'm listning.

    Thanks in advance for the replies.

    And guys, keep up the good work of torturing these lovely CPU's

    Grts from Holland


    Chris
    Last edited by CeeBee01; 01-20-2009 at 09:55 AM.

  7. #732
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by HondaGuy View Post
    CACVC AC 0848FPAW
    I got the same one
    batch 0077

  8. #733
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Rammsteiner View Post
    Ugh, forget it Everytimer I think I solved it somehow it happens again anyway.

    First I had random 0x00000124 issues. This seems to ber solved now. However I still get the pop-up notifying that ati driver has stopped working and is recovered. This can happen 5 times in a row and BSOD into 0x00000116. And just yesterday it got worse and just BSOD'd into 0x00000ea.

    I tried loads of things, I reinstalled the driver a few times, I chose not to install CCC a few times, when it was installed I chose to close it before gaming and I even tried to install ATT instead of CCC... Im done and Ill re-install XP x64. It's a shame since I wanted Vista for DX10 but this way I cant use it anyway.

    Great job M$, luckily they're already testing Windows 7 while it seems that this particular issue (which happens to nVidia too btw) has been there since the Vista beta!

    Then to think a few years ago everyone was like avoiding XP as much as possible, well, I embrace it right now
    Yank your other two cards for now and completely get rid of Catalyst.
    1) Uninstall via control panel
    2) Remove video cards (and choose to delete driver software) out of device manager
    3) Scan for hardware changes
    4) If it comes back as an ATI whatever instead of a generic video card, go to #2 and repeat until it doesn't. You may have to do this once for each version of Catalyst you've installed since you installed Windows.
    5) Run Driver Sweeper (at guru3d, free)
    6) Reboot
    7) Run Driver Sweeper again, twice, to confirm everything is gone
    8) Reboot
    9) Ok, now you should be using Generic still and have no driver crap left over. Delete the ATI folder out of Program Files.
    10) Install an OLD version of Catalyst prior to 8.11. Preferably you go further back to like 8.6 or 8.8. 8.11 and all versions of 8.12 are seriously buggy on at least 3k and 4k series cards and I had the same issues as you until I wiped out everything and installed older drivers. Fortunately, 8.12 is only about 1-3% faster than 8.6, so you aren't missing out on much.

    Anyway, if you don't BSOD and get driver responding errors anymore, you'll know it was the dreadful 8.11/8.12 fiasco to blame. Install your other cards again.
    Last edited by Particle; 01-20-2009 at 06:20 AM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  9. #734
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Yank your other two cards for now and completely get rid of Catalyst.
    1) Uninstall via control panel
    2) Remove video cards (and choose to delete driver software) out of device manager
    3) Scan for hardware changes
    4) If it comes back as an ATI whatever instead of a generic video card, go to #2 and repeat until it doesn't. You may have to do this once for each version of Catalyst you've installed since you installed Windows.
    5) Run Driver Sweeper (at guru3d, free)
    6) Reboot
    7) Run Driver Sweeper again, twice, to confirm everything is gone
    8) Reboot
    9) Ok, now you should be using Generic still and have no driver crap left over. Delete the ATI folder out of Program Files.
    10) Install an OLD version of Catalyst prior to 8.11. Preferably you go further back to like 8.6 or 8.8. 8.11 and all versions of 8.12 are seriously buggy on at least 3k and 4k series cards and I had the same issues as you until I wiped out everything and installed older drivers. Fortunately, 8.12 is only about 1-3% faster than 8.6, so you aren't missing out on much.

    Anyway, if you don't BSOD and get driver responding errors anymore, you'll know it was the dreadful 8.11/8.12 fiasco to blame. Install your other cards again.
    sure glad I saved 8.10 .8.11 was ok but, 8.12 keeps putting a load on My GPU when I full screen my TV. and now it totally ed it up and won't play TV right at all.I hit play the images is still and the sound is there I pause it it shows the frame it didn't play >_>. Full screen TV I get a prictureover laps in between frames and it never go's away. now lasty playing anything in 3d nowisgiving some weird frame sync(sync vertical refresh is OFF)

    thanks for the driver sweeper info
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  10. #735
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,524
    3D air, Biostar....


  11. #736
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Yank your other two cards for now and completely get rid of Catalyst.
    1) Uninstall via control panel
    2) Remove video cards (and choose to delete driver software) out of device manager
    3) Scan for hardware changes
    4) If it comes back as an ATI whatever instead of a generic video card, go to #2 and repeat until it doesn't. You may have to do this once for each version of Catalyst you've installed since you installed Windows.
    5) Run Driver Sweeper (at guru3d, free)
    6) Reboot
    7) Run Driver Sweeper again, twice, to confirm everything is gone
    8) Reboot
    9) Ok, now you should be using Generic still and have no driver crap left over. Delete the ATI folder out of Program Files.
    10) Install an OLD version of Catalyst prior to 8.11. Preferably you go further back to like 8.6 or 8.8. 8.11 and all versions of 8.12 are seriously buggy on at least 3k and 4k series cards and I had the same issues as you until I wiped out everything and installed older drivers. Fortunately, 8.12 is only about 1-3% faster than 8.6, so you aren't missing out on much.

    Anyway, if you don't BSOD and get driver responding errors anymore, you'll know it was the dreadful 8.11/8.12 fiasco to blame. Install your other cards again.
    Thanks for the info, but already re-installed XP x64. I was completely done with Vista Ill wait for SP2 or so before Ill try it again.

    Anyway, what's considered to be a safe Voltage for Vnb? Im on air, but also with MOSFETs in mind. Im now at 9x285 for NB, but I'd like to get it to 10x285. I need about setting 15~16 for Vnb on this speed (say 1.275~1.3V), where should this end if I wanted to get higher with the Vnb?

    Also, did anyone try Prime95 64-bit (blend)? Somehow it makes my system BSOD/error while I can run Memtest for 250%+ without issues First time I used Prime95 64, but also nothing seemed to help to fix errors, so Ill just use normal Prime95/OCCDT/Memtest then
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  12. #737
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northeast Ohio, Where the weather changes every 30 min...
    Posts
    598
    Well guys... I have bad news. My laptop which had everything on it, is now just dead. I'll have to find something to get all my stuff off the hd, but its completely like dead now. So for you guys that means I don't have a way to update the list because that laptop was the only system I had with a copy of word on it. My copy of office is at home, so its a good thing I'm going home this weekend. I was hoping to make it through this semester with it, but I guess not.

    On the fun side of things I have it completely taken apart and the only thing they used real thermal paste on was the cpu, northbridge and graphics had these weird pad things. Now I really get to go and price out a new laptop, so no launch day AM3 system for me.

    So could someone take over the task for me? All I'd need to do is make it so someone else can edit my first post.
    Not much to say right now.

  13. #738
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Rammsteiner View Post
    Thanks for the info, but already re-installed XP x64. I was completely done with Vista Ill wait for SP2 or so before Ill try it again.

    Anyway, what's considered to be a safe Voltage for Vnb? Im on air, but also with MOSFETs in mind. Im now at 9x285 for NB, but I'd like to get it to 10x285. I need about setting 15~16 for Vnb on this speed (say 1.275~1.3V), where should this end if I wanted to get higher with the Vnb?

    Also, did anyone try Prime95 64-bit (blend)? Somehow it makes my system BSOD/error while I can run Memtest for 250%+ without issues First time I used Prime95 64, but also nothing seemed to help to fix errors, so Ill just use normal Prime95/OCCDT/Memtest then
    Hey Ramm,how's the XP64 serving you? You got rid of those BSODs with the XP64 OS?

  14. #739
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Sure, I'll do it.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  15. #740
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northeast Ohio, Where the weather changes every 30 min...
    Posts
    598
    Now do I just need to pm a mod to give you access to it or how does this work?
    Not much to say right now.

  16. #741
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    299
    4.758GHz @ 1.608v under Windows XP 32-bit

    CPU Stepping: CACVC AC 0850BPDW

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=489008

  17. #742
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    I don't know that it can be setup in such a way as to allow me to edit your post. Fortunately, that won't be necessary. We can just setup the image and I can maintain that image file.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  18. #743
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    I don't know that it can be setup in such a way as to allow me to edit your post. Fortunately, that won't be necessary. We can just setup the image and I can maintain that image file.
    yea that would be nice i liked how it was on the last phenom I list which i believe you did.

  19. #744
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by Brother Esau View Post
    Problems Right Now with Current Bios for ALL D.F.I AMD Boards with New Phenom II. Taiwan is working on this and I am Testing a Alpha Candidate right Now For D.F.I that will bring universal Code and layout for all D.F.I AMD Boards ...................Be Patient its being addressed as we speak

    Take my advice DO NOT Push to Hard with Current Bios. Voltage Tables in Bios Need serious attention much more so on 790FXB Models
    Thanks brother.

    As we "speek" I am running OCCT 2.0 on my "old" Gigabyte GA-MA690G-S3H with the X4 920 @ 260x12
    Unfortunately VCore is "no-no" in the F7 bios (which is the latest and only that support Deneb/PHII). So I cannot go any further on CPU-clock (regardless of HTT/MP combos).
    I am running 260x12 just to verify that my DFI board was (for now)"crap" as it only allowed HTT < 240 (also verified with an X2 6000+)
    The "old cheapo" Gigabyte board easily do over HTT300.
    So until I get a "working" Bios in my somewhat "pricey" DFI Jr-board I will have to be satisfied.
    This "session" is a very good example of how cheap you can get away with purchasing a PHII for an existing rig.
    (Max load was a tad over 45 degrees).
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	GKNMA69G-S3H_X4_920_260x12_OCCTRunning.JPG 
Views:	546 
Size:	60.1 KB 
ID:	93231  
    Last edited by TL1000S; 01-20-2009 at 01:02 PM.

    3DMarknn - 79506/96025/33499/25592

  20. #745
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by NCspecV81 View Post
    4.758GHz @ 1.608v under Windows XP 32-bit

    CPU Stepping: CACVC AC 0850BPDW

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=489008


    COOLING??????? nice Oc



  21. #746
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by SkullCracka View Post
    COOLING??????? nice Oc
    SS phase. Actually just a stock vapo LS w/ fan mod and duniek mount.

  22. #747
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Oldguy, here, use this in an img tag in your original post. I'll start with the Prime95-passable list. Please make a note that people should PM me to alert me of changes to their scores and indicate if the result is to be a new entry or a modification for something already in the table.

    I will update the image at this URL with entries as they are submitted to me. The OP will always be up to date without editing it that way.

    http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/octprime.png
    http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/octsuicide.png

    Stable


    Suicide
    Last edited by Particle; 01-20-2009 at 02:30 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  23. #748
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Oldguy, here, use this in an img tag in your original post. I'll start with the Prime95-passable list. Please make a note that people should PM me to alert me of changes to their scores and indicate if the result is to be a new entry or a modification for something already in the table.

    I will update the image at this URL with entries as they are submitted to me. The OP will always be up to date without editing it that way.
    hi particle. im running xp32 sp3. occt stable ~7.25 hours
    Testing-
    ---
    DFI LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH - 1/16 Beta
    ---
    Phenom II X4 940 (CACVC AC 0850BPDW), 3.82GHZ (19x201) @ 1.46v (+150mv), NB: 2.61GHZ (x13) @ 1.3375v (11), HT: 2.61GHZ, PCI-E: 101MHZ, CPU: P-1 state
    ---
    OCZ Reaper, 2x2GB @ 2.015v, MaxMemClk-1066-5-5-5-15-20-195x4, DDR2-536, Tony's 1066 Phenom SPD
    ---
    Corsair HX620, Swiftech 2xMCR120-QP + MCRES-Micro, MCP-655, Vortex XP (D-tek Fuzion v1), 1/2"

  24. #749
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    @ informal, yeah, got rid of all the crap There's one little problem regarding my X-Fi though, driver keeps wanking I didnt reboot after install and now I cant re-install Prolly have to use Driver Sweeper in save mode then.

    Just finished a 3h run of OCCT, highest priority and a mix of RAM/CPU. All was fine. Although Im still wondering wtf is with the 64-bit Prime95 It probably stresses the 64-bit registry that hard it doesnt allow a single OC But after a ~100% memtest session and this 3h OCCT run without issues Im pretty much convinced that this 64-bit Prime is either buggy or seriously picking on eventual almost non-excisting failures, so Ill leave it for what it is unless I get real problem running stuff.

    @ BE, what's the voltage table issue? Does it set voltages too high, too low or is for example 1.3V equal to 1.275V while setting 1.275V equals 1.4V? Like seriously messed up?

    According to the OC list I seem to have a damn nice OC here 3.705Ghz @ '+0.150V' and 2.565Ghz NB @ ~'14' (IIRC, somewhere between 14 and 16). Ram running DDR1140 as well. I got to try and get the NB at 2.85Ghz and the RAM timings a tad tighter
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  25. #750
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Rammsteiner View Post
    @ informal, yeah, got rid of all the crap There's one little problem regarding my X-Fi though, driver keeps wanking I didnt reboot after install and now I cant re-install Prolly have to use Driver Sweeper in save mode then.

    Just finished a 3h run of OCCT, highest priority and a mix of RAM/CPU. All was fine. Although Im still wondering wtf is with the 64-bit Prime95 It probably stresses the 64-bit registry that hard it doesnt allow a single OC But after a ~100% memtest session and this 3h OCCT run without issues Im pretty much convinced that this 64-bit Prime is either buggy or seriously picking on eventual almost non-excisting failures, so Ill leave it for what it is unless I get real problem running stuff.

    @ BE, what's the voltage table issue? Does it set voltages too high, too low or is for example 1.3V equal to 1.275V while setting 1.275V equals 1.4V? Like seriously messed up?

    According to the OC list I seem to have a damn nice OC here 3.705Ghz @ '+0.150V' and 2.565Ghz NB @ ~'14' (IIRC, somewhere between 14 and 16). Ram running DDR1140 as well. I got to try and get the NB at 2.85Ghz and the RAM timings a tad tighter
    nice going so far run occt 6.5 hours+ to inspect your NB. i've had it fail at that mark and needed to up NB v's some to get it to complete. i used to run for 5.5 hours, but then left it running and forgot, and saw it fail at 6.5. now i run usually for 8 - 8.5 in the end.
    Testing-
    ---
    DFI LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH - 1/16 Beta
    ---
    Phenom II X4 940 (CACVC AC 0850BPDW), 3.82GHZ (19x201) @ 1.46v (+150mv), NB: 2.61GHZ (x13) @ 1.3375v (11), HT: 2.61GHZ, PCI-E: 101MHZ, CPU: P-1 state
    ---
    OCZ Reaper, 2x2GB @ 2.015v, MaxMemClk-1066-5-5-5-15-20-195x4, DDR2-536, Tony's 1066 Phenom SPD
    ---
    Corsair HX620, Swiftech 2xMCR120-QP + MCRES-Micro, MCP-655, Vortex XP (D-tek Fuzion v1), 1/2"

Page 30 of 71 FirstFirst ... 202728293031323340 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •