MMM

View Poll Results: Could the TRUE performance crown be in danger?

Voters
113. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES!! XIGMATEK FTW!

    42 37.17%
  • Performance could be similar/equal

    44 38.94%
  • nah

    27 23.89%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 106

Thread: Xigmatek Launches Thor's Hammer Heat-Pipe Processor Cooler

  1. #26
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Still looking for a place to buy it in the USA

    Interested in this one for more than just the obvious reasons.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Still looking for a place to buy it in the USA

    Interested in this one for more than just the obvious reasons.
    Will be waiting for your review on this and hopefully you can still answer some of my future questions

  3. #28
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Flushing, NY
    Posts
    717
    that looks pretty nice, like the darker color
    Nikon User
    Nikon D200 (Gone =( )/D300
    Nikkor 18-105mm(Gone) // Nikkor 50mm 1.8 // Nikkor 55-200VR(Gone)
    Tokina 12-24 // Tamron 90mm //
    Manfrotto & Benro Legs // Benro Ballhead.

    Current Lust = 80-200 Or 70-200VR1 <--Pending


    No more computer parts for me... Well for now until I
    really REALLY need to upgrade.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    307
    oh gosh dunno if it performs better than the true, but heck that cooler is beautiful!
    NAME:

    CPU: e8500 @ 3.7 for now, stock volts
    COOLING: xigmatek HDT-1283 (water coming soon)
    MOBO: MSI p35 neo2-fir
    VGA: Club3d 3850, 830/1060 (stock volts!!! modded gx810 cooler) (4850 iceq3 coming soon)
    RAM: 2gb tracers 1066@940 CL4 (1.85 V)
    CASE: CM690
    PSU: Corsair VX550
    HDD: WD3200AAKS

  5. #30
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Is the TRUE even still king? Many reviews show the already released Vendetta 2 and HDT-S1283 ahead of it in performance.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,938
    Didn't the Sunbeam Core Contact Freezer already dethrone the Xigma and the TRUE?
    GB 790XTA UD4
    GSkill Pi Black 2000 Cas9
    ASUS 4870
    Enermax Revolution 1050+





    http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=67661

  7. #32
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Some show them better some show them worse than the True.

    It's hard to say really but most people say the True is best and I think it is slightly.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    1,189
    I guess since my username has Thor in it, I should get it :P
    FREEDOM ISN'T FREE
    Cruncher Support:
    Utnorris
    DarthBeavis
    DEFRANCO NATION
    _____________
    E6750@ 3.0ghz- evga 750i FTW- 320gb- Swiftech MCR220 compact- 8800gts 512mb KO- 620hx - 4gb Crucial 1066- CM 690- 6 yate loons

    E6600- Asus striker Extreme-2 x 750gb- Igloo 5710- 8800gt- antec 850w Quatro- 4gb DDR2 800- Antec 1200- 24/7 cruncher

    **Wishes for a dual- quad core cruncher **

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by YukonTrooper View Post
    Is the TRUE even still king? Many reviews show the already released Vendetta 2 and HDT-S1283 ahead of it in performance.
    The TRUE is the best heatsink on the market, and MUCH better then the Vendetta 2 and HDT-S1283.
    The only heatsink that can perform about the same as a TRUE is the IFX-14.
    The problem is that some stupid review sites, are comparing these coolers on some 45nm dualcore 1.25Vcore LOL! And they don't even prime load the CPU's! They just run some games and call the temps "fullload temps" LOL!
    Since the heat is SO low on those, the results looks random.
    Just put some high clocked quadcore and 1.4vcore, and you will see on the load temps, the TRUE beating the competition by 3 or 4C.
    And if you lap and wash mod your TRUE, it becomes even more unbeatable.

    I don't know much about this "Thor" heatsink. I really hope to see it beating the TRUE. But till today, TRUE is the king.
    Last edited by Simps; 01-15-2009 at 01:00 PM.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles/Hong Kong
    Posts
    3,058
    i know, thats so true and plus they use those uber low speed fans on the TRUE (those 40cfm fans), so cheap
    Team XS: xs4s.org



  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast miptzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Not sure if...
    Posts
    595
    The new Mugen II performs almost like TRUE.

    Probably, XIg's Thor and Schyte's Mugen II will go head-to-head on each other.....
    Raidmax ATOMIC - Core i7 3770s + Corsair H70 // Gigabyte H77N WIFI // Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 2133mhz // EVGA GTX1060 ACX2.0// Kingston SUV400 480Gb // Sharkoon SFX500L

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Simps View Post
    The TRUE is the best heatsink on the market, and MUCH better then the Vendetta 2 and HDT-S1283
    I haven't seen any reviews of the 1283 and the TRUE with the same fan where the difference was so big i'd call it a big difference.

  13. #38
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Levish View Post
    I haven't seen any reviews of the 1283 and the TRUE with the same fan where the difference was so big i'd call it a big difference.
    i got both n 2-3c difference is not big
    the difference might be bigger with a quad

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Id be willing to bet it does better on a i7 due to the larger IHS. On a Core2? Hard to say.

    TRUE is win if you want to spend the time lapping and polishing. But unlapped the Xigs definitely give the TRUE a run for their money....

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Troy Wisconsin
    Posts
    707
    anyone got some previews/reviews?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    144
    Sure is an cool looking cooler.
    I7 920 W/ Enzotech Sapphire
    Asus P6T
    4870x2 W/ XSPC Fullcover
    6gb Gskill 1600

  17. #42
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Levish View Post
    I haven't seen any reviews of the 1283 and the TRUE with the same fan where the difference was so big i'd call it a big difference.
    Here's my S1283 data that I haven't put up yet...just been sitting in my .xlsx

    Guess this is as good a time as any post it up

    E6700:


    QX6700:


    (included the lapped/hi-pres mounted TRUE just to show how good it can get--the hardmounted S1283 is already maxed out)

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria/Sandanski
    Posts
    236
    GA-X58A-UD9
    I7-970
    KHX2000C9D3T1K3 3 x 2GB
    HALE90-1000-M
    Test Bench V1.0






  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ARIZONA
    Posts
    1,564
    great idea ! been thinking of that setup for a while excp... the 6mm should be in touch with the chip and the 8mm should be on top helping

    that way more heatpipes are in touch with the cpu ihs (6mm can get closer togather and more of them touch)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    PENT E8400 batch #814A014 ...4.3 at 1.34v~4.7 at 1.45v
    FOXCONN MARS
    COOLIT Eliminator 7*c idle~27~38*c load $95bucks !
    BUFFALO FireStix's ddr2-800 do 1200 eazy at 2.1v
    OCZ 2x2 kit pc2 8500 - 1066 @1069 atm
    Quattro 1000W
    Radeon 2-4850's in crossfire
    OCZ Vertex SSD thanks Tony!
    ALL PIPED INTO HOUSE AIRCOND ;}
    *QUANTUM FORCE* saaya & sham rocks !
    *REAL TEMP*
    At least you've got some Xtreme software now for working in Xtreme situations! "Unclewebb" rocks !
    *MEMSET* Felix rocks !
    *SUPER TEC MAN* UncleJimbo rocks !
    OVERCLOCKERS MAG..http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=197660

  20. #45
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    Vapor,

    I like your comparisons very much.
    It is clear by your chart, then when already doing push-pull, the difference from 1600RPM fans from 2000RPM fans are about 1-2C. But I am sure the noise difference is a lot, since I have both speed fans, and I can tell.

    If possible for you, it would be nice if you could test on your next reviews, this kind of fan.

    http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/pa12ulqu.html
    It is a Panaflo 120x38 1700RPM rated 30db and 69CMF (model: FBA12G12L1BX). They run 1780-1800RPM at stock, despite rated 1700RPM.
    Since 1800 is in between 1600 and 2000, and as I believe, these panaflo will kill every other fan you tested (except san ace) on static pressure, from my experience, I believe you would be impressed by the performance. I would say it would manage the same performance of those other 2000RPM.

    Anyway, if it is possible for you, try to add them, on future reviews.
    I, like you, have tested a LOT of fans. and I can tell you, those panaflo's are my all time favorite fans.

    []'s
    Simps

  21. #46
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    I used Ultra Kaze 2000 for the 2000RPM fans....I've compared the Panaflos to the Ultra Kazes in my fan reviews and they're pretty comparable in terms of radiator performance....Ultra Kazes actually have less airflow loss (as a percentage), but seem to get a little louder on the radiator though, which equals out the higher airflow.

    Incidentally, the San Ace is a pretty poor performer on the radiators in terms of airflow, but it also gets quieter (probably lowers RPM in a high-impedance environment via current sensing), so it equals out

    (and yeah, difference between 1600RPM S-Flex Push/Pull and 2000RPM UK Push/Pull is minimal...much above 1600RPM on these HSF in push/pull definitely has poor scaling in terms of noise efficiency)

  22. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    99
    Thanks Vapor for including the graph, seems like 1284EE performs better than 1283 for Quad Core.

    Just waiting to see the pricing for Thor and its performance - if not I will end of buying 1284EE for my I7 rig.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    I used Ultra Kaze 2000 for the 2000RPM fans....I've compared the Panaflos to the Ultra Kazes in my fan reviews and they're pretty comparable in terms of radiator performance....Ultra Kazes actually have less airflow loss (as a percentage), but seem to get a little louder on the radiator though, which equals out the higher airflow.

    Incidentally, the San Ace is a pretty poor performer on the radiators in terms of airflow, but it also gets quieter (probably lowers RPM in a high-impedance environment via current sensing), so it equals out

    (and yeah, difference between 1600RPM S-Flex Push/Pull and 2000RPM UK Push/Pull is minimal...much above 1600RPM on these HSF in push/pull definitely has poor scaling in terms of noise efficiency)
    Great info.
    I guess what I was trying to say is this. The market has "labeled" over the last years, 120x38mm fans arround 1600RPM as low speed, and arround 2000RPM as middium speed. You know this.
    What I am trying to say, is that, that panaflo FBA12G12L1BX, runs 1800RPM stock, and it is a 120x38mm. So it is in between a low speed and middium speed, and from my tests, I believe that is the sweet spot. It won't have the noise of a 2000RPM, but from my experience, and from beeing a panaflo, it will perform about the same as a 2000RPM (as your chart already shows 1600 performing close to 2000). I am talking push-pull configs here.

    That is what I was trying to say, and that is why those are my all time favorite fans. If it is possible, try to include them on your next reviews. As I said, I believe you will be impressed.

    They cost arround 15 bucks, so they are a bit expensive.

    []'s
    Simps

  24. #49
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Simps View Post
    Great info.
    I guess what I was trying to say is this. The market has "labeled" over the last years, 120x38mm fans arround 1600RPM as low speed, and arround 2000RPM as middium speed. You know this.
    What I am trying to say, is that, that panaflo FBA12G12L1BX, runs 1800RPM stock, and it is a 120x38mm. So it is in between a low speed and middium speed, and from my tests, I believe that is the sweet spot. It won't have the noise of a 2000RPM, but from my experience, and from beeing a panaflo, it will perform about the same as a 2000RPM (as your chart already shows 1600 performing close to 2000). I am talking push-pull configs here.

    That is what I was trying to say, and that is why those are my all time favorite fans. If it is possible, try to include them on your next reviews. As I said, I believe you will be impressed.

    They cost arround 15 bucks, so they are a bit expensive.

    []'s
    Simps
    Oh, I already have some....they were in my first-first review way back when

    Definitely good for what they are

    My personal noise preferences have fallen down to the 800-1000RPM range though, where they're not the strongest (double ball bearing doesn't scale to low RPMs very well unfortunately).

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    for the price tag better be able to offer better/equal performance than TRUE otherwise is an epic fail...
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •