MMM
Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 104

Thread: AMD RV790 & RV740 in 40nm in March 2009

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084

    AMD RV790 & RV740 in 40nm in March 2009

    It looks like that RV740 and RV790 will be produced in 40nm and that the launch will be in March 2009.
    http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=378647
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    So did RV870 get delayed then?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage View Post
    So did RV870 get delayed then?
    delayed from what?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    The question is, whether RV790 is just a shrink or shrink with expand.
    RV770 @ 40nm would push it down to around 190mm². Now, expand it some 40% and we'll have a chip that's the same size as RV770 but with 52TMUs and 220SPs (1100ALUs).
    You were not supposed to see this.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    ati has been making two generations of cards off one chip for awhile now. hd2900 and 3870 are based off the same chip. 4870 and this which will be the 4900 will be based off the same chip. they are just fine tuning it adding a few more sps a die shrink and most likely a core and ram frequency boost. rv870 is set one year after rv770 and will be released in june 2009. nothing was delayed.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Lets just call it a stop gap just like with nvidia's gtx260 55nm and 280 55nm.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    Quote Originally Posted by waver_01 View Post
    delayed from what?
    I heard that RV870 was going to be released Q2 2009.

    Maybe the source confused RV790 with RV870?

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    One interesting thing is that RV770 is very close to being pad-limited. Since pads don't scale as much as logic in a process shrink, one can assume that RV790 will likely feature more SPs or something else to prevent the chip from becoming pad limited.

    However, they could also fix this by removing VDD/GND pads since the chip won't need as much power.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Then again, all this silence and odd timing could be yet another cunning serving of Sandbagging à la AMD.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Hmm, this is quite logical, since it can match nVidia toe to toe with their supposed upcoming GT212 cards, RV870 will be prepared to duel with GT300 family cards later on.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage View Post
    I heard that RV870 was going to be released Q2 2009.

    Maybe the source confused RV790 with RV870?
    It's still on time AFAIK.

    RV790 March 09 (Q1)

    RV870 June 09 (Q2)
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Dalarna
    Posts
    694
    Didn't they say that the was going to release the upgraded versions to Xmas first?

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Brodholm View Post
    Didn't they say that the was going to release the upgraded versions to Xmas first?
    well it would make sense. they said they would release a new card once a year and every 6 months after it is released they would make an upgraded one. 4870 was released at the end of june which would make sense with it at the end of December. so maybe that got delayed or who knows. maybe they are just saying 6 months after 4870x2 is released. which would be around march.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Lets just call it a stop gap just like with nvidia's gtx260 55nm and 280 55nm.
    Lets not call it a stopgap. Ati has been pretty consistent with process switches. I think it goes back as far as the R500 series. X1950pro was a 80nm shrink from 90nm(I think) around Q4/Q1, then there was R600 80nm Around Q2/Q3, then RV670 around Q4/Q1, Rv770 around Q2/Q3, and now we have RV790/740 around Q4/Q1. Granted, all of these have depended on process technology availability. R800 will come probably around Q2/Q3. No stop-gap, just predictable consistent release schedules.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    The question is, whether RV790 is just a shrink or shrink with expand.
    RV770 @ 40nm would push it down to around 190mm². Now, expand it some 40% and we'll have a chip that's the same size as RV770 but with 52TMUs and 220SPs (1100ALUs).
    RV770 on 40 nm. would be closer to 120 mm^2. We are talking about a die shrink from 55 nm --> 45 nm --> 40 nm. here. That would require a 128-bit memory bus and would thus be a good candidate for what RV740 is going to be. If RV790 has a 256-bit memory bus than it probably around 200 mm^2, or closer to what RV770 is right now if power consumption is around the same as the current RV770 and they include the sideport.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  16. #16
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Helmore,
    Dunno how you got that 120mm² - it's way too low.
    It would require a shrink worth of two full nodes. 55nm to 40nm is one single node (two half nodes, actually). One full node shrinks to about 75% of original.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    On 40 nm, i think ATi can easily hit around 1600 SP 80 TMU 24 ROP specced chip with die size budget beetween 260-300 mm^2, if they can keep their success in designing a pretty dense transistorwise GPU chip.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Helmore,
    Dunno how you got that 120mm² - it's way too low.
    It would require a shrink worth of two full nodes. 55nm to 40nm is one single node (two half nodes, actually). One full node shrinks to about 75% of original.
    R600@80nm. is 408 mm^2
    RV670@55nm. is 192 mm^2
    And they are pretty much the same chip, they added some features and cut the memory controller in half, but the amount of transistors is roughly the same.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Looks like we're in for yet another year of complete ATI dominance.


    Too much?

  20. #20
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Yep, my earlier figures are wrong. My late night algebra is sometimes off...
    But these should be about right; a full node optical shrink from 55nm to 40nm reduces die size to ~55% of original.
    256mm² @ 55nm -> 140mm² @ 40nm

    edit:
    Need 40nm process kgate/mm² figures...
    :\
    Last edited by largon; 01-11-2009 at 01:54 PM.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    On 40 nm, i think ATi can easily hit around 1600 SP 80 TMU 24 ROP specced chip with die size budget beetween 260-300 mm^2, if they can keep their success in designing a pretty dense transistorwise GPU chip.
    Your specs are too low or your diesize is way too large.
    40nm's main advantage is that increased density. AMD/ATi already did a great job with RV670/RV770 density and I'm sure they will do it again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    R600@80nm. is 408 mm^2
    RV670@55nm. is 192 mm^2
    And they are pretty much the same chip, they added some features and cut the memory controller in half, but the amount of transistors is roughly the same.
    R600 was ~420mm2 with 720m.
    RV670 had UVD ondie, DX10.1 logic, power controllers.
    Last edited by LordEC911; 01-11-2009 at 01:53 PM.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage View Post
    One interesting thing is that RV770 is very close to being pad-limited. Since pads don't scale as much as logic in a process shrink, one can assume that RV790 will likely feature more SPs or something else to prevent the chip from becoming pad limited.

    However, they could also fix this by removing VDD/GND pads since the chip won't need as much power.
    Can you explain your post for the uninitiated? What is "pad limited" etc?

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Your specs are too low or your diesize is way too large.
    40nm's main advantage is that increased density. AMD/ATi already did a great job with RV670/RV770 density and I'm sure they will do it again.

    .........
    Mate, hence the word "easily" was put there. IMHO, the shader and TMU unit might not always only need to be increased in number, but if their per unit capability is expanded, that would be pretty beneficial too.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by Sly Fox View Post
    Looks like we're in for yet another year of complete ATI dominance.


    Too much?
    dominance?

    GTX260 costs the same as 4780, is just as fast in real games people actually play instead of crap like call of juarez (minimum framerates often get ignored), overclocks better, uses less power, has better drivers (ati is always releasing hotfixes, still no game profiles), better looking anisotropic filtering, is quieter and cooler. ATI just now got a north american partner with lifetime warranty.

    Obviously Ati does it with a much smaller gpu and nvidia's margins on the GTX are crap but from a consumer point of view the GTX series is just as good in price/performance and imo better when you consider reliability and support.

    I guess you are going to bring up the 4870x2 but I don't consider multi-gpu viable.
    Last edited by shiznit93; 01-11-2009 at 02:11 PM.
    Core i5 750 3.8ghz, TRUE 120 w/Panaflo M1A 7v
    ASRock P55 Deluxe
    XFX 5870
    2x2GB GSkill Ripjaw DDR3-1600
    Samsung 2233RZ - Pioneer PDP-5020FD - Hyundai L90D+
    Raptor WD1500ADFD - WD Caviar Green 1.5TB
    X-FI XtremeMusic w/ LN4962
    Seasonic S12-500
    Antec P182

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by shiznit93 View Post
    dominance?

    GTX260 costs the same as 4780, is just as fast in real games people actually play instead of crap like call of juarez (minimum framerates often get ignored), overclocks better, uses less power, has better drivers (ati needs a hotfix for everything, still no game profiles), is quieter and cooler. ATI just now got a north american partner with lifetime warranty.

    Obviously Ati does it with a much smaller gpu and nvidia's margins on the GTX are crap but from a consumer point of view the GTX series is just as good in price/performance and imo better when you consider reliability and support.

    I was just joking. It was a parody of something Shintai had said. Which wasn't that bad of a prediction, but did end up not being all that true.

    You'll see I actually have a 260, not a 4870.

Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •