Originally Posted by Caveman787
i7 860 Batch # L933B378
ASUS Maximus III Formula
Koolance CPU-360
G.Skill 1600 7-7-7-24
Sapphire 5770
i7 860 @ 4.213 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=986383
Phenom II 550 X4 @4.160(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=652117
Phenom II 550 X2 @ 4.1(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=638438
Kuma 7750 @ 3.5....http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560031
Phenom II 940 @4.1<------ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=501007
9850BE@3.6------- http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447465
I hope this is real........seems a little out of touch with all the other people ocing. I mean I like these results but this seems to good to be true and with only .10 more volts than stock?? thats 1200mhz on just an extra .10v
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
I don't think those voltages are correct in AOD. If I had to guess they are above 1.55 to get to 4.2
"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give." --Winston Churchill
3DMark Vantage - 19,552 -- 3DMark06 - 25,066 -- 3DMark05 - 31,688 -- 3DMark03 - 114,287 -- CPU-Z - 4800MHz
Denb vs. Agena - Clock for Clock & Deneb Overclocking Results
My Water Dragon:
CPU: Phenom II 965 BE X4 (CACYC AC 0931DPMW)
CPU Cooler: Swiftech Apogee GTZ (Custom H2O)
MotherBaord: ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe
Bios: 0701
Graphics: 3x VisionTek 4870 512MB
Display: HP w2007
Memory: G.SKILL 4GB(2 x 2GB) DDR2 1066
Power: Ultra X3 1000W
Case: COOLER MASTER Centurion 590
dang...you beat me..although I haven't had a lot of time to paly with my toys because of my job. Peaople say times are tuff, but our clients are spending money...I only have one screen shot on my website, but not enough info for the chart till I get home. I guess i need some ln2 to beat you lol...
great job tho man..
I wish I had my PIX up, I could remote home and get some files pulled. I might see if my wife can send them to me.. hear is all i have for now.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
In post 151 he used a similar screenie of AOD 1.35v 3.5ghz and said not bad at stock voltage...so now these arent showing the right voltages??
Well I dont know.......just dont want to be blinded ..........maybe hes using ice water or something? Well I hope its real......wouldnt mind hitting 4ghz@1.45v
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
can it be so hard to achieve?
I'm doing the same with an intel chip prime stable......
Why would it be hard to believe for amd, sheesh my x2 3800 @ 90nm did up to 3.0 on .10 over stock.
Alot of overclockers just immediately go for the gusto and increase cpu volts expecting an uber high OC.
The ones that actually acchieve high clocks take they're time, tweak and give as little volts as possible......
If you look at his temps they are 33C which is just a tad below room temps, water cooling plus maybe an open window, honda whats load temps like? I'm guessing max 50C under a sustained load like prime for a few hours?
For reference a mach 2 pulled 1800mhz at boston event on .10 over stock........these chips do not scale well with voltage, they however scale higher at the same voltage when kept cooler.......when frozen below phase temps then you can throw volts at em.......
Its simple more volts = higher temps = less OC.........lower volts = lower temps = higher OC.......
Last edited by chew*; 01-08-2009 at 07:19 PM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
yes Ive seen all the info online......thanks, I see everything you see........but Im the type to have some doubts sometimes......I just wont flow with the grain because everybody is on a high and wants to believe everything they see. I really dont want to insult anyone but Im going to speak my mind if I feel something might look a little strange to me Im going to question it. But I also realize maybe hes running chilled water or something thats why I mentioned it
Like I said I hope these are the kinds of results that will be common......theres alot of ocers that been here for a long time that should be able to do the same. Anyway I wont mess up this thread any further........good luck with the overclocking guys.
AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
Asus Crosshair IV Formula
ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
12gb Gskill 1300mhz
HIS HD5970
Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK
4.61ghz water
4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260
Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430
If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me
Shouldn't be too hard. My 940 seems to be doing 3.8ghz on stock voltage with a bios that doesn't even completely support it. I was able to install vista at 3.6ghz cpu and 2.4ghz nb with thos being the only settings I changed. No screens right now, I'll be working on that tomorrow while I do laundry before I go back to school along with getting everything installed on it. I didn't even take the time to put a wireless card in system yet so I have internet at the house. But the only thing that matters is that the vapo works, other than I put a connector on wrong because my lcd temp thing on the front doesn't show anything useful.
Not much to say right now.
wPrime 32M @ 3800MHz: 9.857s
Max SS so far:
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Ok little progress but still tweaking.
Stable prime:
Win XP and water cooling
Other parts in sig.
Cruncher1 / Main Rig: I7-3930k@4.9Ghz / Asus Rampage Formula IV / Corsair TX850W power /HIS 7950@1300 / Corsair GT 2000 C8 + Apacer 2000 c9 2x4GB / / MCW80 block VGA / EK-Supreme HF Block CPU + 2xPA120.3 Rad + chiller
Cruncher2 I7-3930K@4.75Ghz / Asus Rampage Formula IV / MSI HAWK7870@1400 + XFX BE 7870@1180/1400 /Corsair GT 2000 C8 3x2GB / Corsair Gamer 650w power + EKWB water cooling kit
Cruncher3 FX8150@4.7Ghz / Asus Crosshair V / MSI Twin Frozr3 6950@940 / Corsair Dominator C9 2x2GB / Antec 550w power/ Corsair H80 cooling
Cruncher4 X6 1090T@4.0Ghz /M4A89GTD PRO / Club 3D 7770@1200 / Corsair Dominator 1600 C9 2GB / Coolink Corator DS /XFX 600w power
3.9 stable, nice!
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
Is that second picture showing 4.1 stable or what? The current speed in AOD is showing 4.1 but cpu-z has it at 3.9 still while running prime.Ok little progress but still tweaking.
Stable prime:
Win XP and water cooling
Other parts in sig.
@Particle - I put you in the table but I'm missing some information from you. Stepping, Mobo, and Memory Config(Just guessed 2x1gb)
New list uploaded with 10 minutes.
Edit: List updated and its really sad that I had to spend 15 minutes trying to find the control panel on asetek's site for my vapochill. Search for downloads and it comes up with nothing.
Last edited by Oldguy932; 01-09-2009 at 06:42 AM.
Not much to say right now.
Information:
CACVC AC 0850BPMW
Foxconn A79A-S 790FX+SB750
4GB PQI DDR2-800 (2x2GB)
Xigmatek HDT-S1283 120mm (Air)
Windows Server 2008 x64
Last edited by Particle; 01-09-2009 at 06:49 AM.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
So far everyone has had different motherboards, I wonder how long that'll continue. Thanks for the rest of the information Particle.
Not much to say right now.
Volts are at 1.625... is is done with XP XP3 32 bit
Last edited by HondaGuy; 01-09-2009 at 07:56 AM.
i7 860 Batch # L933B378
ASUS Maximus III Formula
Koolance CPU-360
G.Skill 1600 7-7-7-24
Sapphire 5770
i7 860 @ 4.213 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=986383
Phenom II 550 X4 @4.160(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=652117
Phenom II 550 X2 @ 4.1(MA790X-UD4P) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=638438
Kuma 7750 @ 3.5....http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560031
Phenom II 940 @4.1<------ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=501007
9850BE@3.6------- http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447465
1.625 for the 4.8 or the 4.2?
Is that 4.8 on water?
Because last I've been seeing cascade and such seem to be getting not much higher than that 5-5.3
Last edited by Caveman787; 01-09-2009 at 08:34 AM.
holy
update your sig pls
1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled
Anyone else having trouble with multipliers higher than 19 regardless of voltage? Perhaps I should bump HTT a little...
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I need to update my bios to figure anything out. I'm installing drivers/utilities as I'm typing this. Right now its at 3.7 cpu and 2.4 nb.
Man... seeing you hit that on water makes me really want to get 5ghz with the vapo. Do you want me to switch your entry to that with the new os or just make a new one since its a different os?
Not much to say right now.
Old guy is that 3.7 (3.8? from sig) with 2.4 nb with air or on your vapochill?
Anyone know if the heatspreader is soldered?
Anyone done some power consumption measurements when heavily OC'ed?
4.8G on water? Amazing. =)
Wonder what will happen in coming months once the process matures...
Last edited by largon; 01-09-2009 at 09:38 AM.
You were not supposed to see this.
I got 3.7GHz out of the box with 1.45v on air.
http://img396.imageshack.us/my.php?image=940oc2kx7.jpg
I am overclocking using AOD at this time. I am going to find my max with it. My first crack @ 06 with HD 4870 1Gb Crossfire is 20235.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9560945
I'm using the old 8.10 driver because it is the least problematic.
More results in a bit.
PH1 is soldered, I dont think they would change this on PH2
Oc'd from bios...On air unoptimized.
Its on the vapo, didn't even bother touching it with air. 3.7 with just the multi didn't like prime, I'm going to try from the 18x multi and go up using htt. I haven't touched volts yet, I want to see exactly how far it goes on stock first.
Not much to say right now.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks