MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 678

Thread: AMD Phenom II Review Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    Its already available at newegg, 920 & 940...I cant understand why they are labelled at 125W because all denebs consume less power than high-end yorkies, which are rated 95W....very strange

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Morais View Post
    Its already available at newegg, 920 & 940...I cant understand why they are labelled at 125W because all denebs consume less power than high-end yorkies, which are rated 95W....very strange
    Not really...



    Maybe if you pair the yorkfields with an nVidia chipset. Or if just using idle numbers?
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Not really...



    Maybe if you pair the yorkfields with an nVidia chipset. Or if just using idle numbers?
    Look to Lost-Circuits review, and the table that was already posted in this thread. They do consume around what yorkfields do, but it can also depend on the motherboard.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    Look to Lost-Circuits review, and the table that was already posted in this thread. They do consume around what yorkfields do, but it can also depend on the motherboard.
    In that chart I see a QX9650 use less power than a PH2 940 (Lowest of the 2 PH 940 numbers). All the rest of the yorkfields are missing besides the QX9770. Plus everything is old steppings I bet on the rest. There aint even a Q6600 there.

    So no?

    Its a THG wannabee site it seems.
    Last edited by Shintai; 01-08-2009 at 09:17 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    In that chart I see a QX9650 use less power than a PH2 940 (Lowest of the 2 PH 940 numbers). All the rest of the yorkfields are missing besides the QX9770. Plus everything is old steppings I bet on the rest. There aint even a Q6600 there.

    So no?

    Its a THG wannabee site it seems.

    wow, you really pick and choose what you read in people's posts. I said "around".
    at idle:


    and at load:


    Even if it's an old stepping, how much has power consumption improved on those chips? Do you know? 68W vs ~65W, so they are "around" the same, or approximately similar. I remember seeing measurements of a Q6600, putting it at ~70-80W at 2.4ghz.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Not really...


    Maybe if you pair the yorkfields with an nVidia chipset. Or if just using idle numbers?



    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...-920-review/13

    Well, doesnt change my point of view in rating denebs from 125W to 95W

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •