In that chart I see a QX9650 use less power than a PH2 940 (Lowest of the 2 PH 940 numbers). All the rest of the yorkfields are missing besides the QX9770. Plus everything is old steppings I bet on the rest. There aint even a Q6600 there.
So no?
Its a THG wannabee site it seems.
Last edited by Shintai; 01-08-2009 at 09:17 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
wow, you really pick and choose what you read in people's posts. I said "around".
at idle:
and at load:
Even if it's an old stepping, how much has power consumption improved on those chips? Do you know? 68W vs ~65W, so they are "around" the same, or approximately similar. I remember seeing measurements of a Q6600, putting it at ~70-80W at 2.4ghz.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...-920-review/13
Well, doesnt change my point of view in rating denebs from 125W to 95W
Bookmarks