DIMM x4 TEST 2
2GBx2 + 2GBx2
Transcend PSC AA3G 2Gx2
+
Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5D
TOTOL 8GB
DDR2-1120 CL5-5-5-15 TRFC 195ns
![]()
DIMM x4 TEST 2
2GBx2 + 2GBx2
Transcend PSC AA3G 2Gx2
+
Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5D
TOTOL 8GB
DDR2-1120 CL5-5-5-15 TRFC 195ns
![]()
Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
My English isn't good, please much and much forgive
BUS SPEED 350
OC 4.2G CPU-Z DOWN
![]()
Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
My English isn't good, please much and much forgive
I'm gonna guess less heat less power consumption needed.
No...it still requires power but less power is wasted by the taxing of power control such as in pwm and mosfets.
Atleast that's my limited understanding take.
10 posts since 2004 wow that's control.
iīm on oliverdaīs side on this one...
heat is generated by the processor. with a bigger (better) cooler itīs still drawing the same amount of power. efficiency has nothing to do with the heat.
MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W
DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W
Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1
maybe why the guys on air are taking more v's to get to 4ghz than guys on water/cold?
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W
DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W
Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1
I thought that the colder the chip the less transistor gate leakage there is. Chips still need same amount of power, but less is lost in achieving it when cooler.
Last edited by Sgt.McRuff; 01-07-2009 at 12:26 PM.
Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit
can you run cinebench or 3dmark at 208x18 and 340x11 (both will be around 3740-3744 mhz), with the RAM at about the same speeds and timings. i want to see what kind of bonus we can see by maximizing the bus speed with almost everything else the same
It's like you said.
@Oliverda, you can test it with a power meter and an fanmate. You can easy squeezup power consumption by reducing the fanspeed, that's why I do not care much about power consumption reviews without temps mentioned.
+1 @ toppc, good testings there. Can you run 3GHz at 1.185V like hondaguy did in the other thread?
Last edited by justapost; 01-07-2009 at 12:38 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Very good work Toppc!
Do any of you have data regarding PWM efficiency on motherboard (especially this MSI)? We would be able to work out actual power consumption of CPU that way.
Anyhow it looks like using this stepping AMD if wanted could release one more speed bin @3.2GHz and still be under 125W and with 140W 3.4GHz should be also possible.
Besides you need to love this CPU with C'n'Q enabled idling @1GHz/1V
Can you measure power consumption at above mentioned setting Toppc?? Please![]()
Last edited by Lightman; 01-07-2009 at 01:43 PM.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Bookmarks