Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 72

Thread: AMD X4 940 OC test in MSI DKA790GX-Platinum !!

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    139
    DIMM x4 TEST 2
    2GBx2 + 2GBx2

    Transcend PSC AA3G 2Gx2
    +
    Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5D
    TOTOL 8GB

    DDR2-1120 CL5-5-5-15 TRFC 195ns

    Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
    My English isn't good, please much and much forgive

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by vengance_01 View Post
    wow that looks really good. Thank you for taking the time to post results. Much cooler then Intels Current Quads. I just might move back to AMD. Support the little guy.
    The power measurements indicate the AMD temperature and Intel temperature readings aren't comparable.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    139
    BUS SPEED 350
    OC 4.2G CPU-Z DOWN

    Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
    My English isn't good, please much and much forgive

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Toppc View Post
    use XIGMATEK HDT 1284C
    NO OC , VCC 1.35V
    Temperature Descend

    1 SP2004
    almost 40W


    2 SP2004
    almost 55W


    3 SP2004
    almost 70


    4 SP2004
    almost 82


    WAIT 10 MIN
    4 SP2004
    almost 88W
    Why did you get lower values with bigger cooler? If I'm not mistaken the power consumption doesn't depend on the cooler.

    What kind of PSU did you use for the test?
    -

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    I'm gonna guess less heat less power consumption needed.

  6. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    I'm gonna guess less heat less power consumption needed.
    Yeap.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    I'm gonna guess less heat less power consumption needed.
    Less power consumption ---> less heat. It is not true vica versa.
    -

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    Less power consumption ---> less heat. It is not true vica versa.
    It is true, the better you cool the less power the chip needs.

    cheers

    Opteron146

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Opteron146 View Post
    It is true, the better you cool the less power the chip needs.

    cheers

    Opteron146
    Sorry but it's nonsense. If it would be true we can get approximately 1W with LN2.
    -

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    No...it still requires power but less power is wasted by the taxing of power control such as in pwm and mosfets.

    Atleast that's my limited understanding take.

    10 posts since 2004 wow that's control.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Opteron146 View Post
    It is true, the better you cool the less power the chip needs.

    cheers

    Opteron146
    Increase the heat, and you decrease efficiency. So, it makes sense cooling the chip better should slightly decrease power consumption.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Heilbronx, Germany
    Posts
    397
    iīm on oliverdaīs side on this one...
    heat is generated by the processor. with a bigger (better) cooler itīs still drawing the same amount of power. efficiency has nothing to do with the heat.


    MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
    2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
    OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W

    DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
    2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
    2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W

    Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    maybe why the guys on air are taking more v's to get to 4ghz than guys on water/cold?
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Heilbronx, Germany
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by crazydiamond View Post
    maybe why the guys on air are taking more v's to get to 4ghz than guys on water/cold?
    thatīs another story. stability isnīt equal to efficiency.


    MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
    2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
    OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W

    DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
    2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
    2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W

    Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    302
    I thought that the colder the chip the less transistor gate leakage there is. Chips still need same amount of power, but less is lost in achieving it when cooler.
    Last edited by Sgt.McRuff; 01-07-2009 at 12:26 PM.
    Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit

  16. #41
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    can you run cinebench or 3dmark at 208x18 and 340x11 (both will be around 3740-3744 mhz), with the RAM at about the same speeds and timings. i want to see what kind of bonus we can see by maximizing the bus speed with almost everything else the same

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.McRuff View Post
    I thought that the colder the chip the less transistor gate leakage there is. Chips still need same amount of power, but less is lost in achieving it when cooler.
    It's like you said.
    @Oliverda, you can test it with a power meter and an fanmate. You can easy squeezup power consumption by reducing the fanspeed, that's why I do not care much about power consumption reviews without temps mentioned.

    +1 @ toppc, good testings there. Can you run 3GHz at 1.185V like hondaguy did in the other thread?
    Last edited by justapost; 01-07-2009 at 12:38 PM.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    Why did you get lower values with bigger cooler? If I'm not mistaken the power consumption doesn't depend on the cooler.

    What kind of PSU did you use for the test?
    ENHANCE 650W

    Test process in.Only change fan
    Last edited by Toppc; 01-07-2009 at 12:57 PM.
    Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
    My English isn't good, please much and much forgive

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by justapost View Post
    It's like you said.
    @Oliverda, you can test it with a power meter and an fanmate. You can easy squeezup power consumption by reducing the fanspeed, that's why I do not care much about power consumption reviews without temps mentioned.

    +1 @ toppc, good testings there. Can you run 3GHz at 1.185V like hondaguy did in the other thread?
    This place is evening
    I need sleep
    Wait for tomorrow ok ?
    Coolaler OC Team from TAIWAN
    My English isn't good, please much and much forgive

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    Sorry but it's nonsense. If it would be true we can get approximately 1W with LN2.
    As the temp increases circuit resistance increases, more energy required to power the circuit.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Toppc View Post
    This place is evening
    I need sleep
    Wait for tomorrow ok ?
    Of course.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    319
    Thanks for sharing Toppc.
    Mucho Vcore, so the temps were not that bad I think.
    Great CPU-score in 3DM06 also.
    If this is representative for what we will get of retail PHII, this will be fun!

    3DMarknn - 79506/96025/33499/25592

  23. #48
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Very good work Toppc!

    Do any of you have data regarding PWM efficiency on motherboard (especially this MSI)? We would be able to work out actual power consumption of CPU that way.
    Anyhow it looks like using this stepping AMD if wanted could release one more speed bin @3.2GHz and still be under 125W and with 140W 3.4GHz should be also possible.

    Besides you need to love this CPU with C'n'Q enabled idling @1GHz/1V
    Can you measure power consumption at above mentioned setting Toppc?? Please
    Last edited by Lightman; 01-07-2009 at 01:43 PM.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by TL1000S View Post
    Thanks for sharing Toppc.
    Mucho Vcore, so the temps were not that bad I think.
    Great CPU-score in 3DM06 also.
    If this is representative for what we will get of retail PHII, this will be fun!
    Obviously the temps are not being reported correctly. Still good clocks though and if it is stable for a few hours the temps are not the most important factor. I defo think that denebs temp sensors are not as accurate as i7's.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Obviously the temps are not being reported correctly. Still good clocks though and if it is stable for a few hours the temps are not the most important factor. I defo think that denebs temp sensors are not as accurate as i7's.
    or i7 sensor is not as accurate as Denebs. Its all speculation so can go both ways right? what is the basis for determining which is more accurate?
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •