my carefull approach on benching new tech so long is based also on the failing 45nm intel chips we see here at xs.
it is unknown how long amd can run on high oc/voltage, i let the hardcore xs amd guys find that out.![]()
my carefull approach on benching new tech so long is based also on the failing 45nm intel chips we see here at xs.
it is unknown how long amd can run on high oc/voltage, i let the hardcore xs amd guys find that out.![]()
amd 940 @ 3.5ghz stock voltage or 3.7ghz 1,425v home made cpu block 3616 mhz and 2210mhz nb stable
gigabyte ga-ma790fx-dq6
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 160-200 in idle , 750-950 load, with 2 rivatuner power profiles shortcuts.
2x 2GB OCZ Blade 8500 ddr2 1066 @ 1.85 volt
seagate barracuda 7200-11 1x500gb & 1x640gb (rip 1 500gb barracuda)
seagate barracuda 7200-12 1TB , very nice hd, 5 degree colder then the 640gb
windows xp 32
lian li pc-a70b
cooler master real power 850watt
Indeed. What's the point if clocking the chip so high if any use of that power will cause it to kill half your computer.
Next people will say "it posts, so it's stable".
Define "high" voltage, one would expect that the chips are fine running up to the max voltage as stated by AMD. Afterall, the Intel 45nm chips have been fine as long as they were not pushed beyond 1.4/1.45v (which was the max voltage as per Intel specs I believe).
My personal view is that Intel BurnTest should be used, it "kills" things far quicker than Prime can.
Last edited by rypt; 01-06-2009 at 05:09 AM.
Bookmarks