Quad Core Round Up: AMD Vs Intel Clock to Clock(deneb vs agena + deneb vs intel)

[roofsniper]

Sorry but the people who are pro amd are usually those that are the thread destroyers

thats obviously not the case in this one.

Then why are you(and others) here "spamming" the forums?
This is XtremeSystems, the "premiere" site for us benchers, record-seekers.
Not "lamegamer.org" or similar.
If any of you really were into gaming you would not be here defending certain CPU makers calling other poster names/trolls/boasting about knowledge about "ignore-button".

Do some gameing instead.
Or better yet, accept other peoples views and right to an opinion.
Even those you dislike.

PS/Edit:
When you really wants performance in games you buy the best(price vs.performance) GPU for your favorite game.
There are as other points out little that differ between AMD/Intel CPU's when using eyecandy/hig res.
(Well.. unless you use a Celeron D).

wait you are telling me to accept others opinions in the same exact post that they are telling me to not care about gaming benchmarks? i am accepting others opinions i just think that some people like zucker here don't have an opinion and instead are just posting to bash someone about something. and yes as far as performance goes gaming performance matters the most to me. but does that mean i don't care about anything else and only want gaming benchmarks? ummmm no. i just find it crazy that people can look at benchmarks and think that the performance shown by them will show real world performance and show exactly how the cpu is. benchmarks are useful for comparing the same cpu with others. as we have seen here clock to clock agena is better sometimes. why? because the benchmark favors its core. i find many benchmarks to be completely useless but its nice to use benchmarks when you are tweaking your system to see how it changes its results.